H
Hitch
Guest
- Thread starter
- #21
Hitch, Despite your meanspirited tone, you continue to deny truth. You didn't you? Say of yourself, "I am a Calvinist". But you know Calvin believed Mary is "ever virgin". In that you are not, then, a Calvinist. If a man teaches any major error, he should not be referred to as a teacher. It is not a major error, but to think ours is the first generation of Christians to come to the Bible is ignoring the facts of history. The truths of Christianity do not change, and our opinions of them matter not. Christ's truth remains the same. You're bored with my words? What about me? You still have not produced one text that says "the children of Mary and Joseph". Then your mind wanders to Abraham Lincoln. Can you not stick to the topic. Get a hold on reality here. Why refer to Lincoln in a discussion on Christ and Mary? What has Lincoln got to do with anything, for goodness sake? Just wondering! God bless (you). I'm sure you mean well, you're just a bit illogical. In Erie PA Scott R. Harrington[/QUOTE]Actually, you just bring up irrelevancy like "Abraham Lincoln", which is most illogical. When you get frustrated, you just say whatever pops into your head. I believe if you will read my other posts regarding the Virgin Mary that I showed from the ONT [/quote ] LOL another mind reader .
So that perpetual virgin nonsense has no support at all. None you can quote . You have offered nothing from scripture. Please keep to topic.
Right up there with rapture drivel.
Go tell your mother she wants you.
Get back to topic or bug off.