Paul's "Thorn in the Flesh"

  • CFN has a new look, using the Eagle as our theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • CFN welcomes a new contributing member!

    Please welcome Beetow to our Christian community.

    Blessings in Christ, and we pray you enjoy being a member here

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Interesting! I had never searched 'thorn in the flesh' in the OT. :)

One thing I think is clear, is that it was to keep him humble. Paul was clothed with such power, and much such a great ambassador of the kingdom, God by this protected him from falling under the condemnation of the devil.

I agree, Prentis. And Paul goes on to say how it kept him from becoming proud.

There's nothing that works better to keep us from becoming proud than to be ridiculed, reproached, persecuted, and accused of preaching heresy when you know you're speaking the truth. You can't get indignant or you're reacting in the flesh, so you rest in the Lord and trust His grace is sufficient.

2 Cor. 2:9-10 - "And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong."

Acts 20:19 - "Serving the LORD with all humility of mind, and with many tears, and temptations, which befell me by the lying in wait of the Jews:"
 
But in the OT these were people who the people of God embraced against God's will. The promise of God for doing that was to suffer under them. Doesn't apply to Paul's situation. Paul's persecutions have nothing to do with him sinfully associating with unbelievers.

IMO, outsider being allowed to inhabit the kingdom in the OT is symbolic of how we as a nation and people of God are not to allow sin to dwell in the kingdom and Temple of our bodies and congregations.

No, you're right, Paul wasn't sinfully associating with unbelievers, but Paul was the one who preached against the letter of the Law, and the pharisees didn't like him any more than they did Jesus. The verse in Numbers says, if you will not drive them out...those who remain will become thorns in your sides, and shall vex you.

Paul certainly spoke against those who were adulterating the gospel, and at the same time he was preaching the gospel to them. "Come out from among them, and be ye separate," doesn't mean we can leave the world. The people of the world are still a thorn in our sides, and we can't drive them out.

Here in Numbers 33:55, the children had just left Egypt and stopped all over the place. They hadn't done anything wrong yet. This was a warning of what would happen if any were left.

But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.
 
Every time this discussion comes up we have to remember that we simply don't know what Paul's thorn was. We just know that God allows suffering for the purposes of keeping us humble and dependent on him and not trusting in our own strengths, whether that be our knowledge, or wisdom, or physical strength. I personally lean toward the thorn being a physical limitation for all the reasons given here.

Paul certainly knew the law well, and we see that in lots of places in his letters. It's obvious the analogy of the thorn he uses comes right from the OT. In Hebrews he borrows the term 'bitter root' a reference from the OT about idolatry, to warn the church about letting trouble and defilement grow up in the church. And in Hebrews 13 he talks about the 'fruit of lips', an OT reference to a particular law of sacrifice. In 1 Corinthians he uses the law of not muzzling the ox to illustrate support for the ministry.

Reading and studying the OT will enhance the meaning of a lot of things in the NT. Sadly, the church has decided that anything OT is just that...OT, and they dismiss it as not useful and totally inapplicable. That's just not true.
 
Every time this discussion comes up we have to remember that we simply don't know what Paul's thorn was. We just know that God allows suffering for the purposes of keeping us humble and dependent on him and not trusting in our own strengths, whether that be our knowledge, or wisdom, or physical strength. I personally lean toward the thorn being a physical limitation for all the reasons given here.

Paul certainly knew the law well, and we see that in lots of places in his letters. It's obvious the analogy of the thorn he uses comes right from the OT. In Hebrews he borrows the term 'bitter root' a reference from the OT about idolatry, to warn the church about letting trouble and defilement grow up in the church. And in Hebrews 13 he talks about the 'fruit of lips', an OT reference to a particular law of sacrifice. In 1 Corinthians he uses the law of not muzzling the ox to illustrate support for the ministry.

Reading and studying the OT will enhance the meaning of a lot of things in the NT. Sadly, the church has decided that anything OT is just that...OT, and they dismiss it as not useful and totally inapplicable. That's just not true.

Very true, we can't know for sure about Paul's thorn in the flesh, but it gives good food for thought.

I love the OT, and couldn't agree more about it's ability to enhance the meaning of the New. Without knowing about the mercy seat, how can we understand about Christ's being our propitiation, for example. The Bible is really one big book, not the tail end of a big book.
 
I've heard a lot of speculation about the "messenger of satan" that buffeted Paul with a "thorn in the flesh."

Some say pride or some physical infirmity.


Paul was well-versed in Scripture. Where did he get this idea of thorns in the flesh?

These uses in the OT are speaking of worldly men.

Joshua 23:13 - "Know for a certainty that the LORD your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the LORD your God hath given you."

Ezekiel 2:6 - "And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house."

Judges 2:3 - "Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be as thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare unto you."

Numbers 33:55 - "But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell."

Anyone else see a correlation between Paul's thorn and these verses?

Absolutely. Paul's thorn in the flesh was 'obviously' a DEVIL that was put upon him.

In the above for example:

Ezekiel 2:6 - "And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house."

Brians, thorns and scorpions do NOT TALK or have WORDS. False prophets inhabited by A LYING SPIRIT is an example of children of the devil in those prophets. Jesus spoke to same as well.

Devils do speak, and they do so 'in man' as Jesus clearly showed on nearly every page of the N.T.

You see Paul's thorn in the flesh was CLEARLY a devil. Yet people who have their EYES BLINDED by same can NOT see it, though it is clearly stated. They say hmmmm? I WONDER what it was, even though Paul SAYS what it was, A DEVIL. That is an example of the brier in the eye of the reader BLINDING them to open statements.

They can read it all day every day for the balance of their life and never see the THORN is the DEVIL
.


2 Corinthians 12:7
And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

and most read it and say hmmmm? I WONDER what it was?

go figure....

s
 
You see Paul's thorn in the flesh was CLEARLY a devil. Yet people who have their EYES BLINDED by same can NOT see it, though it is clearly stated. They say hmmmm? I WONDER what it was, even though Paul SAYS what it was, A DEVIL. That is an example of the brier in the eye of the reader BLINDING them to open statements.

They can read it all day every day for the balance of their life and never see the THORN is the DEVIL
.


2 Corinthians 12:7
And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

and most read it and say hmmmm? I WONDER what it was?

go figure....

s
We know it was a messenger of satan, it plainly says that. What we don't know is how that messenger is manifesting his mission of suffering in Paul's flesh. Some say the torment brought by the messenger of satan manifested in a physical illness. Others say in the constant abuse of those who opposed him and his message. But we simply don't know for sure. For me, I am humbled in a different kind of buffeting which is neither a physical ailment nor persecution for speaking the truth. But it is still a buffeting of the enemy that keeps me from exalting myself in the measure of the knowledge of the Lord I have received...and which God has seen fit for me to endure through his grace rather than remove it.
 
We know it was a messenger of satan, it plainly says that. What we don't know is how that messenger is manifesting his mission of suffering in Paul's flesh.

Ah, so you do see the obvious, that THE THORN is THE DEVIL that was put upon Paul?
Some say the torment brought by the messenger of satan manifested in a physical illness. Others say in the constant abuse of those who opposed him and his message. But we simply don't know for sure. For me, I am humbled in a different kind of buffeting which is neither a physical ailment nor persecution for speaking the truth. But it is still a buffeting of the enemy that keeps me from exalting myself in the measure of the knowledge of the Lord I have received...and which God has seen fit for me to endure through his grace rather than remove it.
There are numerous citings in the scriptures of what devils do in and upon mankind.

We do know their primary workings 'in man' from what Jesus taught us:

John 10:10
The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy

Many subsections under those general categories.

s
 
There are numerous citings in the scriptures of what devils do in and upon mankind.

We do know their primary workings 'in man' from what Jesus taught us:

John 10:10
The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy

Many subsections under those general categories.

s
Correct.

So which of the three subsections did Paul's thorn fall under and what specific suffering did a demon inflict within that subsection?

We simply don't know.
 
Correct.

So which of the three subsections did Paul's thorn fall under and what specific suffering did a demon inflict within that subsection?

We simply don't know.

Actually Paul did disclose the problem. We know that the working of the devil is primarily to TEMPT, and that working of same is part of the lust impetus that is 'in the flesh' and caused by the devil, the tempter.

Paul admitted to this weakness, not only on Romans 7 where every form of concupiscience came into his mind, but also here:

Galatians 4:14
And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.

It's reasonable to assume it was mental temptation inserted by that worker of iniquity and therein, within, he fought the battles, just as we all do.

enjoy!

smaller
 
I'm just looking how thorn in the flesh is used in the rest of scripture. Thorns represent sin, and thorns in the flesh are the ungodly that come against the people of God. It's the same with the use of the word buffet. Failing eyesight doesn't really sound like buffeting to me.

The most telling, though, is the messenger from satan. This verse states the "wicked one" "touches" us not.
There is no other place in Scripture, that I could find, where "thorn in the flesh" is used, and "thorn" has many meanings, including simply "thorn."

As for a "messenger from Satan" and "buffeting," that could simply be a reference to his failing eyesight having been sent by Satan, much like Job's physical afflictions sent by Satan.

glorydaz said:
Paul could be referring to one group or even one particular person that is specifically targeting Paul for the message he brings through the continual beatings, once nearly to death. He prayed three times that he would be delivered from this thorn. Would Paul really pray three times because of a physical frailty, or would he accept it as a limitation allowed by God? God is in control of our physical well being...not some messenger from satan.

The most difficult part to imagine is Paul referring to failing eyesight as a thorn in his flesh when he goes through all this. And to pray three times about his eyesight? That just doesn't seem to fit the bill.
Why is it so difficult? "A thorn in the flesh" sounds like a physical infirmity. Wouldn't it be difficult for someone who spends much time speaking publicly, writing (or wanting to write) letters, meeting people, traveling, etc?

I actually find persecution the harder, and less likely, fit.

glorydaz said:
"My strength is made perfect in weakness," so Paul takes pleasure in his infirmities, reproaches...persecutions...

Certainly his persecutions and reproaches were harder to bear than failing eyesight. Seems to me.
Maybe, maybe not.

This all is really an exercise in futility anyway as there is far too much speculation and as such, I don't see the point.
 
I've heard a lot of speculation about the "messenger of satan" that buffeted Paul with a "thorn in the flesh."

Some say pride or some physical infirmity.


Paul was well-versed in Scripture. Where did he get this idea of thorns in the flesh?

These uses in the OT are speaking of worldly men.

Joshua 23:13 - "Know for a certainty that the LORD your God will no more drive out any of these nations from before you; but they shall be snares and traps unto you, and scourges in your sides, and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish from off this good land which the LORD your God hath given you."

Ezekiel 2:6 - "And thou, son of man, be not afraid of them, neither be afraid of their words, though briers and thorns be with thee, and thou dost dwell among scorpions: be not afraid of their words, nor be dismayed at their looks, though they be a rebellious house."

Judges 2:3 - "Wherefore I also said, I will not drive them out from before you; but they shall be as thorns in your sides, and their gods shall be a snare unto you."

Numbers 33:55 - "But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell."

Anyone else see a correlation between Paul's thorn and these verses?

Wow bro! By reading this post, before reading down, I saw where you was going with this. Me and my brother was just discussing this the other day, I have never looked at it that hard, but have been very interested. I've heard a thousand times that it was this or that, and it is fine, I like hearing them all. But this was the first time I have been wow-ed by the content and explanation. Thanks! Beautiful! Absolutely beautiful.

I think we should always search for the truth, not in contention, but in alliance. I have been reading the forum, and I like how the discussions further the truth (the perception of it, truth never changes). Thanks to all.

As for the answer you suggested then expounded upon, again, wow! This is why I am in agreement with you:

I went back a chapter, started reading. Paul suggest that he is jealous over the people there at Corinth and are afraid that as Eve was tricked by the devil, that these people would also be tricked away from the simplicity that is in Christ by false prophets, deceitful workers who tranform "themselves" into the apostles of Christ. Then Paul states that as Satan is transformed into an angel of light, his ministers are transformed into the ministers of righteousness. Then Paul states that as many glory in the flesh, he will also. And he goes on to glory in all kinds of troubling situations, mostly physical. And he says, that if he glories, he will glory in his infirmities. And the infirmities he listed were these attacks perpetrated by these ministers of Satan, which were people.

Then later he describes his thorn in the flesh, the messenger of satan, which sounds exactly like what he described earlier that came from the ministers of satan. Then Paul says that he asked the Lord 3 times about this. And the Lord said, "My grace is sufficient for thee: my strength is made perfect in weakness."

Then (here's the sinker) Paul reiterates in the next verse- Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.

Paul definitely seems to confirm that these infirmities, which are the thorn in his flesh, in chapter 12 are the same infirmities that he listed in chapter 11 of this book.

Again, I say, beautiful. Jesus did say that if the world hated the master then they would hate the servants. This simple message of good news makes the messengers and workers of Satan angry and offensive.

How better to stay humble after learning the good news than to have to suffer persecution because of your belief of the good news at the hands of the ministers and messengers of satan?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually Paul did disclose the problem. We know that the working of the devil is primarily to TEMPT, and that working of same is part of the lust impetus that is 'in the flesh' and caused by the devil, the tempter.

Paul admitted to this weakness, not only on Romans 7 where every form of concupiscience came into his mind, but also here:

Galatians 4:14
And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.

It's reasonable to assume it was mental temptation inserted by that worker of iniquity and therein, within, he fought the battles, just as we all do.

enjoy!

smaller
God bless you friend, but this still doesn't tell us what outward thing Paul's temptation is rising up in response to. When I am tempted to sin, there is an identifiable person or circumstance that provokes that temptation. Sometimes it's my own body causing me to be irritable or impatient or covetous. Sometimes it's what someone is doing to me. Sometimes it's the frustration of situations and circumstances that don't allow me to accomplish what I want to do. I know it's my flesh reacting, with the powers of darkness close by to increase the torment, but my temptations play off something very specific going on in my life--persecution, abuse, physical illness, etc. We simply don't know for sure what that 'thing' was in Paul's life, stirred up by an agent of satan, that God decided he must endure through His grace.
 
How better to stay humble after learning the good news than to have to suffer persecution because of your belief of the good news at the hands of the ministers and messengers of satan?
Or, how better to stay humble in the gift God has given you than to endure the failure of a marriage? See, there can be more than one source of failure and struggle that seems to pull the rug of authenticity out from under someone's ministry, keeping them humble and not haughty in the revelation and power of God they have received. God knows which struggle will humble which person. Mine are probably different than yours.

By the way, I've always understood 'infirmity' to mean physical illness of some sort. I couldn't say that's an absolute fact, or not. But that's how I've heard it explained a number of times--sin itself being the ultimate sickness of the flesh.
 
"Thorn in the Flesh"

Or, how better to stay humble in the gift God has given you than to endure the failure of a marriage? See, there can be more than one source of failure and struggle that seems to pull the rug of authenticity out from under someone's ministry, keeping them humble and not haughty in the revelation and power of God they have received. God knows which struggle will humble which person. Mine are probably different than yours.

Jethro, I agree with you that our failures and struggles are different and humble us. I do believe that this thorn in the flesh was something different. Something that Paul could glory in, at the time it was happening. A divorce, maybe, but sometimes it is our sin that is the source of our struggle, and we don't usually glory in our sin when we commit it, only after we have been chastised does that type of struggling yield the peaceable fruits of righteousness. I can only glory in spitting in that tubby guy's face when I was a child only after I had been chastised for it by my heavenly father, and it has yielded the peaceable fruits of righteousness for some 30 years afterward. I do glory in that, but only after I had learned a great lesson from it.

Paul's thorn in the flesh that he is speaking of in chapter 12 of 2 Corinthians is something that he could glory in in the midst of the tribulation. And you can only glory in that kind of infirmity when you are suffering for someone else's sin, such as those from the "ministers of satan" which are real people, our own failings most people are ashamed of, not glory in.

By the way, I've always understood 'infirmity' to mean physical illness of some sort. I couldn't say that's an absolute fact, or not. But that's how I've heard it explained a number of times--sin itself being the ultimate sickness of the flesh.

I am sure that many times when the word infirmity is used it is probably refering to some physical sickness. But, in this passage, starting in chapter 11, starting at say verse 12 and going down Paul refers to these physical torments brought on by the ministers of satan as "infirmities" in verse 30. Then in chapter 12 right below where Paul said that he was given a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of satan, to buffet him, he refered to that as his infirmity, confirming, I believe, that this messenger of satan in Chapter 12 was the same ministers of satan referred to in chapter 11 that were buffeting him.

I dunno, read chapter 11 and see if that is what Paul was refering to as his infirmities, and get back to me, I'd be interested to see if you see it that way.
 
God bless you friend, but this still doesn't tell us what outward thing Paul's temptation is rising up in response to.

I view temptation as an internal matter, that is, in the mind. All temptation and evil originates within and from the tempter. Paul clearly had a tempter, a messenger of the devil put in his flesh and I don't believe that excluded his mind.
When I am tempted to sin, there is an identifiable person or circumstance that provokes that temptation. Sometimes it's my own body causing me to be irritable or impatient or covetous. Sometimes it's what someone is doing to me. Sometimes it's the frustration of situations and circumstances that don't allow me to accomplish what I want to do. I know it's my flesh reacting, with the powers of darkness close by to increase the torment, but my temptations play off something very specific going on in my life--persecution, abuse, physical illness, etc. We simply don't know for sure what that 'thing' was in Paul's life, stirred up by an agent of satan, that God decided he must endure through His grace.

I appreciate Paul not being specific about the exact workings of darkness other than to say it was with him and that by the Spirit, he overcame same.

Matthew 15:19

For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:

Mark 7:21

For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,

All sin is a progression of temptation from with, from thought to word and eventually to deed, pumped into the mind by THE TEMPTER.

s
 
Re: "Thorn in the Flesh"

Jethro, I agree with you that our failures and struggles are different and humble us. I do believe that this thorn in the flesh was something different. Something that Paul could glory in, at the time it was happening. A divorce, maybe, but sometimes it is our sin that is the source of our struggle, and we don't usually glory in our sin when we commit it, only after we have been chastised does that type of struggling yield the peaceable fruits of righteousness. I can only glory in spitting in that tubby guy's face when I was a child only after I had been chastised for it by my heavenly father, and it has yielded the peaceable fruits of righteousness for some 30 years afterward. I do glory in that, but only after I had learned a great lesson from it.

Paul's thorn in the flesh that he is speaking of in chapter 12 of 2 Corinthians is something that he could glory in in the midst of the tribulation. And you can only glory in that kind of infirmity when you are suffering for someone else's sin, such as those from the "ministers of satan" which are real people, our own failings most people are ashamed of, not glory in.



I am sure that many times when the word infirmity is used it is probably refering to some physical sickness. But, in this passage, starting in chapter 11, starting at say verse 12 and going down Paul refers to these physical torments brought on by the ministers of satan as "infirmities" in verse 30. Then in chapter 12 right below where Paul said that he was given a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of satan, to buffet him, he refered to that as his infirmity, confirming, I believe, that this messenger of satan in Chapter 12 was the same ministers of satan referred to in chapter 11 that were buffeting him.

I dunno, read chapter 11 and see if that is what Paul was refering to as his infirmities, and get back to me, I'd be interested to see if you see it that way.
This doesn't make any sense. You're saying the things he takes pride in is what God allows to continue to keep him humble.

It makes much more sense that all the things he says can take pride in and boast about in chapter 11...

"I have worked much harder, been in prison more frequently, been flogged more severely, and been exposed to death again and again. 24 Five times I received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. 25 Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea, 26 I have been constantly on the move. I have been in danger from rivers, in danger from bandits, in danger from my own countrymen, in danger from Gentiles; in danger in the city, in danger in the country, in danger at sea; and in danger from false brothers. 27 I have labored and toiled and have often gone without sleep; I have known hunger and thirst and have often gone without food; I have been cold and naked." (2 Cor. 11:23-27 NIV1984)

...are actually the things, along with his privileged revelations, that the "thorn in (his) flesh, a messenger of Satan" (2 Cor. 12:7 NIV1984) is allowed to keep doing to keep him from becoming conceited about and taking pride in. Understand?

As I said before, persecutions tend to be more of a source of pride than they are a humbling. Paul shows us that very clearly in chapter 11. And to keep Paul from being conceited in his outstanding exploits for the sake of the kingdom and the incredible revelations he has received from God he says God allows a messenger of satan to torment him in his flesh. Makes perfect sense.

This is why it's hard to see the sufferings for the kingdom themselves as the messenger of satan that keeps him humble. Paul says his sufferings for the kingdom are a source of boasting for him, not a source of humility. Thus the need for some other kind of suffering to keep him from boasting in that which he can. A physical illness or limitation, or personal struggle would do that...not a continuation of that which he can take pride in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: "Thorn in the Flesh"

This doesn't make any sense. You're saying the things he takes pride in is what God allows to continue to keep him humble.

Yes, Paul list 2 different catagories of things, his infirmities (which he refered to in chapter 11 as all these distress), and his revelations and visions (which he received from the Lord). And this is what he says... " If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine infirmities."

He could glory in the things that build him up and make him seem like such a holy man of God, but rather, he glories in the things that make him weak.

It makes much more sense that all the things he says can take pride in and boast about in chapter 11...

"I have worked much harder, been in prison more frequently, been flogged more severely, and been exposed to death again and again. 24 Five times I received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one. 25 Three times I was beaten with rods, once I was stoned, three times I was shipwrecked, I spent a night and a day in the open sea, 26 I have been constantly on the move. I have been in danger from rivers, in danger from bandits, in danger from my own countrymen, in danger from Gentiles; in danger in the city, in danger in the country, in danger at sea; and in danger from false brothers. 27 I have labored and toiled and have often gone without sleep; I have known hunger and thirst and have often gone without food; I have been cold and naked." (2 Cor. 11:23-27 NIV1984)

...are actually the things, along with his privileged revelations, that the "thorn in (his) flesh, a messenger of Satan" (2 Cor. 12:7 NIV1984) is allowed to keep doing to keep him from becoming conceited about and taking pride in. Understand?

Yes, I understand. But I think you confuse and combine the infirmities and the revelations and visions. Paul said that if he is going to glory in something, it is not going to be his revelations and visions from the Lord, but the things that are humiliating, like public floggings, hungering and thirsting, being naked, ect.

As I said before, persecutions tend to be more of a source of pride than they are a humbling. Paul shows us that very clearly in chapter 11. And to keep Paul from being conceited in his outstanding exploits for the sake of the kingdom and the incredible revelations he has received from God he says God allows a messenger of satan to torment him in his flesh. Makes perfect sense.

If you think persecutions are a source of pride I may gentle suggest you have never been persecuted, as Paul clearly states that his infirmities (which the Lord refered to as weakness) is humbling, not something to be proud of. People calling you a liar, ridiculing, beating, ect is a very humbling experience.

This is why it's hard to see the sufferings for the kingdom themselves as the messenger of satan that keeps him humble. Paul says his sufferings for the kingdom are a source of boasting for him, not a source of humility. Thus the need for some other kind of suffering to keep him from boasting in that which he can. A physical illness or limitation, or personal struggle would do that...not a continuation of that which he can take pride in.

Again, Paul did not want to boast, he says he has become a fool in boasting just for doing it, but if he is going to boast, he will boast about his weaknesses, infirmities, distresses, reproaches, and necessities (12: 9-11), and not his revelations and visions. He says if he must boast, then it will be in the things that keep him humble.

One thing further, that I believe proves that Paul's thorn in the flesh was all these fleshly things he was suffering. Paul states that lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh....

Paul didn't say that lest he should be exalted above measure through the abundance of suffering for Christ.

Then Paul says he besought the Lord 3 times that this thorn in the flesh should be taken away. And the Lord said, my grace is suffecient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Then Paul says, Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities. Then in the next verse he goes on to explain what all those infirmities include, this is what he says: Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.

See, the Lord told him that this thorn in the flesh is what makes him weak, so that the Lord's strength could be revealed. And Paul says that all these infirmities and reproaches and necessities and persecutions and distresses for Christ's sake makes him weak, but ironically, that is when he is strong.

Some may say it doesn't make sense, but it makes perfect sense.
 
Re: "Thorn in the Flesh"

Paul's thorn in the flesh that he is speaking of in chapter 12 of 2 Corinthians is something that he could glory in in the midst of the tribulation. And you can only glory in that kind of infirmity when you are suffering for someone else's sin, such as those from the "ministers of satan" which are real people, our own failings most people are ashamed of, not glory in.

I am sure that many times when the word infirmity is used it is probably refering to some physical sickness. But, in this passage, starting in chapter 11, starting at say verse 12 and going down Paul refers to these physical torments brought on by the ministers of satan as "infirmities" in verse 30. Then in chapter 12 right below where Paul said that he was given a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of satan, to buffet him, he refered to that as his infirmity, confirming, I believe, that this messenger of satan in Chapter 12 was the same ministers of satan referred to in chapter 11 that were buffeting him.

I agree it helps our understanding of this issue to read carefully what Paul is saying in Chapter 11. He asks that they bear with him as he explains. Just as satan "seduced" Eve with his subtilty, the believers in Corinth were being led away from the true Gospel Paul had preached.
2 Cor. 11:2 said:
For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.

I believe Paul is speaking here of the Judaizers who were adulterating the gospel of grace by preaching a gospel of works, putting the "chaste virgin" back into bondage, and they were charging for their preaching while exalting themselves...20For ye suffer, if a man bring you into bondage, if a man devour you, if a man take of you, if a man exalt himself, if a man smite you on the face.

2 Cor.11:13-15 said:
For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

Paul's fear for the church was that they would be entangled again with the yoke of bondage through these false prophets, these ministers of satan who sought to take away the liberty that was in Christ. Galatians 5:1 "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage."

Could this possibly one of the three instances when Paul sought to be delivered from this thorn in the flesh?
Acts 13:6-12 said:
And when they had gone through the isle unto Paphos, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Barjesus: Which was with the deputy of the country, Sergius Paulus, a prudent man; who called for Barnabas and Saul, and desired to hear the word of God. But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. Then Saul, (who also is called Paul,) filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him. And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? And now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a season. And immediately there fell on him a mist and a darkness; and he went about seeking some to lead him by the hand. Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, believed, being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord.
 
Re: "Thorn in the Flesh"

Again, Paul did not want to boast, he says he has become a fool in boasting just for doing it, but if he is going to boast, he will boast about his weaknesses, infirmities, distresses, reproaches, and necessities (12: 9-11), and not his revelations and visions. He says if he must boast, then it will be in the things that keep him humble.

One thing further, that I believe proves that Paul's thorn in the flesh was all these fleshly things he was suffering. Paul states that lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh....

Paul didn't say that lest he should be exalted above measure through the abundance of suffering for Christ.


Then Paul says he besought the Lord 3 times that this thorn in the flesh should be taken away. And the Lord said, my grace is suffecient for thee, for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Then Paul says, Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities. Then in the next verse he goes on to explain what all those infirmities include, this is what he says: Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong.

See, the Lord told him that this thorn in the flesh is what makes him weak, so that the Lord's strength could be revealed. And Paul says that all these infirmities and reproaches and necessities and persecutions and distresses for Christ's sake makes him weak, but ironically, that is when he is strong.

Some may say it doesn't make sense, but it makes perfect sense.

Excellent insight. :thumbsup

Then the messenger from satan would be those who caused those infirmities, reproaches, etc.
Those ministers of satan Paul spoke of in Chapter 11...those who subvert the gospel of grace. They hated the gospel of grace and the righteousness of Christ which Paul taught.
 
Re: "Thorn in the Flesh"

Excellent insight. :thumbsup

Then the messenger from satan would be those who caused those infirmities, reproaches, etc.
Those ministers of satan Paul spoke of in Chapter 11...those who subvert the gospel of grace. They hated the gospel of grace and the righteousness of Christ which Paul taught.

ah, two minor observations.

People are not messengers (angles of Satan) devils are and people are not devils. Devils are clearly shown in the scriptures to be an entirely 'different entity' than the people they were upon/in. So no, the 'messenger of Satan' was not other people.

That messenger of Satan was IN his flesh. Other people are NOT in someone else's flesh. Everyone has their own flesh.

2 Corinthians 12:7
And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.

Were it 'other people' Paul could have simply walked away from them.

Paul also referred to temptation "IN" his flesh. We know that Satan (inclusive of devils) work the workings of temptation.

Galatians 4:14
And my temptation which was in my flesh-

In short, Paul had a devil/demon put IN him by God. The result of which was temptation and perhaps also 'undefined' infirmities.

s