![]()
Revelation 1:1-3
God gave these revelations to Jesus first and then he passed it onto John through a ministering angel through visions as God reveals those...
Continue reading...
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
![]()
Revelation 1:1-3
God gave these revelations to Jesus first and then he passed it onto John through a ministering angel through visions as God reveals those...
I know what you mean. A lot of times in studies of Revelation it's like this is what makes sense to me, and this is what makes sense to you, which one is true? Let's wait and see.I wrote this as a study as I went chapter by chapter in how I understand what each one teaches us. I do not expect everyone to agree with my understanding, but to study all the scriptures and history I have given and come up with their own conclusions.
There are a lot of bandwagon false teachings out there on end times and if what they teach does not line up with scripture then never believe what they try to teach. Revelation is my greatest passion and have been studying it for 40 years now and always learn something new as the Holy Spirit is the only one that can reveal truth.
There are a lot of bandwagon false teachings out there on end times and if what they teach does not line up with scripture then never believe what they try to teach. Revelation is my greatest passion and have been studying it for 40 years now and always learn something new as the Holy Spirit is the only one that can reveal truth.
Have you ever consider that all that God has created operates under "His Natural Laws" Is He not the creator of Apocalyptic Prophecy (Dan., Rev.) their true meaning is only possible by understanding these hermeneutic and applying them correctly of course. The beauty of applying proven hermeneutics is that personal bias is eliminated.I know what you mean. A lot of times in studies of Revelation it's like this is what makes sense to me, and this is what makes sense to you, which one is true? Let's wait and see.
Not only Gods natural laws, but also His Spiritual laws that are set in motion and His timing when all the prophecies will be fulfilled. History always repeats itself as we see within the four Empires beginning with Babylon up to the timing when the Roman Empire's deadly wound was healed and leads up to a New World Order. There is no place for personal bias, but only that which has already been written by the Prophets of old in what they foretold about the latter days that even now we are living in them.Have you ever consider that all that God has created operates under "His Natural Laws" Is He not the creator of Apocalyptic Prophecy (Dan., Rev.) their true meaning is only possible by understanding these hermeneutic and applying them correctly of course. The beauty of applying proven hermeneutics is that personal bias is eliminated.
If everyone understood them like we do the laws that govern math and other sciences we all would be on the same pg. regardless of race, culture, and religion. Make sense?
Glory, appreciate your response, and understand you believe that God uses "His Natural Laws" to govern is creation. Not sure you agree that would include His prophecies found in Dan., and Rev., as I do. I believe if more christians understood what they were, and applied them correctly personal bias would be eliminated and private interpretations (interpretations based on invalid/proven hermeneutics) could easily be discerned.There is no place for personal bias,
Your signature says "My major interest is studying Revelations". The capital R suggests you are referring to the Book of Revelation (singular), but you may be saying your major interest is studying revelations (plural) in the whole Bible, and in the experience of humankind. Clarity would be appreciated.
My interest is studying the book of Revelation, but it takes the full of the Bible and history to understand it.Your signature says "My major interest is studying Revelations". The capital R suggests you are referring to the Book of Revelation (singular), but you may be saying your major interest is studying revelations (plural) in the whole Bible, and in the experience of humankind. Clarity would be appreciated.
I take no offense. The only method I use in my studies over the last 40 years are scripture as I cross reference the OT as you will notice that I use a lot of scripture from the prophecies of the OT Prophets and also studying the history of the four empires beginning with the Babylonian up to present day Roman Empire (not the Catholic Church) as only the Holy Spirit can reveal these mysteries to me. There are good websites and bad websites when it comes to end times and when using any of them one needs to Spiritually discern that which is written and if those writings do not line up with scripture then stay clear of them. I never ask anyone to agree with me, but to take the scriptures I give and study them for themselves so we can have unity in our discussions. There are no rights or wrongs, but how each of us understand that which has already been written.Glory, appreciate your response, and understand you believe that God uses "His Natural Laws" to govern is creation. Not sure you agree that would include His prophecies found in Dan., and Rev., as I do. I believe if more christians understood what they were, and applied them correctly personal bias would be eliminated and private interpretations (interpretations based on invalid/proven hermeneutics) could easily be discerned.
I have finally found my way into your studies on Rev., and at this time have read through Rev.6. and Jumped ahead to Rev.13. Familiar with much of the interpretation, and since the identity of many of the symbols go back centuries I'm assuming your just passing along what you have learned from previous writers. I have no problem with this.
My question to you is this, do you understand the laws of interpretation/hermeneutics early expositors used to arrive at the interpretations you share? I started reading your Rev.1 study, looking to see if you would make know to your readers the hermeneutics that form the foundation of your Rev., study. I found nothing. I know you most likely will get defensive here, but I think there is a strong possibility you my not even know yourself or understand the importance of valid hermeneutics because you have never been informed. The fact is invalid hermeneutics only produce invalid/private interpretations. I'm sure you don't want to be a part of that.
Should you understand the hermeneutics of the interpretation of Rev., study please share with me and your readers so we can verify that the interpretation is on the mark. In turn I will share what I believe are the laws of interpretation God used when He have us Dan., and Rev., prophecies.
I challenge you to read the book I wrote on Revelation that you can find in the subforum in End Times forum titled Revelation as you will see it is all visions John received from the angel Jesus sent to him starting with the warnings to the seven churches in Asia up to the time of Christ return on the last day.The Book of Revelation cannot be understood apart from viewing it in its proper historical setting. The setting is given to us in the first and last chapter. John was shown those things which were to SHORTLY take place; the time was NEAR (Rev. 1:1, 3; 22:6, 10). In other words, John's vision involved those events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70. I challenge anyone, if just for curiosity's sake, to approach the book that way and find out whether things finally make sense!
You are still missing the CLEAR timing that John was given. He was "shown those things which were to SHORTLY take place; the time was NEAR" (Rev. 1:1,3; 22:6,10). The entire Book of Revelation deals with the events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70.I challenge you to read the book I wrote on Revelation that you can find in the subforum in End Times forum titled Revelation as you will see it is all visions John received from the angel Jesus sent to him starting with the warnings to the seven churches in Asia up to the time of Christ return on the last day.
Revelation is compiled of all the prophecies of the OT, plus history of the four Empires that leads up to the timing of the seven trumpets, son of perdition taking his seat in Jerusalem, the seven vial judgements, Christ return on the last day and God's final judgement before the New Jerusalem can be ushered down.
Jesus Foretells Destruction of the TempleYou are still missing the CLEAR timing that John was given. He was "shown those things which were to SHORTLY take place; the time was NEAR" (Rev. 1:1,3; 22:6,10). The entire Book of Revelation deals with the events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70.
Did you see the only post I have posted on here? I can appreciate the epically horrid grammar causing misunderstanding, but I do believe the meaning is accurate. I personally believe when Genesis and Leviticus are telling us of weeks of years, that we should probably be paying attention. Nor should it be lost on anyone that after the seven sabbatical years in Leviticus, the trumpet was to be blown and in revelation after the seven seals, seven angels are given seven trumpets.Have you ever consider that all that God has created operates under "His Natural Laws" Is He not the creator of Apocalyptic Prophecy (Dan., Rev.) their true meaning is only possible by understanding these hermeneutic and applying them correctly of course. The beauty of applying proven hermeneutics is that personal bias is eliminated.
If everyone understood them like we do the laws that govern math and other sciences we all would be on the same pg. regardless of race, culture, and religion. Make sense?
Do the math. John was around 30 years old when the Roman siege destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple in 70AD. When John was around 95 he was exiled as a convict to the isle of Patmos by the Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Domitianus for preaching the word of God in Asia Minor. He wrote the book of Revelation while he was a prisoner there.You are still missing the CLEAR timing that John was given. He was "shown those things which were to SHORTLY take place; the time was NEAR" (Rev. 1:1,3; 22:6,10). The entire Book of Revelation deals with the events leading up to and including the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70.