Quick points:
I first read about the separation of spirit and soul via books of Watchman Nee many years ago, and I have learnt since then that he jumbled a fair few teachings on theology. What I remember is that he believed that soul had many different characteristics to spirit. I had the impression he believed that soul was part of the flesh, and only spirit was renewed after being born again. Therefore personality, temperament, personal strengths/ weaknesses wouldn't be altered.Any thoughts on (my interpretation of) Nee's viewpoint?
If soul refers to personal temperament etc, how does a Christian differentiate between loving with heart and soul?
Is it possible to love with heart and mind but not soul? What would the fruit of not loving God with soul look like?
I would agree with you, soul does not need to be changed in this aspect..
It is the way you were created, misused by the sin in us but never the less you are still you.
A Word on Nee and those that have had something to say to the body.
They were deep writers for their time, God has used them immensely, did they know it all, no, did they make statements that sounded odd at times, yes.
But they furthered the body, they searched the word of God to feed meat to their listeners.
I'm trying not to get to cynical because of the times we live in and money is such an issue.
A book a week flies off the shelves by our best sellers, on how to do something, no meat just how to fix your christian life.
We have our deep writers that have come from these writers of old, its called progressive.
Present truth Peter calls it, we glean from each other, listening to the HolySpirit for the truth of God's word.
We have men and women such as Dwight Davis, Don Byrd, Linda Kenebrew, Warren litzman and many more.
In my opinion Will one day go down as the finest writers of our time.
Their not as well known as some, as far as I know, but they have something to say.