- After his stay in Arabia and Damascus (Galatians 1, 18), Paul speaks of a first meeting with Peter and James, then of a second meeting (that of the Council) which he places “after fourteen years” (Galatians 2, 1). This therefore means that Paul has already made two mission trips, and not just one. The assembly would therefore have taken place in the year 51.
- Paul, during his travels, founded several communities in the Greek environment. The problem of welcoming non-Jews then arises: should they be circumcised to mark their belonging to the Christian community? Do they have to observe food prohibitions and all the laws of Moses? It is therefore very likely that the meeting took place after the second trip, that is to say when the number of non-Jewish converts became more important.
- The consequences of this meeting in the history of Christianity are such that some will later call it the "Council of Jerusalem", which would suggest a well-structured assembly, bringing together many people. We must think rather of a meeting of some representatives of the Church of Antioch with James, Peter and John, of the Church of Jerusalem. Even though it is a private meeting, no other council has made such important decisions as that of Jerusalem. Without this "first council", the others would not have been possible.
- For these believers in Jerusalem, there is no question of living in community with non-Jews, nor of sharing meals with those who are not circumcised and who do not respect all the dietary prescriptions of the Law. This restrictive attitude does not fit with the experience of Diaspora Jews who were much more open to non-Jews because they lived with them.
- In Jerusalem, Paul brought Titus, a young man whom we have not yet met. He is an Antiochian who recently became a Christian. He had great hopes for the man who would become one of his greatest collaborators. He calls him “his true son in the same faith” (Titus 1, 4). For Paul, this young man is living proof of the noble fruits that were already growing on the tree of the Gentile Church. In Jerusalem, one could not resist the charm of this Christian from the non-Jewish world. "I went up to Jerusalem," wrote Paul. I also took Titus.” He tells us that he was born to a pagan family and uncircumcised. This detail is provided by Luke who adds that “the Church of Antioch provided the necessary funds for the journey of its three representatives.” (Acts 15, 3)
- In Jerusalem, everyone was aware that the attitude that would be adopted towards Titus would be of capital importance for the future of the Gospel. Titus symbolically represented all the Pagan-Christian Churches. If he were accepted unconditionally, as a full brother, it would be a decision applicable to all non-Jewish Christians in the new communities.
- For Paul, the problem was posed as follows: Is salvation the fruit of the grace of Christ? Is circumcision necessary for salvation or is Christ's grace sufficient? This question of principle was very important. Once decided, Paul will be able to allow the practice of circumcision, as will be the case with Timothy, who had a Jewish mother.
- In Jerusalem, Peter, James and John accepted Paul's point of view. The emerging Church thus avoided a conflict which would have been catastrophic and would have relegated Christianity to the rank of a “Judaizing sect”.
- After the meeting, the apostles and elders decided to send two delegates to Antioch, Judas and Silas, “prominent figures among the brothers”, who would travel with Paul and Barnabas. They were given a letter which explained James' proposal: "The Holy Spirit and we have decided to impose no burden on you other than these inevitable requirements: to abstain from the meat of pagan sacrifices, from the blood of suffocated animals and from immorality. If you avoid all this carefully, you will have done well. Farewell!" (Acts 15, 28-29)
- We thus arrived at a compromise acceptable to both groups: The non-Jewish Christians accepted the rules set out by James and the Jewish-Christians did not force the non-Jews to be circumcised. The two groups could thus find themselves at the same table.
______________________________________________________________________________
- Paul, during his travels, founded several communities in the Greek environment. The problem of welcoming non-Jews then arises: should they be circumcised to mark their belonging to the Christian community? Do they have to observe food prohibitions and all the laws of Moses? It is therefore very likely that the meeting took place after the second trip, that is to say when the number of non-Jewish converts became more important.
- The consequences of this meeting in the history of Christianity are such that some will later call it the "Council of Jerusalem", which would suggest a well-structured assembly, bringing together many people. We must think rather of a meeting of some representatives of the Church of Antioch with James, Peter and John, of the Church of Jerusalem. Even though it is a private meeting, no other council has made such important decisions as that of Jerusalem. Without this "first council", the others would not have been possible.
- For these believers in Jerusalem, there is no question of living in community with non-Jews, nor of sharing meals with those who are not circumcised and who do not respect all the dietary prescriptions of the Law. This restrictive attitude does not fit with the experience of Diaspora Jews who were much more open to non-Jews because they lived with them.
- In Jerusalem, Paul brought Titus, a young man whom we have not yet met. He is an Antiochian who recently became a Christian. He had great hopes for the man who would become one of his greatest collaborators. He calls him “his true son in the same faith” (Titus 1, 4). For Paul, this young man is living proof of the noble fruits that were already growing on the tree of the Gentile Church. In Jerusalem, one could not resist the charm of this Christian from the non-Jewish world. "I went up to Jerusalem," wrote Paul. I also took Titus.” He tells us that he was born to a pagan family and uncircumcised. This detail is provided by Luke who adds that “the Church of Antioch provided the necessary funds for the journey of its three representatives.” (Acts 15, 3)
- In Jerusalem, everyone was aware that the attitude that would be adopted towards Titus would be of capital importance for the future of the Gospel. Titus symbolically represented all the Pagan-Christian Churches. If he were accepted unconditionally, as a full brother, it would be a decision applicable to all non-Jewish Christians in the new communities.
- For Paul, the problem was posed as follows: Is salvation the fruit of the grace of Christ? Is circumcision necessary for salvation or is Christ's grace sufficient? This question of principle was very important. Once decided, Paul will be able to allow the practice of circumcision, as will be the case with Timothy, who had a Jewish mother.
- In Jerusalem, Peter, James and John accepted Paul's point of view. The emerging Church thus avoided a conflict which would have been catastrophic and would have relegated Christianity to the rank of a “Judaizing sect”.
- After the meeting, the apostles and elders decided to send two delegates to Antioch, Judas and Silas, “prominent figures among the brothers”, who would travel with Paul and Barnabas. They were given a letter which explained James' proposal: "The Holy Spirit and we have decided to impose no burden on you other than these inevitable requirements: to abstain from the meat of pagan sacrifices, from the blood of suffocated animals and from immorality. If you avoid all this carefully, you will have done well. Farewell!" (Acts 15, 28-29)
- We thus arrived at a compromise acceptable to both groups: The non-Jewish Christians accepted the rules set out by James and the Jewish-Christians did not force the non-Jews to be circumcised. The two groups could thus find themselves at the same table.
______________________________________________________________________________