[Is Jesus Christ a created being (begotten son) or has he always existed alongside God the father (eternal son)?
.…He is the divine son of God, who bridges the gap between humanity and God, offering us salvation and a restored relationship with the creator....]
Sidelining the Creeds, I’d downrate the term
begotten as appertaining to the Greek NT, and it can cause absolute mayhem if dropped into Jhn.1:18 as a polytheistic begotten-god, as the NASB95 was guilty of saying. [The unique [
son, himself] deity], covers John’s text there. I’d also drawn a distinction between Jesus the christ, and God the son: there was never a time when the noncarnate son was not; there was a time when the incarnate son was not.
Jesus is the permanent temporal mode of the uncreated eternal second person of deity. The beyond-time pool has streamed and incarnated into time as Jesus, who was conceived by the spirit and begotten of Mary, the christotokos. That she bore is not
God, nor even
God the son, but is
God the son as a human being: theologically here, truncation is travesty. Thus he lacked the omnis (omnipresence, etc), though had one-of-a-kind deificity, or as I think we may say aright, divinity but not deity. To sing “You alone are God, Jesus!” is popular and heretical.
As for the θεος/theos texts Jhn.1:1,18, Rm.9:5, Tts.2:13, and 2 Pt.1:1, I’d favour the NET above the pack, with the NWT at the bottom of the pack. As raw data they powerfully point in blunt towards a trinitarian and christological understanding.
Rather than [a restored relationship]—a prodigal idea—I’d say a new relationship; not going back to Adam 1, but moving into Adam 2, an exodus towards Canaan, not back to Egypt.