farouk
Member
I am not sure about the history of tattoos, but if it does have pagan origins, then a tattoo, even a godly one is wrong. It's just like Halloween. It is a Satanic holiday, and even if you dress up as a Bible character to go trick-or-treating, you are still participating in the holiday. Your motives might be good, but people might assume that you are just like everyone else in society. The Bible says that we need to be in the world but not of it (John 17:16).
I found this quote from an article http://www.bible.com/bibleanswers_result.php?id=230 that might be helpful. "Some Christians argue that they have the name Jesus or some Biblical word or sign tattooed on their body so they can witness by the tattoo. However, God is more concerned how we are living our lives than by displaying a religious mark on our body. That is not the highest way He would have us witness. The Lord would rather us witness to others by the character of Christ being demonstrated in our lives than display Christian slogans that many times are not matched by the life of Christ." (Under "Our Bodies are Our Temples") I think it brings up a good point. Our Christian character is more important than any displays of Christianity (a cross necklace, a T-shirt, etc.) That is what people remember most.
Psalm28.7:
Thanks for your thoughtful post. I guess the matter of origins can be looked at from many angles. I reckon also that it a key point would be whether any matter or thing can be sanctified, whatever the origin, however obscure.
Maybe one example, among many, could be in how many names if studied, could be found to have pagan origins. Like, for instance, Wednesday actually referred originally to the day of the Norse god Woden. In Portuguese, however, the word for Wednesday is Quarta-Feira, which literally means fourth day of the week. So does this mean we should start calling Wednesday the Fourth Day of the Week, in case someone decided that you and I are following Woden if we refer to Wednesday? No, of course not. Or does this suggest that we shouldn't advertise or attend Bible studies on Wednesdays for the same reason? Of course not. More likely, we should preferably take the attitude: 'This is the day that the Lord hath, made, we will be glad and rejoice in it'. Any pagan aspect to Wednesday may be safely regarded as having been lost in the mists of time.
I had a conversation with someone with a Bible verse tattoo a while back. I'm sure the person has also had other conversations with other people also. Clearly the view was taken that the design was sanctified to the person that obtained it. This does not mean that everyone will think the same way, or ought to think the same way. Some might like a Bible ref. design. You might think all tatts are ugly, period. Well, that's fine. There lies the importance of Christian liberty, I guess.
The fact that someone has a bad tattoo doesn't necessarily negate the fact that other person with for example a Bible ref. design might have a profitable conversation with someone as a result, from time to time.
Thanks again for your comment. Blessings.
Last edited by a moderator: