Milk-Drops
Member
- Apr 10, 2012
- 7,117
- 1,057
Name some and explain to us why they should be credible sources.even if so but not according to creationists
Okay, you've repeated this string of adjectives together but have yet to explain what you mean. What exactly are you addressing and how its what you are claiming it to be.better than pseudo/phony fakes, frauds, cons, cover ups, way out, weird and wacky, non science and nonsense -
You aren't being coherent. can you please summarize your case. Otherwise you won't be convincing many people that the points you are making are true and the points you are against are false.the big ones presently doing the rounds viz Dinosaurs and millions of years and the Big Bang as now you see me and accept me and now you don't - twinc