[__ Science __ ] One of Evolution’s Most Famous Stories Gets a Rewrite

[journeymanisnothing]

So... nothing but you think so?

No my friend. I mean all of our Lords' allegories were told for the purpose of describimg himself and mankinds reaction toward him. They apply to past present and future because believers (who become live in every age being conformed to his image.
You're focused on when?, instead of why?

The old "appearance of age" idea that makes God out to be deceptive.

Only according to evolutionists, but I've already demonstrated from scripture why the universe only appears very old.

 

[Consecrated Life]

We know the "days" were not literal ones, since you cannot have mornings and evenings with no sun to have them. The point is, God tells us what was there at the beginning of creation, and male and female were not there.

divide the time up any way you want, the fact remains that Jesus Christ says all the animals were created pre-Adam.

Gen 1:25
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

 

[journeymanisnothing]

I know you want to believe that, but there's no reason to imagine so. Allegories are not histories.

And I've demonstrated that the creation of Adam is only allegorical with respect to the 2nd Adam, who is also the1st Adams' Creator,

For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him. 1Cor.15:27

 

[journeymanisnothing]

You think souls aren't alive? How so?

Adam wasn't until God

breathed into his nostrils the breath of life Gen.2:7

Every othe soul is born living because their parents procreate after mankind.

 

[Barbarian]

No my friend. I mean all of our Lords' allegories were told for the purpose of describimg himself and mankinds reaction toward him. They apply to past present and future because believers (who become live in every age being conformed to his image.
You're focused on when?, instead of why?

So still no answer? The old "appearance of age" idea that makes God out to be deceptive.

Only according to evolutionists

No, that's wrong, too. If God faked evidence for the Earth being old, then God is a god of deception. And since God is truth, your story can't be right.

 

[journeymanisnothing]

So still no answer? The old "appearance of age" idea that makes God out to be deceptive.

No, that's wrong, too. If God faked evidence for the Earth being old, then God is a god of deception. And since God is truth, your story can't be right.

What God made appears to have always existed, but it didn't.

 

[Barbarian]

What God made appears to have always existed, but it didn't.

God isn't deceptive, so that's not a possibility.

 

[journeymanisnothing]

God isn't deceptive, so that's not a possibility.

There's nothing deceptive in matter not existing, then existing in a way which can never be taken from existence.
If you believe what God made is as old as God himself, or that God can't blink from existence the physical universe as we know it, you're wrong.

And please my friend, no more plumbers. I know you're interpreting from sciences limitations.

 

[Barbarian]

There's nothing deceptive in matter not existing, then existing in a way which can never be taken from existence.

Yes, that's deceptive. God being truth, things like "apparent age" are not things God would do.

If you believe what God would engage in that kind of deception, you're wrong. Regarding the plumbers, just remember that science and plumbing can't consider God, but scientists and plumbers can.

 

[journeymanisnothing]

Yes, that's deceptive. God being truth, things like "apparent age" are not things God would do.

"Apparent age" from from the scientists point of view. God isn't responsible for their misinterpretaion of what he made.

If you believe what God would engage in that kind of deception, you're wrong.

God isn't the one engaging in deception.

Regarding the plumbers, just remember that science and plumbing can't consider God, but scientists and plumbers can.

It's all in how one looks at the evidence.

 

[Barbarian]

"Apparent age" from from the scientists point of view. God isn't responsible for their misinterpretaion of what he made.

"Apparent age" was coined by creationists. Would you like me to show you?

God isn't the one engaging in deception.

No, he isn't. What creationists call "apparent age" is real age.

 

[journeymanisnothing]

"Apparent age" was coined by creationists. Would you like me to show you?
No, he isn't. What creationists call "apparent age" is real age.

I only said apparent for your benefit. Of course I don't believe what's taught without question in schools.

People do the same thing with the gospel.