researcher
Member
correct! lolHebrews 9 has nothing to do with Rome.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
correct! lolHebrews 9 has nothing to do with Rome.
So no one has blasphemed the name of God since 70AD? You are aware that the position of Pontifex Maximus is related to the Roman emperors and taken by the Papacy right? That's why the pope is called "pontif."researcher said:The verse below is predictive prophecy.
Sorry, it's all done.
RND said:So no one has blasphemed the name of God since 70AD? You are aware that the position of Pontifex Maximus is related to the Roman emperors and taken by the Papacy right? That's why the pope is called "pontif."researcher said:The verse below is predictive prophecy.
Sorry, it's all done.
Well then Rev. 13 couldn't have happened.researcher said:Has anyone defamed God? Sure. I'm sure it happens all of the time, lol.
Of course it's true.Col 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:
Col 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
Is the statement in bold true?
Sure, why wouldn't I?Actually I should say, do you believe that that statement is true?
RND said:Well then Rev. 13 couldn't have happened.researcher said:Has anyone defamed God? Sure. I'm sure it happens all of the time, lol.
Of course it's true.[/quote:3eb520ba][quote:3eb520ba]Col 1:12 Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light:
Col 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Col 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:
Is the statement in bold true?
Sure, why wouldn't I?[/quote:3eb520ba][quote:3eb520ba] Actually I should say, do you believe that that statement is true?
Of course it's true.
God's eternal law prohibits blasphemy against God. But the deeper point is that this beast blasphemes God by claiming to be God. As I pointed out earlier this is something the papacy asserts.researcher said:People can't talk badly about God after that? Lol. Why not?
Are you serious? You claim to be a Christian and you ask such a question?OK. And the proof that it's true is..?
Are you serious? You claim to be a Christian and you ask such a question?[/quote:1irks492][quote:1irks492]OK. And the proof that it's true is..?
researcher said:Are you serious? You claim to be a Christian and you ask such a question?[quote:30w282xl]OK. And the proof that it's true is..?
RND said:Are you serious? You claim to be a Christian and you ask such a question?[quote:dcrk5l2j]OK. And the proof that it's true is..?
Wow, you are serious. Do you read the same Bible that I do? If you did you'd understand that's all the proof needed. Verse after verse proclaims the truth of the promises made.
The Bible says this about it's self. The writers of the Bible were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Thus to suggest that the Bible isn't true (every word of it) is to suggest the Holy Spirit didn't tell the truth to it's authors - if that's the case then God would be a liar.researcher said:OK. So basically you're saying, if it says it in the Bible, it must be true. Would this be a correct assumption?
RND said:The Bible says this about it's self. The writers of the Bible were inspired by the Holy Spirit. Thus to suggest that the Bible isn't true (every word of it) is to suggest the Holy Spirit didn't tell the truth to it's authors - if that's the case then God would be a liar.researcher said:OK. So basically you're saying, if it says it in the Bible, it must be true. Would this be a correct assumption?
So yes, your assumption would be correct. Every word of the Bible is true.
Yes, I believe this will happen one day whether I am alive or dead. BTW have you considered that Jesus was referring to the second death?researcher said:So then you believe that...
Mat 16:24 Then said Jesus unto his disciples,
Mat 16:27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
Mat 16:28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Question: Was Jesus equating Israel with the world? In other words, was He considering the future of a world full of Christians that are part of the nation of Israel? Also, have you considered that as Jesus was giving a prelude to the work of the Gospel commission He was referring to His resurrection?Mat 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
Mat 10:6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Mat 10:23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee into the next: for verily I say unto you,
Ye shall not have gone through the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
Nope.The Son of man came back before some of those disciples died, and before they finished going through Israel.. Right?
Lol. No. Jesus didn't talk to his disciples in parables like he did the crowds. He explained everything to them in simple terms so they would understand. Mat 13:10-16, Mar 4:34have you considered that Jesus was referring to the second death?
Then maybe you can explain why the disciple to explain His parables to them if He hadn't spoken to them in parables?researcher said:Lol. No. Jesus didn't talk to his disciples in parables like he did the crowds.
He spoke to them in parables and explained the parables to his disciples.He explained everything to them in simple terms so they would understand. Mat 13:10-16, Mar 4:34
Except He wasn't referring to His second coming.Mat 16:24-28 fits perfectly with the other things Jesus said such as...
Mat 24:34 Remember that all these things will happen before the people now living have all died.
---------------------------------------------------
Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all these things be accomplished.
Except He wasn't referring to His second coming.[/quote:3qzsg4v9]RND said:Then maybe you can explain why the disciple to explain His parables to them if He hadn't spoken to them in parables?researcher said:Lol. No. Jesus didn't talk to his disciples in parables like he did the crowds.
He spoke to them in parables and explained the parables to his disciples.He explained everything to them in simple terms so they would understand. Mat 13:10-16, Mar 4:34
[quote:3qzsg4v9]Mat 16:24-28 fits perfectly with the other things Jesus said such as...
Mat 24:34 Remember that all these things will happen before the people now living have all died.
---------------------------------------------------
Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all these things be accomplished.
He wasn't referring to His second coming.
They didn't understand completely in what the Messiah's mission was. That is why that even after His death and resurrection they asked Him if He was going to take Israel back.researcher said:[Everything was made clear to his disciples.
Mat 13:11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Mar 4:34 But without a parable spake he not unto them: and when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples.
[quote:3q40o590]He wasn't referring to His second coming.
Did this happen in 70AD? If so why did He tell people to flea Jerusalem?Mat 24:31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
Right. Did Israel bear fruit?Mat 24:32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh:
Sanctuary language.Mat 24:33 So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.
Exactly. All the things Jesus referred to regarding "this generation" came to pass.Mat 24:34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
That would be assuming I believe Jesus returned in 70ADSo what coming was it?
Did all the tribes of the earth see Jesus coming in the clouds with power and great glory in 70AD?