- May 22, 2012
- 13,128
- 4,333
Don't have the energy nor desire to argue, but will put a little two cents in here.
I think of legalism as stating restrictions and the like, stuff that has no major impact on important doctrine, that aren't scriptural as if they are, or using verses out of context for the purpose of making a case on one such an issue. But obviously not everyone agrees on the small specifics of what is scriptural and what is not. The church I grew up in swears up and down that scripture supports the idea that the KJV is the only real Bible in English. I believe they are hugely mistaken in that area. But to them it is the truth, something they dare not question, and they have apologetics on it that you could debate endlessly with them on.
Even if wrong, they have a right to that belief. All I can do is respectfully disagree.
I think of legalism as stating restrictions and the like, stuff that has no major impact on important doctrine, that aren't scriptural as if they are, or using verses out of context for the purpose of making a case on one such an issue. But obviously not everyone agrees on the small specifics of what is scriptural and what is not. The church I grew up in swears up and down that scripture supports the idea that the KJV is the only real Bible in English. I believe they are hugely mistaken in that area. But to them it is the truth, something they dare not question, and they have apologetics on it that you could debate endlessly with them on.
Even if wrong, they have a right to that belief. All I can do is respectfully disagree.