I meant that scientific study takes what is understood today in human terms (whether fact or not) and projects that understanding into the science using human logic and reasoning. Science attempts to explain or understand the world around us based on that same human logic and reasoning and is biased accordingly.
For example. I was listening to Carl Sagan explain the problems with us understanding four dimensions. We live in a physical 3-deminsional world, LxWxH all at right angles to each other, and that is what we understand. It is impossible for us to envision a 4-dimensional world with a 4th dimension at right angle to the other three.
Suppose one was to pass an apple through a physical 2-dimensional world. What would a 2-dimensional being see? In their world there is only length and width and no depth. So as the apple passes through the plane of their world, they would see an object appear out of nowhere, grow in both length and width, and then shrink until it disappeared again. Could they possibly describe what they saw as an apple? No, but they would try to describe it using their logic and reasoning based on their 2-dimensional worldly limitations.
This is how I view science with regard to explaining our world around us. God is not limited to our 3-dimensional world so all we can do is attempt to describe what we see and experience with our limited 3-dimensional vision. In other words, we are explaining godly things using human understanding.
I believe this is, in part, what Paul spoke of when he wrote...
11 When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child; but when I became a man, I put away childish things.
12 For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face.
1 Corinthians 13:11-12 NKJV
Compared to God, we are but children, thinking as children.