https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Join Elected By Him for a devotional on Ephesians 6:14-15
https://christianforums.net/threads/devotional-selecting-the-proper-shoes.109094/
COLUMBIA — A Bible-only policy for inmates at a South Carolina jail is stricter than policies governing reading materials allowed some of the country's most dangerous inmates, a former warden who ran the tough federal penitentiary that replaced Alcatraz said in court documents.
John L. Clark, who served for years as warden of the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Ill., filed an affidavit that states that letting prisoners read various materials kept even that Supermax prison safe. That complex replaced Alcatraz when it closed in 1963.
"Allowing ... Marion's prisoners to access reading material was a component of effectively managing the facility's high security population," wrote Clark, a former assistant director of the federal Bureau of Prisons. "The policy of allowing prisoners to receive publications did not create any threats to good order or security."
He added in the affidavit, filed Monday in federal court, that educational materials, newspapers, books and magazines broaden prisoners' and detainees' ability "to function in and relate to mainstream society upon their release."
"The same principles apply to prisoners' and detainees' access to religious material, including religious texts as well as accompaniments used to pray, study about, or otherwise exercise one's religion," he added.
Clark's statements were filed by the Prison Legal News, a monthly legal journal by the Human Rights Defense Center that is at the center of a federal lawsuit in South Carolina. Since 2008, the journal's publishers have tried to send magazines, letters and self-help books about prison life to several inmates at the Berkeley County jail, but copies were returned after jail officials said staples inside posed a security risk.
Homeopinion
- Comments
- Share
- Reprints
- View one page
- Enlarge Text
Ex-warden: Bible-only jail policy in Moncks Corner too strict
MEG KINNARD
The Associated Press
Published: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 4:00 p.m.
Last Modified: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 4:11 p.m.
Page 2 of 2
COLUMBIA — A Bible-only policy for inmates at a South Carolina jail is stricter than policies governing reading materials allowed some of the country's most dangerous inmates, a former warden who ran the tough federal penitentiary that replaced Alcatraz said in court documents.
John L. Clark, who served for years as warden of the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Ill., filed an affidavit that states that letting prisoners read various materials kept even that Supermax prison safe. That complex replaced Alcatraz when it closed in 1963.
"Allowing ... Marion's prisoners to access reading material was a component of effectively managing the facility's high security population," wrote Clark, a former assistant director of the federal Bureau of Prisons. "The policy of allowing prisoners to receive publications did not create any threats to good order or security."
He added in the affidavit, filed Monday in federal court, that educational materials, newspapers, books and magazines broaden prisoners' and detainees' ability "to function in and relate to mainstream society upon their release."
"The same principles apply to prisoners' and detainees' access to religious material, including religious texts as well as accompaniments used to pray, study about, or otherwise exercise one's religion," he added.
Clark's statements were filed by the Prison Legal News, a monthly legal journal by the Human Rights Defense Center that is at the center of a federal lawsuit in South Carolina. Since 2008, the journal's publishers have tried to send magazines, letters and self-help books about prison life to several inmates at the Berkeley County jail, but copies were returned after jail officials said staples inside posed a security risk.
"Our inmates are only allowed to receive soft-back bibles in the mail directly from the publisher," First Sergeant K. Habersham wrote in a July email to publishers, explaining the jail's policy. "They are not allowed to have magazines, newspapers, or any other type of books."
The American Civil Liberties Union sued the jail in October on the publication's behalf, arguing that authorities at the jail in Moncks Corner, about 100 miles southeast of Columbia, are violating the magazine's and inmates' constitutional rights. Jail officials then told The Associated Press the jail didn't have a library and that the only reading material its roughly 450 inmates were allowed to have were paperback Bibles.
Since then, an attorney for the jail has said inmates are allowed non-Christian religious texts — including vampire and witchcraft texts — as long as the books are soft-sided and meet other physical requirements, such as the absence of staples.
Part of the jail's justification for banning the law journal has included an argument that the publication contains staples, which officials have said could pose a security risk. An attorney for the jail has filed affidavits saying the jail spends thousands of dollars to repair locks, toilets and electrical outlets damaged by inmates trying to tamper with them using staples.
The ACLU, which has asked a federal judge to block the jail's rules while the lawsuit proceeds, also has argued that legal pads with staples in them are available for inmates to purchase at the jail's commissary.
Jury selection has been set for January. Last week, officials from the U.S. Department of Justice — which is part of the lawsuit against the jail — visited the facility, saying they planned to interview non-Christian inmates
Subject: Against Christ or antichrist. Who on the forum does not see any connection with this below policy? Remember Matt. 28:20's Command for some from Christ.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the Editor: (from Elijah)
In Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Spartanburg-Herald you ran the article that John L. Clark filed an affidavit.. that letting prisoners read various materials kept even Supermax prison's safe. And that 'A Bible-only' for inmates at a South Carolina jail is stricter than policies governing reading materials allowed some of the country's most dangerous inmates.
(A Bible-only is requiring No sectarian views)
Even with Mr. Clark being an ex/warden an surely qualified, there is the question of USA Constitutional right's for inmates and their visiting pastor. He uses the words of 'Bible Only'. And the word 'Restricted', which means that no imate or pastor will be allowed to teach Protestant secular teachings. In other words we have South Carolina 'Caesar' telling us what God's Word Tel's us what we are to do.
Acts 5
[27] And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: (S.C. Government) and the high priest asked them,
[28] Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.
[29] Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
It is hard for me to understand how any chaplain or pastor could agree to have their US Civil Right Violated by allowing Government to 'Restrict' what God requires us to teach. Matt. 28:20 Christ said.. 'Teaching them to observe [all things whatsoever I have commanded you..']
So, it is seen by me to be a good start suggesting that the 'RESTRICTIONS' are to strict in the South Carolina prison systems, yet I see it still as A MUCH GREATER MATTER, THAT OF A USA CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT VIOLATION. And you can rest assured that there are both pastor & inmates here in S.C. who have had these rights violated.
aka contrived justification of 'pet doctrine' SDA Saturday sabbath and contrived persecution therefore supposedly legitimizing same doctrine and supposed persecution coming from various 'anti-Christs.'
See? Not that hard to read him.
Even harder to miss this about Sat. Sab:
Romans 14:5
One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.
Is that persecution therefore of the anti-Christ?
Nope.
I could get into the fact that those who do esteem'eth' every day alike are persecuted by SDA'ers though. Is that of the anti-Christ? Yep. Believers of any brand condemning other believers over contrived doctrines is the essence of that working, showing the desire to (insert your favorite form of eternal condemnation) operational in such hearts.
For the record, I do not hold such views against the holders of same. There is an unseen reason at work that is not them, and most don't even know it's happening within them.
s
So what you are saying is that Government is above Gods Word?? And rome surely will love that! Rom. 13 (and that is a question)
And we will see if it is the 7th Day Sabbath keepers who are killers, or the majority of 'other's who think that Caesar is above God's Word.' WE HAVE NO KING BUT CAESAR sounds familiar to me.
And young'in, 'i' could not care less about what day you 'w'orship on. It is your free choice. But God does care! 1 John 2:4 ! And Obad.1:16 will sort out who is right, soon enough.
Subject: Against Christ or antichrist. Who on the forum does not see any connection with this below policy? Remember Matt. 28:20's Command for some from Christ.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the Editor: (from Elijah)
In Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Spartanburg-Herald you ran the article that John L. Clark filed an affidavit.. that letting prisoners read various materials kept even Supermax prison's safe. And that 'A Bible-only' for inmates at a South Carolina jail is stricter than policies governing reading materials allowed some of the country's most dangerous inmates.
(A Bible-only is requiring No sectarian views)
Even with Mr. Clark being an ex/warden an surely qualified, there is the question of USA Constitutional right's for inmates and their visiting pastor. He uses the words of 'Bible Only'. And the word 'Restricted', which means that no imate or pastor will be allowed to teach Protestant secular teachings. In other words we have South Carolina 'Caesar' telling us what God's Word Tel's us what we are to do.
Acts 5
[27] And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: (S.C. Government) and the high priest asked them,
[28] Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.
[29] Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
It is hard for me to understand how any chaplain or pastor could agree to have their US Civil Right Violated by allowing Government to 'Restrict' what God requires us to teach. Matt. 28:20 Christ said.. 'Teaching them to observe [all things whatsoever I have commanded you..']
So, it is seen by me to be a good start suggesting that the 'RESTRICTIONS' are to strict in the South Carolina prison systems, yet I see it still as A MUCH GREATER MATTER, THAT OF A USA CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT VIOLATION. And you can rest assured that there are both pastor & inmates here in S.C. who have had these rights violated.
Hi Small.. one!;) This was my thread & this was the way that 'i' wanted to go with it. It had nothing about advents or the Lord's REQUIRED 7th Day Sabbath in it! (but it is good to see that as Saul of Acts 9 was having mind problems from God, that your (of verse 5) conscience is still with feelings!)
And I asked you trying to get back on track about your thoughts on Ceasar above God as many see in Rom. 13's requirement? And the silence so far finds that you seem to think that that is so? (again with a question mark!) And one on here seem's to side/step the oft/time repeated question of the USA Constitution of Religous Liberty for all people? As the original founders of USA BELIEVED in!
And as the Beasts of Dan. 7 were actual Governments, we see an Rev. 13:11 with a changing from a Lamb Government into a dragon one. And verse 15 on is interesting as well.
So what we will soon see is the change in the USA constitution with an up or down vote instead of the 2/3 majority that heaven had, huh? And the Supreme Court is already 'spirituall' set up for that.
--Elijah
Good Morning Elijah.
One can certainly look at any government authority and cry wolf upon those institutions.
As believers, or at least for myself, I understand that God really does control all the nations and governments, and sets up 'whomever' He will. (see the reference in Daniel if you are familiar with the text)
There is in fact a larger 'Caesar' in play, as noted prior to you personally. That is where the 'Caesar' that rules the darkness of the hearts abides.
When one looks upon any of Gods Words, or those of His Apostles, there are reflections that come forth. You for example have made reflections to the detriment of ignoring other very and just as solid of reflections. Look at the result of those reflections. What is really being shown to 'you' personally in those matters? I see your reflection from your own lips as one of self justification for 'obedience' and the complete ignorance of other just as legitimate reflections to the detriment of other believers.
So you can look at 'Caesar' all you want, ignore the Gods sets up all such powers and also ignore to deal with the reflections from within.
I am not fond of denials, and even less of 'social insurrections' as they are 'things of the world' that I believe God does control, one way or the other.
In that I trust for both of us and observe that the reflection you bring to other believers on matters of Sat. sabbath or any given law where you believe 'you' obey and other believers do not, even though there are clear standings for either one, there is no justification for standings of reflections of detriment to other believers, or to rally for social unrest. And even less to justify your doctrines over such perceived threats. There is a larger Caesar in play in the hearts of all mankind.
And there you are.
enjoy!s
OK: You have just said in this post.. ' I see your reflection from your own lips as one of self justification for 'obedience' ?
So now we see you even knowing what is in my heart. And that is of God who only can read ones heart?
And the Rom. 13 chapter will indeed find you violating Acts 4:28-29 or Dan. 3:14-18 when 666 is Church/Caesar inforced if that posting is accurate at that time period.
--Elijah
You certainly claim 'personal' obedience for Sat. sab. and non pork eating. That is your claim and no loose screw for my reading of same. The other side of your claim you have left unattended for obvious reasons.
I was referring to this statement from Daniel, and no, not limited to only that time period.
Daniel 4:17
This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men.
If you take that as the fact it is, there is no use complaining about your perceived threat. It's Gods gig in any case and you certainly see 'who' He sets up to rule.
enjoy!
s
And about the above?? Surely God permits satan to do his thing, but you can rest assured that it was satan doing the thing! 1 Kings 22:20-22 & N.T. Matt. 4:8-9.
Never did Christ say that satan could not do that, nor that They (the Godhead) had not allowed satan to have Adams lost control!)
And Yes, limited to that time period!;) There will be many saved who even died eating 'pork' & not keeping God's 7th Day Sabbath. What more could God hold them accountable for than doing the best that He had LED THEM to do at that time/period??? Rom. 8:14 (and Hosea 4:6 is again factual)
So: Your personal attack of one posting the Lord's WORD finds 'problems' as 'i' see it! Never have I thought to read ones motives!
That is only between God & their 'CONSCIENCE', if it is still working?
(Gen. 6:3 + Lev. 17:7-9) It appears that the WHOLE bunch of Rev. 17:1-5 do not know the differance between judging a singular persons 'MIND' or 'Maturity' & what God HATES? [FALSE DOCTRINES] which are anti/Christ! against God! Against the One Whose WORD NEVER CHANGES!
And about the WHOLE bunch remark?? Let me qualify that by saying that at this END time/period, to be classed as the ABOMINATION OF THE EARTH by Inspiration, all of these folds as a whole are soon to be as Obad. 1:16 documents. FINISHED for all of ETERNITY. And if one Gen. 4:7 DESIRES to eat pork + lovingly (?) break any of Christ's Eternal Covenant? That is your personal free choice to do so. Have at it for a 'very' short time more! And if one finds OBEDIENCE to Rev. 18:4? Wonderful!
Hi again! Not a bad post except for the BLARING False doctrine of God not having a REQUIRED 24 Hour Day for Worshipping Him on!;) See Mark 7:7 for just one warning of many of them! (you did catch the word of 'DOCTRINE' that 'i' took issue with?)
Surely the 'repairing' below is because most are not in the keeping with His Word, and that remark you gave that Paul's all day's are alike?? Find that one in the 4th Commandment, or on Adam & Eve's FIRST day of life + their first 7th Day Sabbath Sermon for me? (from the Word of God alone, not Jer. 17:5) Perhaps most even think that every day was one of 'spiritual welfare' for the later on son., daughters, servants, + cattle & the like?
Perhaps you are up on the Laws that Moses penned that were NOT INSIDE THE ARK? & the Eternal Covenant Testimony that God alone wrote, that not only was Inside the Ark, but still is!Isa. 58
[12] And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.
[13] If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words:
[14] Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.
OK: Read again Eccl. 3:14 + Heb. 13:8-9 for the Jesus Christ God, 'THAT IS THE SAME FOR EVER'. And the Jehovah Father? See Mal. 3:6 for the same ETERNAL COVENANT One!
And check Rev. 22:9
--Elijah
One can certainly look at any number of 'jots and tittles' of the Law and miss entirely The Spirit and Divine Intentions of same.
The statement of the Apostle isn't going to change to suit your doctrine:
Romans 14:
5 One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike. Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. 6 He that regardeth the day, regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day, to the Lord he doth not regard it. He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, for he giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks.
I regard not your particular day above any other. The Law is Spiritual and I regard it as such, meaning about zero to do with a physical calendar day. On the other hand you are 'forced' by that same Law in the physical observable calendar day to bring condemnation to others, which I view as a violation of the Law.
See how that works?
Paul also stated quite succinctly that the entirety of the "LAW" is fulfilled and 'how' that is in Romans 13:8-10, which again speaks nothing to your particular slant.
I am not 'forced' by my understanding to heap law upon your observation to your condemnation and potential eternal death. You do not have that pleasure available to you. Too bad, really.
One can certainly look at any number of 'jots and tittles' of the Law and miss entirely The Spirit and Divine Intentions of same.
The calendar/physical sabbath is a 'reminder' of our forthcoming promises to be free of sin once and for all without any doubt.
But to turn that reminder on it's ear and use same to heap condemnation is a foul of the dark order and against both the Law of The Spirit and the Intent of same Law. See Romans 13:8-10 for a refresher course. It's quite simple.
It's easy to see where that segmenting has gotten you Elijah. However, you fail entirely at the Law of the Spirit in Romans 13:8-10 whenever you bring condemnation and the potential of eternal death to other believers every time you raise that from your own heart. And THAT is exactly what 'The Law' was meant to rise 'in you' so you could SEE that it is there, in the heart, where the origination of EVIL resides.
In this way you and I understand the Law very differently don't we?
enjoy!
Hi once again. It is the Word of God alone that your judgemetal [[post]] does indeed profane, not me kido!
The verses that I posted are Eternal,
but not so with your scripture/less/posts, from Moses pen in the Book 'NAILED TO THE CROSS'. (Gal. 3:19) The Book of Ordinances that were against us.
But, I do believe in Titus 3:9-11. So have it your way. And it is good to know in advance that with Caesar's ok, that you can then kill all who go against your 'real' knowledge!
--Elijah
Forum:
Only one of two professions God says! A saved Remnant or the Eternally Blotted out of existance antichrist ones, meaning against God!
Just two United groups. 'Matt. 6:24 finds Christ's one Eph. 4:5 Church 'fold', and satan's church's.
Christ's Church is seen in Rev. 12:17 & Rev. 3:10 as Philadelphia. And satan's ones are seen in Matt. 7's Broadway + Rev. 17:1-5 total number of church's These have little in common, except for who their master is, Christ says!
And Surely take note of Rev. 3's last of earth's true fold Laodicea that is also spewed out & became verse 9's synagogue of satan.
As with Philadelphia, she came out of Laodicea's Last Virgin Candlestick as did the Acts Organized One True Church. And as went old Israel, so went (past/tense) the Acts Church, including again Laodicea as repeated history. Eccl. 1:9-10 + Eccl. 3:15. These all are seen UNITED in Matt. 6:24.
Who is left? Read it again! Only the very very few (in comparison) as seen in the first paragraph.
Rev. 12
[17] And the dragon was wroth with the woman, (and in both old & new testament satan became their leader!) and went to make war with the [remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.]
These alone will finish the Rev. 14:6-10 Testimony to the world with the Later Rain (Acts 3:19-Joel 2 as well as Acts 2) & His last day Increased Knowledge of communication will go Earth/wide in the matter of days through persecution in earthly courts!! Some of the Rev. 7:9 ones will be included 'in,' from this message. Yet, this vast number has all of the saved 'remnant' from Adam on as well.
--Elijah