W
Wertbag
Guest
I was watching a Christian ministry show on TV where the minister was attempting to show some confusion in the widely held belief that hell is eternal torment. He had come to the conclusion that hell and the lake of fire is correct, but that being tossed into the lake of fire was to destroy the soul and thereby end your existance rather than to continue punishing the person for ever.
I didn't get a chance to note the various scripture references he had, but his claim was that the word Hell in the Bible was translated differently in different versions, and that the most common translation should have been "grave" and not "hell". If that is correct then it would mean those judged unworthy would simply be destroyed or dead, whereas the choosen would live for eternity.
It did seem to fix the major problem of the punishment not fitting the crime. The guy believed the common idea of hell was inspired by Dante's writings and more recently from hollywood views.
Has anyone heard of this variation? Does it make sense?
I didn't get a chance to note the various scripture references he had, but his claim was that the word Hell in the Bible was translated differently in different versions, and that the most common translation should have been "grave" and not "hell". If that is correct then it would mean those judged unworthy would simply be destroyed or dead, whereas the choosen would live for eternity.
It did seem to fix the major problem of the punishment not fitting the crime. The guy believed the common idea of hell was inspired by Dante's writings and more recently from hollywood views.
Has anyone heard of this variation? Does it make sense?