What really amazes me about these disasters is when the news channels send their "correspondents" into these affected areas to "experience" what everyone is going through. Case in point is CNN has a correspondent going around looking for gas at gas stations trying to figure out what it is like to wait in line for gasoline. Really? All we really need to know is the supply has been limited and many people are not getting what they need because the stations keep running out.
This is why I don't get regular TV at home.
What I really find objectionable about the so called journalism of some TV news shows is that a talkative 'interviewer' says to someone:
'Hi; so you had lots of wind?'
'Yes'
'...and your house was damaged, right?'
'U-huh'
'...and you guys think that Mayor Bloomberg hasn't done enough for you, right?'
'Umm...'
'...but Mayor Bloomberg really hasn't done enough for you, right?'
'Well, I guess not.'
'...and you guys sure are angry, right?'
'...Umm..excuse me?'
'...but surely you guys must be angry, right?'
'...umm, well...'
'..Sure you are. Okay, well thank-you for talking to us, and our viewers will take note of all the things you've told us, that you've had wind damage, that you don't think Mayor Bloomberg has done enough for you, and that you sure are angry.'
...................................
It's this kind of make-it-up-as-you-go interviewing style that I find really objectionable.
But then, there is money in it, because in a macaber and gruesome way it's both entertainment and it's politicized.