Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Thank you for correcting my spelling; I had it wrong also.......When you say this to me, 'mildly can support not fanciful interpretation', you are responding in a pejorative way to me. I apologise for my incorrect earlier spelling of pejorative.
Not truly an argument to begin with, Oz, just a question and an explanation of why I thought that question might be relevant to the conversation.That is argument from silence, which is a logical fallacy.
It would have been a deviation from the purpose which he was sent to accomplish.Would Jesus have been a perfect man if He had taken a wife and had children knowing that He would die leaving behind a widow and children? Would this be an act of self-indulgence or weakness in the flesh?
Not truly an argument to begin with, Oz, just a question and an explanation of why I thought that question might be relevant to the conversation.
But please excuse me, I am not in your class as a debater. I leave you to your lecture.
It would have been a deviation from the purpose which he was sent to accomplish.
Luk 19:10 “for the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.”
After all these years you still don't know how to post?222....LOLtest post
Storm Troopers have a sense of humor.After all these years you still don't know how to post?222....LOL
I see that hand!test post
The Bible says that we will all meet God during our lives, and many Saints over the years have reported meeting Jesus, they make better witnesses than an old document, when many such documents written about Jesus at the time are patently made up. There were many groups who claimed that Jesus was a part of their group, in a similar way that many Gurus claim to be Jesus today, the Bible predicts them. Saints who have met Jesus testify that He is non practicing.
An interesting perspective. It might have more impact if in your avatar you were not wearing an upside down broken cross though. To conclude that you might be correct though one must; a. conclude that Jesus lies to us when we read He will not set foot on the earth again before He returns to rule for a thousand years or b. conclude that He was talking out of His rear end when He had that included in the scriptures.The Bible says that we will all meet God during our lives, and many Saints over the years have reported meeting Jesus, they make better witnesses than an old document, when many such documents written about Jesus at the time are patently made up. There were many groups who claimed that Jesus was a part of their group, in a similar way that many Gurus claim to be Jesus today, the Bible predicts them. Saints who have met Jesus testify that He is non practicing.
You should be careful what you say about scripture; comments like what you made are not looked upon favorably here.......they make better witnesses than an old document,
Your post seems to have what I consider "elements of Mormonism" in it.The Bible says that we will all meet God during our lives, and many Saints over the years have reported meeting Jesus, they make better witnesses than an old document, when many such documents written about Jesus at the time are patently made up. There were many groups who claimed that Jesus was a part of their group, in a similar way that many Gurus claim to be Jesus today, the Bible predicts them. Saints who have met Jesus testify that He is non practicing.
So do you reject the authority of the New Testament?The Bible says that we will all meet God during our lives, and many Saints over the years have reported meeting Jesus, they make better witnesses than an old document, when many such documents written about Jesus at the time are patently made up.
When the member's complete post is quoted the reference he makes to the Bible makes it clear he is talking about other writings then the Bible .. to me any way..The Bible says that we will all meet God during our lives, and many Saints over the years have reported meeting Jesus, they make better witnesses than an old document, when many such documents written about Jesus at the time are patently made up. There were many groups who claimed that Jesus was a part of their group, in a similar way that many Gurus claim to be Jesus today, the Bible predicts them. Saints who have met Jesus testify that He is non practicing.
Jumping to unwarranted conclusions is not just a Olympic event in track and field!When the member's complete post is quoted the reference he makes to the Bible makes it clear he is talking about other writings then the Bible .. to me any way..
Professor Karen King of Harvard Divinity School is promoting the view that Jesus was married and had a wife, based on a fragmentary document from the 4th century. I recommend the reply to her by Dr Albert Mohler, The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife? When Sensationalism Masquerades as Scholarship.
If you want Prof King's view, see this article in the Boston Globe, 'Harvard professor identifies scrap of papyrus suggesting some early Christians believed Jesus was married'.
What are the errors in Professor King's thinking regarding this information about Jesus' alleged wife? Could Dr Mohler be wrong in his assessment? If so, how?
Oz
It seems so rediculous that such an idea would be put forth based upon one tiny fragment,, yet ignoring the thousands of ancient parchments and writings attesting that Jesus never married.