• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

How strong is your belief in God?

How strong is your belief in God?

  • 1 - Strong theist. 100 percent possibility of God. In the words of C.G. Jung, 'I do not believe, I k

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 4) Exactly 50 per cent. Completely impartial agnostic. 'God's existence and non-existence are exactl

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 5) Lower than 50 per cent but not very low. Technically agnostic but leaning towards atheism. 'I don

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6) Very low probability, but short of zero. De facto atheist. 'I cannot know for certain but I think

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    18

coelacanth

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
243
Reaction score
0
The poll attached with this question is a reproduction of a scale for self-describing the strength of religious convictions presented in Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion. I'm certain people will like to place themselves more specifically than the 7 available options (for example, as a 2.75 or to say that they are 94% certain, etc) , but the categories seem pretty realistic in that everyone should fall into one of the categories unless they are in absolute turmoil and confusion with the question of God's existence or wavering right on a line between them. I was just curious how the sampling would turn out here. Please just answer as accurately and honestly as you can :-)
 
Woohoo! I win! :-)
 
Should not #1 be the obvious answer on a Christian web-site ??. I know that was mine. :amen
 
samuel said:
Should not #1 be the obvious answer on a Christian web-site ??. I know that was mine. :amen

I was expecting #1 to be the answer a Christian desired to give, but would doubt the intellectual honesty of people involved if #1 is far and away the most frequently occurring answer. Truthfully, a 1 or a 7 scares me, as it acknowledges no possibility - even the most miniscule one - that you are wrong. Marking 1 means it has surpassed faith; that it no longer requires faith for you because you know, doesn't it?
 
Chose #1.
And hardly concerned that those who dont have that sort of knowledge call it 'intellectually dishonest', tho I do pity them because they cannot actually be sure of anything.
Less than 100% belief is UNbelief as the person has doubt.

Based on the views of the OP this verse is meaningless..
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6)
True faith isnt guesswork. It isnt doubt. When I have TRUE FAITH in something I BELIEVE it IS.

G4100
ÀιÃĀεÃÂÉ
pisteuÃ…Â
pist-yoo'-o
From G4102; to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), that is, credit; by implication to entrust (especially one’s spiritual well being to Christ): - believe (-r), commit (to trust), put in trust with.
I would NEVER put my trust with something I did not truly believe in. This is why I am so paranoid when driving. I dont have trust or faith in anything mechanical so I keep my mind constantly alert to mechanical failures in my car, in cars around me and in traffic lights. I dont trust them. I DO trust God because I know He exists and is ultimately taking care of me.
 
coelacanth said:
I was expecting #1 to be the answer a Christian desired to give, but would doubt the intellectual honesty of people involved if #1 is far and away the most frequently occurring answer.
And should this worry those of us who have no doubts ?
Should I deny MY experiences with my relationship with God to appease your sense of logic ?

Truthfully, a 1 or a 7 scares me, as it acknowledges no possibility - even the most miniscule one - that you are wrong.
Have you ever seen Obama in person ?
Prove to me he exists right now as you stand without going anywhere or doing anything.
All you can do is show me pictures or supposed quotes of the man. You cant produce him for ME to see and touch. You know that he exists because the evidence seems to support it.

In my life God has given me unquestionable evidence of His existence, things I would never share on a forum like this again, that make me KNOW that He is. Those who look for reasons to not believe will most likely never get that sort of thing from Him. Only when we are truly searching for Him will He give us that view of Him. Just like He did with Moses when Moses wanted to see...
Marking 1 means it has surpassed faith; that it no longer requires faith for you because you know, doesn't it?
Then you do not understand true BIBLICAL faith which is not about guesswork and doubt. True biblical faith means we BELIEVE without seeing. It doesnt mean 'I THINK'..it means "I BELIEVE.
Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
(Joh 20:29)
 
follower of Christ said:
And should this worry those of us who have no doubts ?
I think so, but you wouldn't understand why.
Should I deny MY experiences with my relationship with God to appease your sense of logic ?
No, you should not do that as appeasement. That would truly be the most shallow of religious faiths if you were to do that.
Have you ever seen Obama in person ?
Prove to me he exists right now as you stand without going anywhere or doing anything.
All you can do is show me pictures or supposed quotes of the man. You cant produce him for ME to see and touch. You know that he exists because the evidence seems to support it.
Exactly. There are massive amounts of evidential support for the existence of Barack Obama, God on the other hand, no. There are some types of faith that are reasonable and others that are not.

[quote:j1i093sh]Marking 1 means it has surpassed faith; that it no longer requires faith for you because you know, doesn't it?
Then you do not understand true BIBLICAL faith which is not about guesswork and doubt. True biblical faith means we BELIEVE without seeing. It doesnt mean 'I THINK'..it means "I BELIEVE.[/quote:j1i093sh]
If what you are really saying is that BIBLICAL faith means "I BELIEVE", then you must have another cryptic meaning for "BELIEVE" because by definition in the common tongue,

BELIEVE: to have confidence in the truth, the existence, or the reliability of something, although without absolute proof that one is right in doing so

Quite notably distinct from 100% certainty of knowledge

Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
(Joh 20:29)
[/quote]

Might as well be another Beatitude saying, "Blessed are the gullible..." It's yet another anti-apostasy device, and nothing holding up the veracity of this assertion.
 
follower of Christ said:
Chose #1.
And hardly concerned that those who dont have that sort of knowledge call it 'intellectually dishonest', tho I do pity them because they cannot actually be sure of anything.
If you really mean, with 100% certainty, no doubt, "I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GOD EXISTS", then it is not intellectually dishonest because that statement is true to the best of your knowledge. I would then question certain other faculties.

Based on the views of the OP this verse is meaningless..
[quote:19l2wmpl]But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6)
[/quote:19l2wmpl]

True, I have many problems with that verse. I was hoping to bring some of those problems into a debate with Biblereader still...
 
coelacanth said:
If you really mean, with 100% certainty, no doubt, "I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GOD EXISTS", then it is not intellectually dishonest because that statement is true to the best of your knowledge. I would then question certain other faculties.
And do you honestly think that you questioning anything has any meaning? :)
Ill put it as plainly for you as possible. I know for a fact that God exists. Im sorry if you are unable to understand why I can say that and know it without my 'faculties' being as poor as you seemingly have to believe they are to make such a statement. :)
If anything, I feel sorry for you for not having that certainty.
True, I have many problems with that verse.
Inevitably...
I was hoping to bring some of those problems into a debate with Biblereader still...
They are certainly problems. Faith in scripture, again, isnt guesswork.
 
coelacanth said:
samuel said:
Should not #1 be the obvious answer on a Christian web-site ??. I know that was mine. :amen

I was expecting #1 to be the answer a Christian desired to give, but would doubt the intellectual honesty of people involved if #1 is far and away the most frequently occurring answer. Truthfully, a 1 or a 7 scares me, as it acknowledges no possibility - even the most miniscule one - that you are wrong. Marking 1 means it has surpassed faith; that it no longer requires faith for you because you know, doesn't it?

coelacanth said:
If you really mean, with 100% certainty, no doubt, "I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GOD EXISTS", then it is not intellectually dishonest because that statement is true to the best of your knowledge. I would then question certain other faculties.

It is obvious you don't have faith in God, but do you not even understand the concept of it?
 
I think so, but you wouldn't understand why.
;)
No, you should not do that as appeasement. That would truly be the most shallow of religious faiths if you were to do that.
unquestionably.
Exactly. There are massive amounts of evidential support for the existence of Barack Obama, God on the other hand, no.
Really ? :)
Are you certain ?
Maybe your own views have caused you to be robbed of such evidence. Maybe God shows Himself in such a way only to those who TRULY seek Him with all their hearts, minds and souls.
And you shall seek Me and find Me, when you search for Me with all your heart.
(Jer 29:13)
There are some types of faith that are reasonable and others that are not.
And who determines which are and arent ? You ?
If what you are really saying is that BIBLICAL faith means "I BELIEVE", then you must have another cryptic meaning for "BELIEVE" because by definition in the common tongue,
What I know is that the word believe has a couple different concepts it presents in english and that you may be going with the one instead of the other.
One of those concepts of belief is far more absolute in nature than you may be understanding. THAT is how belief is presented in scripture overall.
Which is precisely what the one verse presents. WE MUST BELIEVE that He is...there is no 99% hopeful in that statement.
BELIEVE: to have confidence in the truth, the existence, or the reliability of something, although without absolute proof that one is right in doing so
And there you go. Confidence. There is no confidence in 99%, friend. 1% doubt is unbelief.
Quite notably distinct from 100% certainty of knowledge
Sorry but it isnt.
Its odd that when you read the same exact definition you insert 'doubt' into it where I dont see any concept of doubt at all presented.
Again THIS is bibical faith...
But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
(Heb 11:6)
MUST believe that He is...there is no room for 99% there, friend. :)
Might as well be another Beatitude saying, "Blessed are the gullible..." It's yet another anti-apostasy device, and nothing holding up the veracity of this assertion.
Which is your assurance that you will never have true faith in this lifetime. You will need to SEE in order to have true belief.
Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
(Joh 20:29)
Thomas was such a man. Even with evidence he could not have belief. He had to see and touch in order to have that kind of faith.

That said, you seemingly have no clue what things God does to show Himself to those who do seek Him with their entire being. There are things He shows to some who do that those who dont never get to see.
 
Romans 1:19-20
19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

James 1:8
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

Is there really an answer that is acceptable to God other than #1?
 
XTruth said:
Romans 1:19-20
19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

James 1:8
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

Is there really an answer that is acceptable to God other than #1?

:clap
 
XTruth said:
James 1:8
A double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

Is there really an answer that is acceptable to God other than #1?
Great passage
If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of God, who gives to all generously and without reproach, and it shall be given to him. But let him ask in faith, doubting nothing, for he that doubts is like a wave of the sea driven and tossed by the wind. For let not that man suppose that he shall receive anything from the Lord;
(Jas 1:5-7)
If we doubt as some here seem to believe we should then we certainly cannot expect God to give us wisdom.
 
coelacanth,

What you may view as a simply harmless poll of curiosity is an entirely different matter to us Christians. When someone asks us about our faith in God, to answer with a wishy-washy 99.9% is to make room for doubt. There is no room for doubt in the eyes of a true believer in Christ. Our salvation, and yours, is dependent on faith in God's grace and mercy.

Do you want to believe in God? Ask Him to reveal Himself and His Truth to you.
 
JoJo said:
coelacanth said:
samuel said:
Should not #1 be the obvious answer on a Christian web-site ??. I know that was mine. :amen

I was expecting #1 to be the answer a Christian desired to give, but would doubt the intellectual honesty of people involved if #1 is far and away the most frequently occurring answer. Truthfully, a 1 or a 7 scares me, as it acknowledges no possibility - even the most miniscule one - that you are wrong. Marking 1 means it has surpassed faith; that it no longer requires faith for you because you know, doesn't it?

coelacanth said:
If you really mean, with 100% certainty, no doubt, "I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT GOD EXISTS", then it is not intellectually dishonest because that statement is true to the best of your knowledge. I would then question certain other faculties.

It is obvious you don't have faith in God, but do you not even understand the concept of it?

I have intensely studied the Christian God in as many of his myriad forms as I have been able to, from Catholicism, to Lutheranism, to the Coptic Church in Egypt, and even Eastern Orthodox, etc. It depends which concept you are talking about ;) besides that, I do not believe in the following gods that start with "A":

Aa, Aakash, A'akuluujjusi, Aatxe, Aba, Abaangui, Ababinili, Abad, Aba-Inka, Abal, Abandinus, Abarbarea, Abarimon, Abaris, Abarta, Abas, Abassi, Abba, Abdals, Abeguwo, Abellio, Abere, Aberewa, Abhean, Abhijit, Abnoba, Abuk, Abundantia, Abyang-Diriinin, Abydos, Acacallis, Acacia, Academus, Acan/Ah-Chuy-Kak/Ah-Ciliz, Acantha, Acarnan, Acaste, Acat, Acca-Larentia, Acestes, Achachila, Achaeus, Achall, Achaman, Achates, Achelois/-us, Acheron, Achimi, Achiyalatopa, Achtan, Achtland, Acidalia, Acis, Aclla, Acmon, Acoetes, Acolmiztli, Acolnahuacatl/Acolmiztli, Actaea, Acuecucyoticihuati, Ac-Yanto, Acyutah, Adachigahara, Adad, Adamanthea, Adaox, Adapa, Adaro, Adawulcanak, Addanc/Affanc, Adekagagwaa, Adeona, Adephagia, Adhidevata, Adim, Adi-Mailagu, Adimurti, Aditi, Āditya/Pratyūsha, Adjassou-Linguetor, Adjinakou, Adlet, Adlivun, Admete, Admetus, Adonis, Adrammelech, Adroa, Adroanzi, Adsullata, Adur, Adya-Houn'tò, Aeas, Aedon, Aeëtes, Aefsati, Aegaeon, Aegaeus, Aegea, Aegimius, Aegina, Aegir, Aegis, Aegle, Aegyptus, Aello, Aelquntam, Aeneads, Aeneas, Aengus, Aeolus, Aequitas, Aera-Cura, Aericura, Aerten/Aerfen/Aeron, Aesacus, Aesepus, Aesir, Aesma-Daeva, AesSidhe, Aeternitas, Aether, Aethon, Aethra, Aetna, Aetolus, Aeval, Afekan, Afo, Africus, Afrit, Aganippe, Aganju/Aganyu/Agayu, Agarou, A-gaskw, Agassou, Agastya, Agave, Agbala, Agdistis, Agdistis/Angdistis, Agé, Agelasta, Agenor, Aghora, Aglaea, Aglalannawan, Aglaulus, Aglauros, Agloolik, Agni/Anala, agojo-so'jo, Agonalia, Ägräs, Agrius, Agron, Agrona, Agrotora, Aguara, agudar, Agugux', Agunua, Agwe, Agwu, Ahalya, Aha-Njoku, Ahau-Chamahez, Ahau-Kin, Ah-Bolon-Dzacab, Ah-Cancum, Ah-Chembekur, Ah-Chun-Caan, Ah-Cun-Can, Ah-Cuxtal, Ah-Hulneb, Ahi, Ahia-Njok, Ahitescatoneh, Ah-Kin, Ah-Kumix-Uinicob, Ahmad, Ahmakiq, Ah-Mun, Ah-Muzencab, Ahobinagu, Ahoeitu, Aholi, Ahone, Ah-Patnar-Uinicob, Ah-Peku, Ah-Puch, Ahriman, Ahsonnutli, Ah-Tabai, Ahti/Ahto , Ahueccaniae, Ah-Uincir-Dz'acab, Ahuizotle, Ahul, Ahulane, Ahura-Mazda, Ah-Uuc-Ticab, Ai, Aiaru, Äiatar, Aibell, Aide, Aideko, Aife, Aigaion/Briares, Aigamuxa, Aigeiros, Äike, Aillen, Ailuros, Aimend, Ain, Aine, Aipaloovik, Airavata, Airesekui, Aireskouy-Soutanditnr, Airitech, Airmed, Airyaman, Aisoyimstan, Aita, Ai-Tupuai, Ai-Turkish, Aitvaras, Aius-Locutius, Aizan, Aizen-Myoo, Aja, Ajari-Joan, Ajatar, Ajbit, Ajilee, Aji-Shiki, Ajisuke-Takahikone, Ajok, Ajtzak, Aka-Manah, Akbaalia, Akba-atatdia, Akea, Aken, Aker, Akerbeltz, Akert, Akeru, Akh, Akhlut, Akhushtal, Akka, Akkan, Akna, Akongo, Äkräs, Akshayapatra, Akshobhya, Akte/Cypris, Aktunowihio, Aku-Aku, Akuj, Akuma, Akupara, Akycha, Ala, Ala/Ale/Ane, Alaferhviae, Alaghom-Naom/-Tzentzel, Alaisiagae, Alakapuri, Alalahe, Ala-Muki, Alapay-Mishupashup, Alastor, Alateivia, Alaunus, Alauwaimis, Alberich, Alberich, Albino-Spirit-animals, Albiorix, Albunea, Alcestis, Alcippe, Alcis, Alcyone, Alcyoneus, Alecto, Alectrona, Alectryon, Alektca, Alemonia, Alevipoeg, Alexiares, Alfrodull, Alignak, Alilmenehune, Alipugpug, Alisanos, Alkuntam, Allah, Allanque, Allowat-Sakima, Almaviahenae, Almo, Aloadae, Aloeus, Alom, Alom-bag-winno-sis, Alom-begwi-no-sis, Alope, Alowatsakima, Alpan, Alpheus, Alqol-ti-Mani-t'aix, Altjira, Alu, Aluelop, Aluluei, Alunsina, Alupundan, Alur, Alvis, Alyog, Amaa, Ama-arhus, Amadioha, Amadlozi, Amaethaon, Amaguq, Amahraspands, Ama-Itsaso, Amala, Amaltheia, Amalur, Amanikable, Ama-No-Minaka-Nushi, Aman-Sinaya, Amaravati, Amata, Amaterasu, Amathaunta, Amatheia, Amatsu-Kami, Amatsu-Mara, Amatsu-Mikaboshi, Amaunet, Ambika, Ambisagrus, Amen, Amenemope, Amenhotep, Ame-No-Kagase-Wo, Ame-No-Mi-Kumari, Ame-No-Oshido-Mimi, Ame-No-Toko-Tachi, Ame-No-Wakahiko, Ament, Amentet, Amenthes, Amenti, Ameretat, Amesha-Spentas, Am-Heh, Amida, Amimitl, Aminon, Amitabha, Amitayus, Amitolane, Amlak, Ammaca, Amman/Ampal, Ammavaru, Ammit, Ammon, Am-No-Tanabata-Hime, Amor, Amotken, Ampelos, Amphinome, Amphion, Amphiro, Amphithoe, Amphitrite, Amphrysos, Ampu, Ampual, Ampu-at-Paray, Amrita, Amset, Amulius, Amun, Amunet, Amun-Re, Amun-Re-Kamutef, Amurru, Amycus, Amymone, An, Anaisa-Pye, Anakes, Anala, Anan, Ananga, Ananke, Anann, Anansasem, Anansi/Aunt-Nancy, Ananta, Anantesa, Anat, Anath, Anatole, Anatu, Anax, Anaxarete, Anayaroli, anaye, Anbay, Ancamna, Anchanchu, Anchises, Andajus, Andaokut, Andarta, Andhaka, Andhrímnir, Andiciopec, Andjety, Andraste, Andriamanitra, Andvaranaut, Andvari, Anedjti, Anenagi-tayapiwa'ciga, Anerneq, Anextiomarus, Angalkuq, Angatupyry, Angerona, Angiris, Angita, Angitia, Angoro, Angra-Mainyu, Angrboda, Anguta, Angwusnasomtaka, Anhor, Ani, Ani, Anicetus, Ani-Hyuntikwalaski, Anila, Anilaw-ha-Sumagda, Animal-spirits, Aningan, Anito, Anitun-Tabu, Aniwye, Anjea, Ankh, Ankt, Anlabban, anl'tani, Anna, Annaed, Annamar, Annamurti, Annaneptiae, Anna-Perenna, Annapurna, Annat, Annonaria, Annwn, Anog-Ite, Anouke, Ansa, Anshar, Anshitsu, Antaeus, Antariksha/Aha, Antea, Anteros, Antero-Vipunen, Antevorte, Antheia, Anti, Antiope, Antu, Antü, Anu, Anubis, Anuket, Anumati, Anunitu, Anuradha, Anyanwu, Anzu, Ao, Ao-Ao, Aoide, Ao-Kahiwahiwa, Ao-Kanapanapa, Aon, Ao-Nue, Ao-Pakarea, Ao-Potano, Ao-Pour, Ao-Roa, Ao-Takawe, Ap, Apa, Apadel/Kalagang, Apalala, Apam, Apam-Napat, Apam-natat, Apanuugak, Apaosa, Apate, Apep, Aphaea, Aphrodite, Apicilnic, Apidanus, Apikunni, Apis, Apistotoke, Aplu, Apo, Apocatequil, Apolake, Apollo, Apollyon, Apophis/Apep, Apotamkin, Apotequil, Apoyan-Tachi, Appiades, Appias, Apsaras, Apseudes, Apsu, Apu, Apu-Hau, Apu-Illapu, Apu-KoHai, Apu-Mantangi, Apu-Punchau, Aqalax, Aquilo, araburu-kami, Arachne, Aranyani, Arapayan, Arasy, Arawen, Arawn, Arazu, Arcadia, Arcas, Arche, Ardescus, Ard-Greimme, Ardhanari, Ardhanarisvara, Ardra, Ardwinna, Arebati, Aredvi-Sura-Anahita, Arendiwane, Arensnuphis, Areong, Areong-Jong, Areop, Ares, Ares-Lusitani, Arethusa, Arges, Argia, Argiduna, Argus, Ariadne, Ariadne-celtic, Arianrhod, Arishtat, Aristaeus, Arjuna, Arklys, Arktos, Arnakua'gsak, Arnamentia, Aro, Aroonoona, Arria, Artemis, Artio, Artio, Artume, Aruna, Arundhati, Arununa, Arurin, Aruru, Arutam, Arvernus, Arvolecia, Aryaman, Aryman, As, Asa, Asag, Asagwe, Asalluhi, Asase/Yaa/Aberewa/Efua, Asase-Ya, Ascanius, Asch, Asclepius, Asdiwal, A-senee-ki-wakw, Asgaya-Gigagei, Ash, Asha-vahishta, Asherah/Athirat, Ashnan, Ashta-Dikpalas, Ashuku-Nyorai, Asia/Clymene, Asiaq, Asin, Asintmah, Ask-wee-da-eed, Aslesa, Asman, Asmodeus, Asobëe, Asopus, Assanut-li-je, Assur, Astamatara, Astar, Astarte-Ashtoreth, Astennu, Asteria, Asterion, Asterios, Astomi, Asto-Vidatu, Astraea, Astraeus, Astrild, Asura, Asuras, Asvayujau, Aswang, Aswini, Aswins, Asynjur, Atacokai, Ataguchu, Atahensic, Atahocan, Atai, Ataksak, Atanua, Atar, Atarrabi, Ate, Atea, Atégina, Aten, Atergätus, Atharvan, AtharvaVeda, Athena, Athos, Athtart, Aticandika, Atiratu, Atisokan, Atius-Tirawa, Atl, Atla, Atlacamani, Atlacoya, Atlantides, Atlas, Atlas, Atlatonan/Atlatonin, Atlaua, Atman, Aton, Ato-sees, Atri, Atropos, Atshen, Atsolowas, Attis, Atum, Atum-Ra, Atunis, Atys, Au, Audėja, Audhumla, Aueha, Auf, Aufaniae, Auge, Augeas, Aulanerk, Aumakua, Aumanil, Aunggaak, Aura-Mainyu, Aurora, Ausaas, Ausautas, Auseklis, Auslavis, Ausonia, Aušrinė, Auštaras, Auster, Autonoe, Auxesia, Auxo/-esia, Avagdu, Avalloc, Avalou, Avatars-of-Vishnu, Averna, Avernus, Aveta, Awabi, Awaeh-Yegendji, Awakkule, Awes-kon-wa, awe'sus, AwitelinTsta, Awki, Awonawilona, Axius, Axsinginehae, Axular, Aya, Ayaba, Ayauhteotl, Ayida-Weddo, Ayizan, Ayo-Caddi-Aymay, Ayumpum, Ayyanar, Ayyappan, Ayya-Vaikundar, Azacca, Azaka-Tonnerre, Azeban, and Aztec-Skybearers.

That does not even include the rest of the letters of the alphabet. Which version of God do I need to understand to speak with you about it?
 
I have very strong responses, especially to follower of Christ, but they will have to wait till tomorrow. Eyelids are shutting involuntarily... zzzzzzzzz
 
JoJo said:
There is no room for doubt in the eyes of a true believer in Christ.
I believe in Christ, and I have doubts. I guess that makes me a 'false' believer in Christ. Does that mean I go to 'false' heaven or 'false' hell?
 
Back
Top