Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Because when one considers the totality of what the Bible says on a given topic, it is hardly ever clear. It isn’t a case of the Bible not being believed, it’s that what we believe the Bible to be saying is different from others.
- *Salvation is Eternal
- *God calls women to ministry
- *We can never lose our eternal life
- *________________________insert your favorite here.
Subjective personal interpretation then?Unfortunately, the Bible "says" as we, individually, happen to believe.
I would agree.Because when one considers the totality of what the Bible says on a given topic, it is hardly ever clear. It isn’t a case of the Bible not being believed, it’s that what we believe the Bible to be saying is different from others.
I don't think that God necessarily, nor always, inspires "his word to be interpreted" (if I have understood your statement correctly), which is why it is interpreted differently.I would agree.
Christianity is monotheist. One God. How then do we explain the one God over all things inspiring his word to be interpreted as differently by each one who reads it. As you have observed?
Quite right.One of my favorite things to say is that "The Bible doesn't say anything." That's because WE infer from the text. It really boils down to what brother Free said here: http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...o-be-believed-when-it-says.74099/post-1419620
That said, there are certain things we must agree on. Otherwise we stray out of Orthodoxy. The Nature of Christ and the death and physical resurrection of Jesus. That Jesus was/is the God/man. I'm sure we can add to this list. But my point is that there are essentials and then there are non-essentials to the Faith.
Well, do you believe as the Catholics believe? The JW's? The Mormons? The Westboro Baptists? The SDA's?Subjective personal interpretation then?
I would agree.
Christianity is monotheist. One God. How then do we explain the one God over all things inspiring his word to be interpreted as differently by each one who reads it. As you have observed?
Subjective personal interpretation then?
I would agree.
Christianity is monotheist. One God. How then do we explain the one God over all things inspiring his word to be interpreted as differently by each one who reads it. As you have observed?
While it doesn't make something true, one had better have very solid reasons for rejecting orthodox Christian belief (the deity of Jesus and his literal, physical resurrection, for example). Hence why Mormons and JWs are not Christians.Again, it is sad, but "Orthodoxy" only means: As is 'traditionally' accepted. And that honestly does not make something true. Jesus xonstantly mentioned "traditional" views, and went on to say: "But, I tell you......"
Very true, all you said. However, the criteria and encompassing theology many of us (our denominations) label "necessary to believe" probably places one heckuva strain on the original message Jesus taught.While it doesn't make something true, one had better have very solid reasons for rejecting orthodox Christian belief (the deity of Jesus and his literal, physical resurrection, for example). Hence why Mormons and JWs are not Christians.
As Papa Zoom rightly pointed out, there are things necessary to believe for one to be a Christian, but there are other things which I believe God really does want us to wrestle with. It's the process that matters with those things, not necessarily the conclusion.
True. It is when the non-essentials are made essential that things rapidly fall apart, although there is even some disagreement on what is essential and what is not. But, for the most part, there are things which have been historically held to by practically all Christians, as you know--creation of and fall of man, monotheism, deity of Jesus, his physical death and resurrection, his return, etc.Very true, all you said. However, the criteria and encompassing theology many of us ( our denominations) label "necessary to believe" probably places one heckuva strain on the original message Jesus taught.
Is a child weaned from milk? And then as faith progresses from taking in the word, we can grow from good will of God, and from there to the acceptable will of God, and finally to the perfect will of God (Rom 12:2). It’s correct that we all don’t read things the same.How then do we explain the one God over all things inspiring his word to be interpreted as differently by each one who reads it. As you have observed?
And, interestingly, if you take only the specific things Jesus ever spoke of as being necessary for belief in Him, there are likely a good dozen (or more) "requirements" the different denominations lay on people to 'allow' them to be Christians.True. It is when the non-essentials are made essential that things rapidly fall apart, although there is even some disagreement on what is essential and what is not. But, for the most part, there are things which have been historically held to by practically all Christians, as you know--creation of and fall of man, monotheism, deity of Jesus, his physical death and resurrection, his return, etc.
Is a child weaned from milk? And then as faith progresses from taking in the word, we can grow from good will of God, and from there to the acceptable will of God, and finally to the perfect will of God (Rom 12:2). It’s correct that we all don’t read things the same.
Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
Isa 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
I just posted this following scripture on another reply, but does God receive them that believe they should only certain foods, and also them that believe they can eat everything? (Rom 14:3)
John described this growth in the body of Christ as progressing from little children, to young men, to fathers in 1 Jn 2:13. I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one. I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father.Roman's 12 is speaking of the perfect will of God. Not that humans can become perfect.
Matthew 5:48 ►Be you therefore perfect, even as your Father who is in heaven is perfect.
"Perfect" - Greek: τελειος adjective - nominative singular masculine
teleios tel'-i-os: complete (in various applications of labor, growth, mental and moral character, etc.); neuter completeness -- of full age, man, perfect.
Matthew 5:44 "But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you
This is a big one that is totally ignored and not believed