Thanks for response, mjjcb, and for your advice to make my post a little less vague. Yes, I'm American.
Yes, I was intentionally vague about the specifics, because I'm thinking through the idea of ethics in general more than I am facing a certain situation. I am likely about to go into a media profession, and am puzzling through the hows and whys of christian ethics. We all choose our principles and out moral standings one way or the other, and as christians, presumably based upon the teachings of Jesus. But there is often no direct correlation between His teachings and the actual facts of our ethical dilemmas. I have spoken to several people in the past few years who have really had to weigh their ethics in one side and the potential for personal loss or gain in the other. And I know of many instances where the person has chosen to change their perspective- to change the way they approached it entirely. It is because of these things that I am sort of pre-thinking the idea of that probability. Some things are easy to call, but other things fall into that vast, sort of gray area that can really only be defined by the way we perceive it.
I guess what I'm looking for is the essence of that struggle. When must we stand on our preconceived morals, and when must we decide that they are not the best way to believe? What kinds of thoughts are important ones in considering such an ethical dilemma?