• CFN has a new look, using the Eagle as our theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • CFN welcomes a new contributing member!

    Please welcome Beetow to our Christian community.

    Blessings in Christ, and we pray you enjoy being a member here

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Double negatives

Rollo Tamasi

Warrior for Christ
Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2012
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
4,990
Double negatives in the english language are always suppose to bring about a positive except in some english dialects.

Does anyone know of any exceptions?

I suppose I have one;

"I can't do what I can't do".

I think this double negative keeps it negative.
Am I right?
 
I ain't go no satisfaction
The TOG
 
"We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control."

Another example of negation (or actually lack thereof) in English language that puzzles me is:
"I could care less." when you are saying that you don't care at all. Because if you don't care at all, than you could NOT care less, so what you say is actually the opposite of what the phrase means.
 
"We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control."

Another example of negation (or actually lack thereof) in English language that puzzles me is:
"I could care less." when you are saying that you don't care at all. Because if you don't care at all, than you could NOT care less, so what you say is actually the opposite of what the phrase means.

Words that describe what you are saying are oxymoron, irony, and speech dyslexia.
It may also be a metaphor.
 
Sometimes a double negative actually makes sense (kinda). For example...

"You can't not forgive your mother."
- Beaver Cleaver

Beaver said that to his mother in an episode of Leave it to Beaver I watched last night (I have the whole series on DVD), after she asked him to forgive her.
The TOG
 
"We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control."

Another example of negation (or actually lack thereof) in English language that puzzles me is:
"I could care less." when you are saying that you don't care at all. Because if you don't care at all, than you could NOT care less, so what you say is actually the opposite of what the phrase means.

Words that describe what you are saying are oxymoron, irony, and speech dyslexia.
It may also be a metaphor.

I think it's speech dyxlesis... dysxlias... That last one. People mean "I couldn't care less" when they say "I could care less." A similar thing applies to the use of the word "irregardless", which is itself a double negative ("ir" and "less"). It's usually enough to say "regardless".
The TOG
 
Sometimes a double positive equals a negative.

"The patient in room 301 is down getting an x-ray".

The patient is not in room 301, he/she is down getting an x-ray.

Thus, it's negative=oxymoron.
 
"I don't know nothing."
"I haven't done nothing."

Pretzels-outof_zps06102b59.jpg


I saw this image on a site where comments and proposed captions are invited. One of the posters noticed the discrepancy and made the observation:
The sign is lying. Everybody lies during an election year.

Another poster noticed the comment and replied, "Does that mean you're lying too and that not everybody lies in an election year?" Which opened things up to further observation and attempts at humor until one person posted: "But if she's lying that everyone lies, doesn't that mean that she's telling the truth that everyone lies? And if that's the case, is she really lying, then? Ohhh the paradox!"

Then comes:

Actually, it's not a paradox: it's simply a false statement.

The opposite of "everybody lies" is not "nobody lies."

The opposite of "everybody lies" is "not everybody lies," which means "some people do not lie."

If one person does not lie, everybody else can, but the statement that everybody does is still false. It's like saying that the statement, "All 5 of my marbles are red," must be false if all 5 of the marbles are not red, but the statement can be false if 1 marble is blue and the other 4 are red. So, no, it's simply a contradictory statement (one that has to be false) and not a paradox.

We at CF.Net ain't the only ones. :screwloose
 
Back
Top