W
Watchman_2
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
I never said the 6:2 and 19:12 crowns were the same. I proved your word study argument that...
("Thus, if the 6:2 rider is the same, the 6:2 rider would wear the same crown as the 19:11-12 rider.")
...therefore...
("The rider of the Rev. 6:2 white horse is Satan.")
...is garbage because the 6:2 rider wears the same crown as Jesus. You have just further disproved your argument when you note that Jesus wears the same crowns as the Beast.:rolling
That is exactly how you folks will fall for Satan's endtime deception! You think Christ will return wearing the same thorny crown given to Him at His crucifixion by the Romans; whereas, Rev. 19 makes it clear that Christ does not wear the crown of derision -- but, He wears many crowns as the KING OF KINGS.
Satan takes advantage of those like you, who are prone for deception, by appearing as the resurrected Lamb. Yet, God gives a further clue, which should alert you folks to the fact that this rider is an imposter -
Rev 6:2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
As is plainly written, the rider of this white horse does not bring the thorny crown given at the crucifixion time [Mat. 27:29], but is given this crown. If this rider was the true Christ and not the imposter christ, there would be no need to give him a crown at all -- he should already have it.
The study of 'crowns' only proves that the 6:2 rider is Satan.