stovebolts
Member
- Nov 4, 2004
- 18,905
- 7,268
Coffeelover,
After reading through this thread, it became apparent that your issue isn't whether the earth is round or flat, or if Genesis 1 and 2 are literal or myth. Your issue is one where you call yourself a Christian, and you oppose the idea that another Christian would say that you or others are not Christians based on a world view of a particular text that has nothing to do with ones walk with Christ, but rather ones ideology.
In that regard, I'm with you. We should not say that others are not Christian because on non essential matters, we simply miss the point.
But one thing I would like to say is this. First and foremost scripture is to be looked as a story, not history. When we look at particular scriptures first and foremost as a history lesson, then we've deduced scripture to datapoints and facts and the story looses it's thrust in what was originally trying to be portrayed and we miss the point all together.
So, in short, whether it's taken literal or figurative, this should come secondary to the point being conveyed. And on that note, for those that spend so much time arguing about these data points, it's simply amazing how shallow their understanding when it comes to the story itself.![096_sad :( :(](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sad.gif)
After reading through this thread, it became apparent that your issue isn't whether the earth is round or flat, or if Genesis 1 and 2 are literal or myth. Your issue is one where you call yourself a Christian, and you oppose the idea that another Christian would say that you or others are not Christians based on a world view of a particular text that has nothing to do with ones walk with Christ, but rather ones ideology.
In that regard, I'm with you. We should not say that others are not Christian because on non essential matters, we simply miss the point.
But one thing I would like to say is this. First and foremost scripture is to be looked as a story, not history. When we look at particular scriptures first and foremost as a history lesson, then we've deduced scripture to datapoints and facts and the story looses it's thrust in what was originally trying to be portrayed and we miss the point all together.
So, in short, whether it's taken literal or figurative, this should come secondary to the point being conveyed. And on that note, for those that spend so much time arguing about these data points, it's simply amazing how shallow their understanding when it comes to the story itself.
![096_sad :( :(](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/sad.gif)