Johan
Member
- Mar 11, 2017
- 211
- 16
- Thread starter
- #21
Sure. I spoke, you spoke, I spoke and you spoke. So we spoke both and not all can decide on what is Truth to them.I'm simply responding to the things you've been putting forward.
That is admitting to this topic having become "circular" in many points.If doing so seems circular to you, then at least part of why has to do you with how you've been responding (or not, actually) to my replies to your posts.
You are welcome to respond on it again. I already made mine. No need for me to strife with it with you. Everyone will now decide for themselves who the son of perdition is. I did warn you of your strife spirit.The "son of perdition" is not a modern-day pastor. No such statement is ever made in the New Testament. The "title" is applied only to Judas and the anti-Christ, in Scripture.
That everyone will decide. No use telling me i have to do it. And neither you can do that. But you are welcome to say it is "me" as you are saying now. But all will decide for themselves. No use saying it was "not you" but "me".The Holy Spirit is on the side of God's Truth revealed in His word, the Bible. Of the two of us, who has been more careful with that Truth, not stretching or twisting it beyond what it actually says and misapplying it?
You missed what I said about the House Churches where God is in charge and speaking all the Words and doing all the actions. Your Brother obviously was in a wrong one. Which was just as the "worship meetings" ruled by the "son of perdition" who stood in the place of God and said and did his own things.House churches are not protected from being "dead Christianity" merely by being in a house. My younger brother's experience in the House Church movement illustrates this well.
I never did. You missed most of it. But it is all there and you can go and read again what I actually said. Without twisting it to what suits you.I still don't understand why you've made where the Church meets such a big deal.
That is not what the Word said in the Scripture I gave you. But I said it already. so you are welcome to read back on it.Not all Christians ought to speak in the gatherings of the Church.
That is admitting all should speak in the same Power and act in the Same Power in their various ministries. As I already said.and all indwelt equally by the Holy Spirit.
Striving is always evil. There is never "profit". I did warn you of it ruling your life.This isn't what the verse says, though. Paul criticized "striving over words to no profit" and in a way that "subverted the hearers" of the debate about terms.
Again. All will decide for themselves. Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.Actually, all they have to do is consider what we've written in the light of God's word and see whose statements about God's Truth handles His Truth most carefully.
Where God speaks and acts He is the "boundaries" and nothing else is needed. Seems you missed this point also in being blinded by the strife spirit.But without the boundaries and structure of God's Truth confining and supporting that relationship there is only spiritual chaos and danger.
As you previously admitted to. I have the same Spirit and the Same Power. In my ministry. Where I am not a copy of Paul but no less Powerful.You aren't an apostle as the First Apostles of the Early Church were.
That is contradicting your own words. I have the same Holy Spirit. Meaning the same Power, Authority and Revelation in Power. Just used in my time in my ministry which is not a copy of Paul's ministry. That is what happens when the strife spirit closes your eyes.But as such, you have none of the spiritual power, or authority, or special revelation of God possessed by the First Apostles.
Interesting topics are guiding you? That is not what you previously said.I might, if it interests me.
Why else if you don't pitch up? Then we know the Rebuking here nailed your coffin.??? Run away?
I thought only if it "interests you"?It has done all that I've just described in my own life and so, it is vitally-important to me that it be proclaimed well, without contortion or corruption.
So you speak to those who are "agents of the devil who corrupts the Word of God? I thought you said you speak in interesting topics only?They may desire sincerely to teach God's Truth but, because they reason poorly, and have no idea how to properly interpret Scripture, and want the Bible to say what they want it to say, they are prime, though usually unwitting, agents through whom the devil corrupts the Truth of God's word.
This time you say you speak against those who are spiritually immature, bad thinkers and biblically illiterate?So, then, it isn't at all that I'm looking for strife but that many who set themselves out as teachers of God's Truth online are spiritually immature, bad thinkers, and biblically-illiterate.
So we have these three cases now from you.
1. You speak only on what interests you.
2. You speak against those controlled by the devil
3. You speak against the ignorant.
So of course you have to appear on all my topics. Because you already said that both 2 and 3 are the reason for striving with me. And you said you have to be on topics where you see that. You can kick out the actual reason of "only if it is interesting".
But don't worry. I can handle it. I Rebuke it and used it to do Edifying of all and all can learn what Edifying is all about. And what Rebuking is all about. Because it is time for Jesus to manifest in Judgment and Ruling Authority in being Judge and King. And I am assisting all in Edifying them to enter that Anointing.
Last edited by a moderator: