Christian Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
-
Guest, Join Papa Zoom today for some uplifting biblical encouragement! --> Daily Verses
Barbarian
Member
What was most persuasive for me was the fact that the one structure that is absolutely essential to cellular life (the cell membrane) happens to be the simplest major component of the cell.
It's been greatly modified by additions, but the basic membrane is amazingly simple (and self-assembling into spherical containers)
It's been greatly modified by additions, but the basic membrane is amazingly simple (and self-assembling into spherical containers)
F
felix
Guest
It is said that the simplest major component of a cell is more complex than a spacecraft and it is impossible to come random. This is why Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA structure went on to propose panspermia theory. The theory suggests, someone from outer space planted the seed for life because he couldn't accept that God created.
jasoncran
Member
havent we tried to make life? i know theres the synthetic life experiment but that was from ecoli mixed with other bacterias dnas(which were copied , not created from scratch) thus we looked at existing dna and copied it by manipulation of materials.
we havent simply from no template, made a template for life that would and could live and be so unique.
we havent simply from no template, made a template for life that would and could live and be so unique.
Barbarian
Member
It might have been said by someone profoundly ignorant of biology. The cell membrane is a very simple structure:
These bilayers spontaneously form vesicles, which hold the contents of the cell. The "random" part is also evidence of ignorance. Cells could not have evolved randomly. But then natural selection isn't random.
Perhaps. God says the Earth brought forth life. Science is just now understanding how that might have happened. But the fact that the one indispensible part of cellular life is the simplest structure in the cell does make it seem more likely.
F
felix
Guest
It might have been said by someone profoundly ignorant of biology. The cell membrane is a very simple structure:
These bilayers spontaneously form vesicles, which hold the contents of the cell. The "random" part is also evidence of ignorance. Cells could not have evolved randomly. But then natural selection isn't random.
Perhaps. God says the Earth brought forth life. Science is just now understanding how that might have happened. But the fact that the one indispensible part of cellular life is the simplest structure in the cell does make it seem more likely.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dMlde9akBk
Last edited by a moderator:
jasoncran
Member
for something had no intellegence to make life, we dumb humans cant seem to do it.
it would be interesting if we got contacted by a silicone artificial intellegence life as most evos deny that happening.
yet, they claim that chemical evolution is occuring.
so why not silicone chips.
it would be interesting if we got contacted by a silicone artificial intellegence life as most evos deny that happening.
yet, they claim that chemical evolution is occuring.
so why not silicone chips.
FYI: Silicon, not Silicone. Silicon is an element used in electronics (and some propose could make life because it can form long chains). Silicone is a polymer (a "plastic" of sorts, polydimethylsioxane, made from silicon plus other materials) and has nothing to do with computer chips.
Subtle, but crucial. Like the difference between Nitric and Nitrous acids. One burns your lungs, the other is laughing gas. NO2 versus N2O. Subtle, but crucial.
Can you provide a synopsis, for those without large bandwidth capabilities, please?
Or, really, just as courtesy so that people don't have to click on unknown links to get the main gist.
Give us a couple of thousand years, we will probably figure it out.
jasoncran
Member
lord help us when we do.
you athiests seem to be big on science yet tout the wonders of nasa. surely you are aware that we only went to space because of the threat of russian dominating it. the cape launches more and more military missions then any science one. i would say when the shuttl was going strong at min 4 to one ratio.
so science isnt a big thing to the govt save when it produces weapons. that is why i say that about life.
for kicks on that. google this:
the neosapian/exosquad. its based on your premise.
Agree completely that military efforts are what made NASA viable. Although one should remember that most military efforts are science-based, in order to work. Satellites are science, even though satellites were made for military purposes foremost.
I do love my Hubble.
Many of our scientific inventions were based on military efforts, e.g. the internet.
I do love my Hubble.
Many of our scientific inventions were based on military efforts, e.g. the internet.
jasoncran
Member
yes they are but that is why is say heaven help us
the fictional neosapien is able to live in hostile enviroments, doesnt need sleep and doesnt need to mate though there are females. has superior intellegence.
great soldier, no family to worry about, great miners and also slaves. thus began the thus neosapien war...
my bad that is why i dont like the idea of humans making life. we love war and greed to much.