Barbarian
Member
The problem now comes to a head. What on earth does all this violent flood imagery in Scripture contribute to theology and spirituality? What did communities of faith hear in the flood story that impelled them to preserve the Noah episode as authoritative Scripture? Why risk retelling a violent, originally polytheistic story, demeaning of human life, which, in an earlier (18th century BCE) Babylonian version called Atra-Hasis described petty gods destroying humanity because their loud din prevented a good night’s sleep? Tablet 1, lines 355–60 speak of earth “bellowing like a bull” so that Enlil complained, “I cannot stand this uproar, I cannot sleep!” “Send an epidemic!”Show me how it is not that way in Scripture.
The Scriptures make a critical appropriation of polytheistic material like this for compelling reasons, which include both co-opting the archetypal truths to which the mythology witnesses and simultaneously debunking the mythology’s polytheistic misconceptions.
What Was Noah’s God Thinking?
A Scholar of Hebrew Scriptures Takes On a Huge “WTF?” in the Book of Genesis
medium.com
I just showed you that the Bible isn't a science book. If you try to get that kind of content from the Bible, you'll be always disappointed. It doesn't support electricity, or cellular structure, or evolution, or x-rays, or any of many, many things that are obviously true.If you want to believe in evolution, go ahead. Just quit trying to use the Bible to support it. It does not.
That's wrong. It merely sees evidence and uses that to make conclusions. Hence, Darwin's theory has been repeatedly modified to fit the evidence.Concerning evolution, science sees what it wants to.