Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

I know who's going to be the next Pope!

Tarcisio Bertone would also be the choice if you believe the Prophesy of Saint Malachy, the 12th century priest who predicted there would be 113 popes and then no more before final Judgement. The next Pope is number 113. His Latin nickname is to be "Petrus Romanus"
 
A new man appointed leader will take the blasphemous title of pope. He will reign in his palace on his throne. People will worship him and if time on this earth allows, after he dies, statues(idols) will be made of him that people will pray to and worship. Now for the entertainment: http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=pope+watch+gymnastics&oq=pope+watch+gymn&gs_l=serp.1.0.33i21.135140.143345.1.145329.21.19.2.0.0.0.266.3885.1j6j12.19.0.les%3B..1.0...1c.1.5.psy-ab.noMlo6iBV6A&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&fp=90d91c4868abcf15&biw=1280&bih=648
 
Tarcisio Bertone would also be the choice if you believe the Prophesy of Saint Malachy, the 12th century priest who predicted there would be 113 popes and then no more before final Judgement. The next Pope is number 113. His Latin nickname is to be "Petrus Romanus"
The nickname is part of the prophesy? How long has this Saint Malachy prophecy been around? I've only heard of it since Benedict's election, and sometimes I wonder why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How come it's only after Benedict's election that this prophecy has surfaced? If this prophecy is do detailed and has prophecied the popes for years, why is it only coming to the world's attention now? Why haven't skeptics been discussing this phenomenon?

Maybe if it wasn't buried, knowing about it would have changed it, and it wasn't supposed to be changed? That's the best I can figure. I stumbled upon it as a related youtube video to something I was watching, basically on accident.
 
Maybe if it wasn't buried, knowing about it would have changed it, and it wasn't supposed to be changed? That's the best I can figure. I stumbled upon it as a related youtube video to something I was watching, basically on accident.
As usual, as I figured, the document is a fraud. I don't know why this society allows such propaganda to circulate, but then again, that's part of the world system. The document was declared a fraud 1500 yrs ago by the vatican itself. How sad.
 
As usual, as I figured, the document is a fraud. I don't know why this society allows such propaganda to circulate, but then again, that's part of the world system. The document was declared a fraud 1500 yrs ago by the vatican itself. How sad.

So it's a fraud because the vatican says? [edited by Sparrowhawke]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So it's a fraud because the vatican says? [Edited by SparrowHawke]
The link you provided on the prophecy says the document was accurate up to the time it was first published in the 1590s. It's inaccurate since then, which caused them or anyone else for that matter, to conclude that it's a fraud. [One] would think it was accurate to the last pope! It's not!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MODERATOR VOICE: Care is needed to be certain that our comments are directed toward the subject and not to the person.
 
The "you people" you edit wasn't anything personal. I was referring to those that speak of the document as if it predicted every pope to present without error.
 
The "you people" you edit wasn't anything personal. I was referring to those that speak of the document as if it predicted every pope to present without error.
I don't like doing that any more than you would like it if you were to edit my posts. When I do, I try very hard to keep a fair and even scalpel in my hand and surgically remove damaged tissue so that the "problem" if we may call it that, does no longer have a chance to spread from out of the area to the greater field or domain. In addition it is incumbent on me to treat all as the same, not giving preference to one or another and it is my hope that in this my acts will serve you well. In other words, I try to leave the integrity of the message intact.
 
... cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Benedict's right hand man ...!
Well ...

Not even close.

31313_POPEFRANCIS_20130313_153615.jpg
 
vocalyocal's qupte of part of my statement:
... cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, Benedict's right hand man ...!
You did the right thing by leaving out the word should in my statement.

I figured when the vatican caught wind of my observation, they would alter their votes, that's why I said should in the first place! But guess what? Everyone thought they would elect a young pope, but this guy is the same age as my pick, and has a striking similarity to him too. Go figure.

The deed is done. Let's see if his demeanor changes after his election, as did Benedict's.

Look for the masonic eyes, etc..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You did the right thing by leaving out the word should in my statement.

I figured when the vatican caught wind of my observation, they would alter their votes, that's why I said should in the first place! But guess what? Everyone thought they would elect a young pope, but this guy is the same age as my pick, and has a striking similarity to him too. Go figure.

The deed is done. Let's see if his demeanor changes after his election, as did Benedict's.

Look for the masonic eyes, etc..

Do you really believe that the papal election was altered because of your declaration?
 
Back
Top