handy said:stranger said:The alernative is living in sin, so to what are Christians called?handy said:What will happen if we don't live sinfree?
I don't agree that this is an either/or situation: Either we live totally sinless or we are living in sin. This isn't Biblical. What is Biblical is that we are new creatures in Christ with the old passing away and we are becomming new. We can live our lives according to God's purposes, and yet still stumble in sin. Stumbling in sin isn't the same as living in sin.
Is the old passing away or has it passed away? Is the new coming or has it come? Let's compare the following two:
1. If anyman is in Christ he is becoming a new creation, the old is passing away, the new is coming.
2. If anyman is in Christ he is a new creation, the old has passed away, behold the new has come.
[quote:c82b1]Take for example Peter. Long after Pentecost, when he became recognized as a leader, if not the leader of the church at Jerusalem, he still sinned in the matter of being hypocritical towards the Gentiles.(Galatians 2:11) Are we going to say then that Peter was "living in sin"? Of course he wasn't.
If Peter continued being hypocritical towards the Gentiles, and that was a sin in God's eyes then yes, he would be living in sin.
There are those who will testify to just about anything. Sorry if I sound a little cynical. The problem is, for as long as I've been associated with the Church of the Nazarene, (over 20 years now) I've only heard of those who will testify that such persons exist. I've yet to hear anyone actually say that they themselves have this totally sin-free existence. One thing I appreciate about the Church of the Nazarene is that, while this is part of their official doctrine, they never push it or put anyone down for not agreeing with it, and even in the official handbook of the church, the doctrine is taught as a secondary outpouring of the Spirit, not as something that anyone can achieve just by really good living.
Frankly, I can imagine that there may indeed be saints, probably older, who have lived their lives so totally within God's will that they may not sin in deed or thought. I'm not saying that it's impossible, for nothing is impossible with God.
What I am saying is that it is neither normal nor, more importantly Biblical. Stranger, if the Bible taught that we must achieve totally sin-free living on this planet, then I would agree with the principle. But it doesn't. Every text that speaks of our perfection, speaks of it as the ultimate outcome of our walk in faith, something that God bestows upon us at the time of His not that we would achieve that outcome here on this earth. As you say, part of the age to come. And, it's a wonderful hope that we all have in Christ.
You use the word 'must', I use the term 'calls'. God calls us to depart from all sin - that and nothing less is both His standard and expectation. Another of God's standards is to hate admixture. Let me ask you this: Does God call you to depart from all sin?
stranger said:I think being free from sin starts by considering ourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.
Now this I am in total agreement with. We are alive in Christ Jesus, and it is by Him and through Him that we will ultimately be sin-free. Until then, we are to strive towards that goal by agreeing that God's will is good, and that our natural desires are against His perfect will.
Agreed, I would strive to enter His rest though, which is a ceasing from works.
vic mentioned Paul, and he is a good example for this as well. Note the language Paul used with Timothy, "of whom I am the chief". Am, present tense. Also, in Romans hear his anguished cry, "Wretched man that I am". Paul had no difficulty presenting himself honestly as still a sinner yet to be perfected.
Yes, Paul called himself the chief of sinners, because he persecuted the church of God. My point is did Paul keep on persecuting the church or did he stop? The cry is indeed: wretched man that I am, who will deliver me from this body of death? What do the next few words say? Thanks be to God. . .
[/quote:c82b1]Again, my main beef against the idea of 'sinless living' is that it places an unrealistic burden upon others. That was the main sin of the Pharisees. We need to learn from their mistakes.
We are called to love our neighbour not burden them. A serious consideration of sin and sinfulness is burdensome to self - my intention is not to burden others (as believers are already burdened), and Jesus did say in Matthew 11:29 "Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and YOU WILL FIND REST FOR YOUR SOULS." The only way to be unburden is to get rid of the burden of sin.