And besides, tell me where AnswersinGenesis accused "EVERYONE" else.
Tell me the link of the article they acused "everyone else" of lying. Not just F2F-Evolution-believers, but "Everyone".
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
And besides, tell me where AnswersinGenesis accused "EVERYONE" else.
Tell me the link of the article they acused "everyone else" of lying. Not just F2F-Evolution-believers, but "Everyone".
I seriously hope you are right.Atheism can't be taught in public schools
The same First Amendment that protects kids from being indoctrinated by theists, protects them from being indoctrinated by atheists (or agnostics, I suppose).I seriously hope you are right.
Actually, Darwin was a theist, who attributed the origin of life to God.If that's true, this doesn't change the fact that their evolution-based origins tales still are
He was a theist, at least when He wrote On the Origin of Species. He ends it by saying that God created the first living things.Because you think Darwin was a Christan... do you?
Well, transcribers can. And do.So you believe God can/does mess up.
Few Christians are confused by His word. Some might not be ready to accept it as it is, but that's not God's fault.Not surprising given you think God confuses us by starting His Word with an open ended allegory.
The 1st amendment refers to government, right?The same First Amendment that protects kids from being indoctrinated by theists, protects them from being indoctrinated by atheists (or agnostics, I suppose).
This doesn't address what you quoted.Actually, Darwin was a theist, who attributed the origin of life to God.
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.
Charles Darwin, last sentence of On the Origin of Species
There are almost certainly no sentient biological extraterrstrial beings.other beings on other worlds, would it destroy your faith in God? I can't imagine why.
But did he believe in Jesus' Resurrection and Divinity? The Trinity doctrine?He was a theist, at least when He wrote On the Origin of Species. He ends it by saying that God created the first living things.
Why?Inerrancy is a modern error.
Yes, and the Bible says that mens hearts will grow cold.As late as the 1940s, most creationists were OE.
I know the YEC's aren't confused by Genesis.Few Christians are confused by His word.
The flood was global. Obviously that area was included.You should probably know that there is very good evidence that a great regional flood drowned a huge area in the Middle East about the right time to be Noah's flood.
It refers to freedoms. I suppose you could go at it backwards and say that it puts limits on government.The 1st amendment refers to government, right?
KV-44-v1 said:
Because you think Darwin was a Christan... do you?
Sure seems like it.This doesn't address what you quoted.
"Almost certainly?"There are almost certainly no sentient biological extraterrstrial beings.
And they invented YE creationism. But I don't see the point. Darwin did admit (in The Voyage of the Beagle) that the officers of the ship kidded him about his orthodox Anglican beliefs.But did he believe in Jesus' Resurrection and Divinity? The Trinity doctrine?
SDA's are thiests, too.
More specifically, the doctrine that anything mentioned in scripture must be true, regardless of it's application to the point of the text, is in error. TheWhy?
God invented the YEC position by inspiring the Bible. Not "they", unless you're promoting polythiesm.And they invented YE creationism.
Not the smallest seed ever. But the smallest seed an average farmer had.It's not even close to being the smallest seed.
The size of seeds and how much land was flooded in the time of Noah is not for the sake of salvation.
Ever considered that if Genesis is allegory, NOTHING contradicts it? How can things not stated as facts contradict anything?
The flood was global. Obviously that area was included.
Just because your favorite plot of land to post about, got flooded along with the rest of Earth, doesn't make the flood non-global.
the Bible says that mens hearts will grow cold.
Before 1800's, OE beliefs were not so widespread.
Back then, more people allowed for God. The Biblical God. The further time moves on, it seems, men chase after sin more and more.
It's no surprise that they would also be easier to be led into false ideas like OE more and more, too.
Do you think evolution involves the origin of life?
Evolution belief leads to E.T. thinking.
Some evolution believers at NASA are wasting taxpayer money in futile pursuit of aliens. If only they believed Genesis.... evolution about the origin of life?
Slight disagreement. A theory may very wellEvolution is not merely a scientific law. Even a reasonably bright middle school student will tell you that Darwin's theory is not a law.
A law predicts what will happen under given circumstances, without explaining why.
A theory predicts and explains what will happen under given circumstances.
Hence Newton's laws of motion, but Newton's theory of gravitation. Newton doesn't explain why motion is as it is, but he does explain why gravitation works as it does.
Since Darwin's theory predicts and explains evolution, it is a scientific theory, not merely a law.
Another important element of a theory is that it must make predictions that have been tested and verified. So Darwin's four predictions have been repeatedly verified, as have Newton's predictions of the way gravitation works.
But theories are never absolutely the truth. Turns out, Newton's theory wasn't the whole story. Even though it remains true that we can use Newton's theory to navigate the solar system, there are some truths about gravity that are not in his theory. Likewise, while Darwin's theory of evolution remains true and it can be used to make useful predictions about how populations change, there are some things that are true about evolution that are not in his theory.
Both evolutionary theory and gravitational theory have been revised and improved since they were first proposed.
Laymen often fail to understand what "law" and "theory" actually mean. Often with amusing results as occured this time.
In principle. But historically, they pretty much all had to be modified as evidence accumulated.Slight disagreement. A theory may very well
be true in every detail.
Yep.As to the confusion about law/ theory, it would
be a terrific help all around if say 5 or,10 minutes
were spent on google.