smaller
Member
Do you know all these? Do you realize how SECURE you are in Christ?
Some believers accept the security of the believer, but the notion itself by many is just way too simplistic. A rather childish notion.
Why?
Let's look at a couple of simple examples:
Here is a factual statement of Paul's condition:
Romans 7:21
I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
For purposes of simple observations Paul in the above described the 'evil present' with him as a 'presence' other than himself OR he would have simply stated, "I am evil." IF Paul had come outright and said "I am evil" who would listen to him? I certainly wouldn't. But he didn't say that. Paul differentiated himself from the 'evil present' with him, in his body of death.
He as Gods child, Paul, was totally saved and secure. Does that then 'excuse and authorize' the evil present with Paul?
Uh, no.
That is why 'justifying' the entirety of any believer is utterly futile. None of us can justify our evil thoughts, words or actions in the Name of God and guess what? We 'all' have evil thoughts, words and actions. Are those things authorized, under Grace, Okey Dokey? Uh no. Such things remain rightfully utterly condemned by every measure of scripture. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't have a very accurate picture of themselves.
Let's try the same exercise again using another description that Paul provided about himself:
2 Corinthians 12:7
And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.
Again, there was Paul and there was the messenger of Satan in Paul's flesh. Was Paul secure as a child of God? Of course. No question about it. But also and obviously that was not all that was 'in or with Paul.' IN fact it's pretty easy to connect the dot of that messenger of Satan to the 'evil present' with Paul. For all intents and purposes Paul had a DEVIL in his flesh. Not an illness, not nearsightedness, not any number of other guesswork, but a devil.
Was Paul secure? Beyond any doubt. Was the messenger of Satan in Paul's flesh secure? Uh, no. Not a chance. Not even a remote chance.
That is why the notion is simplistic. Believers who make such claims only show they don't have a very accurate picture of themselves. Not much more than that.
Any believer who admits temptation is 'internal' and of the 'tempter' should see:
A. where the tempter is (between their own two ears)
and
B. they would never try to justify either that worker or his working in them
Pretty simple isn't it?
enjoy!
smaller