Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Seeker Friendly

handy

Member
OK, I alluded to this on a different thread and decided I really couldn't derail that one, so I started a new one.

The subject is "seeker friendly" churches, and I'll start with the quote from "seeker friendly" pastor extraordinaire, Rick Warren:

“More people are won to Christ by feeling God’s presence than by all of our apologetic arguments combined. … It is the sense of God’s presence that melts hearts and explodes mental barriersâ€
The Purpose Driven Church (“Worship Can Be a Witnessâ€)p.241

I question that. I question whether this is even Biblical. Does the Bible teach us that the saved are saved by feeling God's presence? Generally, in the Bible, the unsaved's reaction to feeling God's presence is one of abject terror and fear, or such a complete cluelessness about what they are seeing that they write it off as drunkenness, as in the case of Pentecost. I always thought that the saved were saved by faith, faith in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross because our sin and that we find forgiveness of our sin in Him. When Peter preached to the unsaved that were mocking those at Pentecost, it wasn't exactly a "feel good" "uplifting" message. He basically told them they had nailed to the cross an innocent man, "God has made Him both Lord and Christ - this Jesus whom you crucified."
I don't see, and perhaps I need someone to point them out, Scriptures that tell us that those who are saved are saved because they had a warm uplifting experience in which they "felt" God's presence.

I grew up being taught, and finding it verified in God's Word, that the purpose of the church is the equipping of the saints to go out into the world and share the gospel, complete with the message of our fallen and sinful nature and just what exactly we are being saved from (gasp, hell). It seems with the onset of seeker friendly churches, that the idea is now that the saints are just to bring the unsaved to worship services that are uplifting and emotionally charged, and most importantly of all: comfortingly familiar (with the latest in current trends in music and plenty of coffee, snacks, fun things for the kids to do, basketball teams that one can sign up for, etc.). "Negative" messages, such as our sinful natures, hell, the fact that we are responsible for the Cross, are diminished if not ignored altogether.

If I could see, within the past 25 years or so, that the Church was making a huge impact for the cause of Christ throughout the world, I would figure, hey, God's moving so who am I to question it. But, I don't see it. What I do see, is the Church is getting more and more fleshy, with issues like divorce, fornication, homosexuality, and a host of other sins, being more and more embraced by the church as being the way things are and don't worry because God loves you, yes He does.

I mean, my best friend had to leave their "seeker friendly" church after 30 years of membership there, because they needed to get their daughter out of the youth group, because the youth group kids were all involved in drugs, being tattooed, cutting and sending nude pictures of themselves to each other.

My opinion about these seeker friendly churches is that they are Mrs. Dash, a salt-substitute. It tastes good, but it's by no means the essential nutrient we need to live.
 
handy said:
OK, I alluded to this on a different thread and decided I really couldn't derail that one, so I started a new one.

The subject is "seeker friendly" churches, and I'll start with the quote from "seeker friendly" pastor extraordinaire, Rick Warren:

“More people are won to Christ by feeling God’s presence than by all of our apologetic arguments combined. … It is the sense of God’s presence that melts hearts and explodes mental barriersâ€
The Purpose Driven Church (“Worship Can Be a Witnessâ€)p.241

I question that. I question whether this is even Biblical. Does the Bible teach us that the saved are saved by feeling God's presence? Generally, in the Bible, the unsaved's reaction to feeling God's presence is one of abject terror and fear, or such a complete cluelessness about what they are seeing that they write it off as drunkenness, as in the case of Pentecost. I always thought that the saved were saved by faith, faith in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross because our sin and that we find forgiveness of our sin in Him. When Peter preached to the unsaved that were mocking those at Pentecost, it wasn't exactly a "feel good" "uplifting" message. He basically told them they had nailed to the cross an innocent man, "God has made Him both Lord and Christ - this Jesus whom you crucified."
I don't see, and perhaps I need someone to point them out, Scriptures that tell us that those who are saved are saved because they had a warm uplifting experience in which they "felt" God's presence.

I grew up being taught, and finding it verified in God's Word, that the purpose of the church is the equipping of the saints to go out into the world and share the gospel, complete with the message of our fallen and sinful nature and just what exactly we are being saved from (gasp, hell). It seems with the onset of seeker friendly churches, that the idea is now that the saints are just to bring the unsaved to worship services that are uplifting and emotionally charged, and most importantly of all: comfortingly familiar (with the latest in current trends in music and plenty of coffee, snacks, fun things for the kids to do, basketball teams that one can sign up for, etc.). "Negative" messages, such as our sinful natures, hell, the fact that we are responsible for the Cross, are diminished if not ignored altogether.

If I could see, within the past 25 years or so, that the Church was making a huge impact for the cause of Christ throughout the world, I would figure, hey, God's moving so who am I to question it. But, I don't see it. What I do see, is the Church is getting more and more fleshy, with issues like divorce, fornication, homosexuality, and a host of other sins, being more and more embraced by the church as being the way things are and don't worry because God loves you, yes He does.

I mean, my best friend had to leave their "seeker friendly" church after 30 years of membership there, because they needed to get their daughter out of the youth group, because the youth group kids were all involved in drugs, being tattooed, cutting and sending nude pictures of themselves to each other.

My opinion about these seeker friendly churches is that they are Mrs. Dash, a salt-substitute. It tastes good, but it's by no means the essential nutrient we need to live.



Some people feel more comfortable in and respond to fire and brimstone churches that focus on the anger and power of God. Repent or burn in eternal hellfire. These churches focus on judgment of sin. I personally think they focus too much on works. Don't do this, live like this, etc. Homosexual, or whatever will go to hell. As if what you do, good or bad. I mean if you can't earn your way into Heaven though works how can you send yourself to hell through works.

Some people feel more comfortable in a positive nurturing environment where the focus is on the love and forgiveness of Jesus Christ. I like these better, but they have their own problems.

People are different all over the world. You like fire and brimstone judgmental church. I like the love and forgiveness of Jesus church. I like leaving church inspired, not afraid and depressed.
 
Sorry, I guess in all my bloviating, I didn't stress my point for the thread enough.

The point of the thread isn't what kind of "flavor" of church one likes.

The point of the thread is more to search the scriptures and see what the role of the church is? As saint, is the purpose of the church to bring the unsaved to feel good worship services? Or, is the purpose of the church to equip the saints to go out and be salt and light to the world.

I know, I know, that sounds like a hopelessly loaded question. I realize just in asking it, it sounds as if I want everyone to say "why the Bible says we are to be salt and light".

So maybe the better question is, are the seeker friendly churches, the ones who look so much like a popular club that meets on Sunday mornings rather than Friday nights and don't serve alcohol, being salt and light to the world?

Also, just how are we saved anyway? Is it really by "feeling" something? Given how manipulative good music is, how are we sure what one is feeling after listening to the upteenth chorus of "You Are My God", is actually God or just the result of feel good music. Not to be profane, and I really hope folks can understand what I'm getting at here, but can a crowd get the same electric feeling, the same sense of community and oneness by listening to "All we are saying, is give peace a chance" in an arena of like minded people.
 
Is it really a surprise that church's are continuing their trend away from 'God' way and getting tied down in 'dogma' seeing as the church divided itself within a couple hundred years of the very person it was built on?

"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it." Matthew 16:18

"Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. -Matthew 12:25

"But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites, because you shut off the kingdom of heaven from people; for you do not enter in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in." Matthew 13:13

Was Christ ever solely contained in a 'building' or 'denomination'?

"Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him." John 14:6-7

If a church isn't unified with all 'believers' it is no church at all.

"I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd." John 10:16

Here is a small note I had made from an article I read once that I think holds a good point.

"None save God Himself can know the mysteries of His own nature. And who are we to curse our brethren, because they see the mysteries at an angle a little different from our own?"

I think you had more of a 'specific' type of church in mind with your post, but I see no difference when I look through the many different churches and their beliefs. Don't get me wrong, some churches I have been to are great and you can see the genuine love of 'God' in its members but that is not due to the name on the door or the fact that it is a church but that the 'spirit' is residing in it's members. The church(as in 'buildings' or 'denominations') is divided which means it cannot be what Christ spoke of when he spoke of the church or his 'body'.

Not meaning to offend here but just calling it as I see it.

"On whatsoever road a man approaches Me, on that road do I welcome him, for all roads are Mine."
 
handy said:
Sorry, I guess in all my bloviating, I didn't stress my point for the thread enough.

The point of the thread isn't what kind of "flavor" of church one likes.



Also, just how are we saved anyway?

I think it is about "flavor". We are saved by the death and resurrection of Jesus. Not saved by preaching and judging the behavior of others. So it doesn't matter what flavor church you enjoy. Some people like to view the glass as half full while other like a half empty glass.
 
Again, it's not about flavor. Or denominationalism. For all believers are united within the Body of Christ, for that is the church anyway.

What I'm driving at, it what is the purpose of the church in relation to the gospel. Are we to "spread" the gospel by making church a really cool place for non-Christians to come on Sunday mornings? Or, is the purpose of our gathering together, which we are exhorted not to neglect to, firstly, worship God, and just as importantly equip Christians to better meet the needs of the world?

The reason why I brought up "seeker friendly" is because the purpose of seeker friendly churches is to make church an appealing place for non-Christians to come, but is this Biblical? Are we to purpose our worship and our fellowship for the non-Christian rather than for family time.
 
handy said:
Again, it's not about flavor. Or denominationalism. For all believers are united within the Body of Christ, for that is the church anyway.

What I'm driving at, it what is the purpose of the church in relation to the gospel. Are we to "spread" the gospel by making church a really cool place for non-Christians to come on Sunday mornings? Or, is the purpose of our gathering together, which we are exhorted not to neglect to, firstly, worship God, and just as importantly equip Christians to better meet the needs of the world?

The reason why I brought up "seeker friendly" is because the purpose of seeker friendly churches is to make church an appealing place for non-Christians to come, but is this Biblical? Are we to purpose our worship and our fellowship for the non-Christian rather than for family time.

Who did Jesus fellowship with?

Personally, I think a BBQ with family and friends on a Sunday afternoon is far more beneficial then sitting in a pew listening to a sermon about demons possessing 'whatever the term of the day is'.
 
handy said:
The reason why I brought up "seeker friendly" is because the purpose of seeker friendly churches is to make church an appealing place for non-Christians to come, but is this Biblical?

Something here that I think we can relate on is I don't think the 'gospel' needs to be 'sold'. By trying to make the 'gospel' appealing all one is doing is 'selling out' for number of followers. Not what Jesus taught. His 'gospel' was real, something to live, one that moves people forward in unity, draws people together in love, 'radiates' this love to those who come in contact with this 'body', helps in times of trouble, gives without expecting something in return, and puts the 'messenger' below those receiving the message.

What message did Christianity send when Haiti got hit with an earthquake and churches and forums 'lit up' with it being God's judgement relieving 'christians' of their 'duty' to help those in need because after all, who wants to interfere with God's judgement. Where was Christ found? I seen Him in those that joined together in whatever way they were able to, regardless of religion, race, or creed, in order to bring help to those affected by the tragedy. Where did the love go for our neighbors?
 
handy said:
OK, I alluded to this on a different thread and decided I really couldn't derail that one, so I started a new one.

The subject is "seeker friendly" churches, and I'll start with the quote from "seeker friendly" pastor extraordinaire, Rick Warren:

“More people are won to Christ by feeling God’s presence than by all of our apologetic arguments combined. … It is the sense of God’s presence that melts hearts and explodes mental barriersâ€
The Purpose Driven Church (“Worship Can Be a Witnessâ€)p.241

I question that. I question whether this is even Biblical. Does the Bible teach us that the saved are saved by feeling God's presence? Generally, in the Bible, the unsaved's reaction to feeling God's presence is one of abject terror and fear, or such a complete cluelessness about what they are seeing that they write it off as drunkenness, as in the case of Pentecost. I always thought that the saved were saved by faith, faith in Jesus Christ, that He died on the cross because our sin and that we find forgiveness of our sin in Him. When Peter preached to the unsaved that were mocking those at Pentecost, it wasn't exactly a "feel good" "uplifting" message. He basically told them they had nailed to the cross an innocent man, "God has made Him both Lord and Christ - this Jesus whom you crucified."
I don't see, and perhaps I need someone to point them out, Scriptures that tell us that those who are saved are saved because they had a warm uplifting experience in which they "felt" God's presence.

I grew up being taught, and finding it verified in God's Word, that the purpose of the church is the equipping of the saints to go out into the world and share the gospel, complete with the message of our fallen and sinful nature and just what exactly we are being saved from (gasp, hell). It seems with the onset of seeker friendly churches, that the idea is now that the saints are just to bring the unsaved to worship services that are uplifting and emotionally charged, and most importantly of all: comfortingly familiar (with the latest in current trends in music and plenty of coffee, snacks, fun things for the kids to do, basketball teams that one can sign up for, etc.). "Negative" messages, such as our sinful natures, hell, the fact that we are responsible for the Cross, are diminished if not ignored altogether.

If I could see, within the past 25 years or so, that the Church was making a huge impact for the cause of Christ throughout the world, I would figure, hey, God's moving so who am I to question it. But, I don't see it. What I do see, is the Church is getting more and more fleshy, with issues like divorce, fornication, homosexuality, and a host of other sins, being more and more embraced by the church as being the way things are and don't worry because God loves you, yes He does.

I mean, my best friend had to leave their "seeker friendly" church after 30 years of membership there, because they needed to get their daughter out of the youth group, because the youth group kids were all involved in drugs, being tattooed, cutting and sending nude pictures of themselves to each other.

My opinion about these seeker friendly churches is that they are Mrs. Dash, a salt-substitute. It tastes good, but it's by no means the essential nutrient we need to live.


I have felt God's presence. But there are times when I feel like screaming "GOD, where are you!". And then He makes His presence in my life known to me again.


I agree with what you posted.The churches today have brought in the masses by giving them the world.
 
It seems that part of this question first should be, is church for unbelievers?

The answer is no. The bible never directs us to go out and bring unbeleivers into church to get saved. Instead the bible instructs us to go into the nations preacing the gospel making disciples who then become the church.

Church is to be BELIEVER oriented. The whole idea of these seeker sensative churches is to bring in unbeleivers by worldly ways to rake in the $$ but even if you were a person who believed it was to get more people saved, what it is is a way to attract peoples flesh, while letting the people who are already saved in your church starve to death because you have removed the Lord and truth from the church in order to accomidate unbelievers.
 
GodspromisesRyes said:
It seems that part of this question first should be, is church for unbelievers?

The answer is no. The bible never directs us to go out and bring unbeleivers into church to get saved. Instead the bible instructs us to go into the nations preacing the gospel making disciples who then become the church.

Church is to be BELIEVER oriented. The whole idea of these seeker sensative churches is to bring in unbeleivers by worldly ways to rake in the $$ but even if you were a person who believed it was to get more people saved, what it is is a way to attract peoples flesh, while letting the people who are already saved in your church starve to death because you have removed the Lord and truth from the church in order to accomidate unbelievers.
I agree GPR. The "seeker friendly" denominations have allowed the world to come in and dictate what goes on, everyone gets entertained yet at the sacrifice of the gospel. everyone is accepted, no matter the sin, yet still at the sacrifice of the gospel. it is kind of a "showtime religion" and instead of them giving the people what they need (the Truth), they give them what they want.
 
I agree too. DarcyLu used the word "entertained" which is synonymous with "amuse". Here is what Webster's site has to say:

synonyms amuse, divert, entertain mean to pass or cause to pass the time pleasantly. amuse suggests that one's attention is engaged lightly or frivolously <amuse yourselves while I prepare dinner>. divert implies the distracting of the attention from worry or routine occupation especially by something funny <a light comedy to divert the tired businessman>. entertain suggests supplying amusement or diversion by specially prepared or contrived methods <a magician entertaining children at a party>
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amuse

Here is another one:

late 15c., from M.Fr. amuser "divert, cause to muse," from a "at, to" (but here probably a causal prefix) + muser "ponder, stare fixedly." Sense of "divert from serious business, tickle the fancy of" is recorded from 1630s, but through 18c. the primary meaning was "deceive, cheat" by first occupying the attention. Bemuse retains more of the original meaning.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=amuse
 
It's interesting.


Main Entry: 3muse
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French, from Latin Musa, from Greek Mousa
Date: 14th century

1 capitalized : any of the nine sister goddesses in Greek mythology presiding over song and poetry and the arts and sciences
2 : a source of inspiration; especially : a guiding genius
3 : poet
 
handy said:
Again, it's not about flavor. Or denominationalism. For all believers are united within the Body of Christ, for that is the church anyway.

What I'm driving at, it what is the purpose of the church in relation to the gospel. Are we to "spread" the gospel by making church a really cool place for non-Christians to come on Sunday mornings? Or, is the purpose of our gathering together, which we are exhorted not to neglect to, firstly, worship God, and just as importantly equip Christians to better meet the needs of the world?

The reason why I brought up "seeker friendly" is because the purpose of seeker friendly churches is to make church an appealing place for non-Christians to come, but is this Biblical? Are we to purpose our worship and our fellowship for the non-Christian rather than for family time.
salt in a wound burns, it also keeps the the food that is seasoned with it from rotting. we are to be a little salty so as to make the lost thirst. one's faith must be grounded in the bible and our trust in the lord, if not then are we saved.

one can do what ricks says at a rock concert then, no preaching just and emo band telling how good you are then, sighs, i hope my church doesnt take after this, my pastor does visit the saddle back church from time to time.
 
Back
Top