Sons of God

[n2thelight]

Just wanted to add,had satan not rebelled,we would have never been made flesh.

 

[JudaicChristian]

:rolling Genesis 6:1
[ Sons of God and Daughters of Men ] When mankind began to multiply on the earth and daughters were born to them,

Genesis 6:2
the sons of God [men] saw that the daughters of man were beautiful, and they took any they chose as wives for themselves.

Genesis 6:4
The Nephilim were on the earth both in those days [and afterwards,] when the sons of God came to the daughters of man, who bore children to them. They were the powerful men of old, the famous men. [Nephilim translated means "Fallen ones." Those [men] who are of a very low moral grade.]

Job 1:6
[ Satan's First Test of Job ] One day the sons of God [men] came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them.

Job 2:1
[ Satan's Second Test of Job ] One day the sons of God[men] came again to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came with them to present himself before the LORD.

Job 38:7
while the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Matthew 5:9
Blessed are the peacemakers, because they will be called sons of God.

Luke 20:36
For they cannot die anymore, because they are like [angels/messengers] and are sons of God, since they are sons of the resurrection.

Galatians 3:26
for you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus.

Psalm 82:6
I said, "You are gods; you are all sons of the Most High.

John 10:34
Jesus answered them, "Isn't it written in your law, I said, you are gods ?
33"We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God [a god]."

John 10
34Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'? 35If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken— 36what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, 'I am God's Son'?

 

[NJBeliever]

Regarding Enoch, the book gets so much love even though it's not Scripture. I don't get it.

But even without Enoch, the Bible certainly teaches that the Sons of God (meaning angelic beings) did have relations with women and offsrping. And they were punished by being put into hell (not the lake of fire) until Judgment.

 

[JudaicChristian]

Regarding Enoch, the book gets so much love even though it's not Scripture. I don't get it.

But even without Enoch, the Bible certainly teaches that the Sons of God (meaning angelic beings) did have relations with women and offsrping. And they were punished by being put into hell (not the lake of fire) until Judgment.

If the word angel was translated into English it would read "messenger." Angels are part of the Pagan religion. You need to come to an understanding that there is a difference between "interpretations' and "translations." Also "literal" from "parable."

 

[NJBeliever]

Regarding Enoch, the book gets so much love even though it's not Scripture. I don't get it.

But even without Enoch, the Bible certainly teaches that the Sons of God (meaning angelic beings) did have relations with women and offsrping. And they were punished by being put into hell (not the lake of fire) until Judgment.

If the word angel was translated into English it would read "messenger." Angels are part of the Pagan religion. You need to come to an understanding that there is a difference between "interpretations' and "translations." Also "literal" from "parable."

I didn't say "angel" I said angelic. The Biblical term in Gen 6 is not angel. It's Sons of god. B'nai Elohim. And again, the Bible confirms that they did have offspring with human women. And they were punished for it.

 

[JudaicChristian]

Regarding Enoch, the book gets so much love even though it's not Scripture. I don't get it.

But even without Enoch, the Bible certainly teaches that the Sons of God (meaning angelic beings) did have relations with women and offsrping. And they were punished by being put into hell (not the lake of fire) until Judgment.

If the word angel was translated into English it would read "messenger." Angels are part of the Pagan religion. You need to come to an understanding that there is a difference between "interpretations' and "translations." Also "literal" from "parable."

I didn't say "angel" I said angelic. The Biblical term in Gen 6 is not angel. It's Sons of god. B'nai Elohim. And again, the Bible confirms that they did have offspring with human women. And they were punished for it.

The word angelic means "pertaining to angels." We who are the Elect are "b'nai elohim." [Born gods of the living.] The men of the pit are the dead, who live among us. They are the serpent seed. Elohim is [God/El] of the Living, and His name is Yahwah. [Life Began.]
Yahshua is our [Life Savour,] and he is "God's Salvation." Michael

 

[watchman F]

CRAZy

Well, this part of your post is true. It was crazy....lol

Matter of fact this whole thread is nuts. where do you people come from?....lol

 

[freeway]

[quote="(THE)":20zv5ijm]

CRAZy

Well, this part of your post is true. It was crazy....lol

Matter of fact this whole thread is nuts. where do you people come from?....lol[/quote:20zv5ijm]
Well I come from Portland Oregon, and as far as this whole thread being crazy, is that all you have to say? Personally I believe the bible is very clear, There were Giants in those days.. I may be knew at this English stuff, but Giant means Giant.. How they got here is debatable to some. To others its clear cut "the sons of God" took daughters of man for wives... seems pretty clear to me.. Giants are talked about all through the old testament. So unless you have something constructive to add maybe you should'nt try so fast to belittle what others are talking about.. just a thought, but it mine. as crazy as it may seem.

 

[watchman F]

[quote="(THE)":1coiuqic]

CRAZy

Well, this part of your post is true. It was crazy....lol

Matter of fact this whole thread is nuts. where do you people come from?....lol

Well I come from Portland Oregon, and as far as this whole thread being crazy, is that all you have to say? Personally I believe the bible is very clear, There were Giants in those days.. I may be knew at this English stuff, but Giant means Giant.. How they got here is debatable to some. To others its clear cut "the sons of God" took daughters of man for wives... seems pretty clear to me.. Giants are talked about all through the old testament. So unless you have something constructive to add maybe you should'nt try so fast to belittle what others are talking about.. just a thought, but it mine. as crazy as it may seem. [/quote:1coiuqic]Well as far as you post goes there is no doubt there were giants in the land, and that the sons of God took wives of the daughters of men, but the giants weren't the offspring off their union, and they certainly has never been demon/human mix breeds, and if you have read this thread full of science fiction passed off as scripture then you would have seen why I was amazed by it.

 

[freeway]

watchman F says:
Well as far as you post goes there is no doubt there were giants in the land, and that the sons of God took wives of the daughters of men, but the giants weren't the offspring off their union, and they certainly has never been demon/human mix breeds, and if you have read this thread full of science fiction passed off as scripture then you would have seen why I was amazed by it.

Matthew 22:30, says, “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.†However, this does not say “angels are not able to marry.†it only indicates that angels do not marry, It nowhere says that angels are not sexed male, female but only they do not marry. Matthew 22:30 is alluring to the “angels in heaven†that still worship God. It is not referring to fallen angels, who do not care about God’s creation, and man. These fallen angels “demons†actively seek ways to destroy God’s plan. The plain fact is that God’s “holy angels†do not marry or engage in sexual relations does not mean the same is true of Satan and his demons.
Is it a contradiction to say that angels are sexless and then to say that the sons of God were fallen angels who took human form and took human females for themselves? Remember these angel are out to do away with Gods plan, “Jesus.†How better to do this than to pollute the seed of Eve, the seed of woman and the seed of the serpent. While angels are spiritual beings, Hebrews 1:14, they can and do appear in human form, Mark 16:5. The men of Sodom and Gomorrah wanted to have sex with the two angels who were with Lot Genesis 19:1-5. It is true that angels are capable of taking on human form, even to the point of replicating human sexuality and possibly even reproduction. Question? Why do the fallen angels not do this more often? Because, God has imprisoned the fallen angels who committed this evil sin, so that the other fallen angels would not do the same? described in Jude 6. Earlier Hebrew interpreters and apocryphal writings are unanimous in holding to the view that fallen angels are the “sons of God†mentioned in Genesis 6:1-4.
So if this is science fiction? Well then “cotty beam me upâ€

 

[NJBeliever]

The word angelic means "pertaining to angels." We who are the Elect are "b'nai elohim." [Born gods of the living.] The men of the pit are the dead, who live among us. They are the serpent seed. Elohim is [God/El] of the Living, and His name is Yahwah. [Life Began.]
Yahshua is our [Life Savour,] and he is "God's Salvation." Michael

Nowhere in the Bible is B'nai Elohim used to describe believers. That's just your own statement. B'nai Elohim is only used to refer to Heavenly beings (see Job 1:6, 2:!, 8:7). God bless.

 

[JudaicChristian]

The word angelic means "pertaining to angels." We who are the Elect are "b'nai elohim." [Born gods of the living.] The men of the pit are the dead, who live among us. They are the serpent seed. Elohim is [God/El] of the Living, and His name is Yahwah. [Life Began.]
Yahshua is our [Life Savour,] and he is "God's Salvation." Michael

Nowhere in the Bible is B'nai Elohim used to describe believers. That's just your own statement. B'nai Elohim is only used to refer to Heavenly beings (see Job 1:6, 2:!, 8:7). God bless.

Do you read and give any thought to what I wrote? It sure dose not look like it. There are those who already have life immortal and we who will. There is no such thing as angels, that is imagining vain things. There are only messengers in scripture, and there are angels in Paganism. The men who translated our scriptures do not aways do a good job of it. God said: I will create man in our image, and our likeness.

Jude 1:5. I will remind you although you once knew this, how Yahwah, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that did not believe.
6. Those messengers did not keep their first estate, and they were removed from their place, and He has reserved for them everlasting chains of darkness for that great day of judgment.

There were no "angels" who came out of Egypt with Moses.

Hebrews 12:22
But you have come to Mount Zion, to the heavenly Jerusalem, the city of the living God. You have come to thousands upon thousands of [angels/messengers] in joyful assembly, 23to the [church/congregation] of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven.