Pard
Member
As for the Bishop and Geneva Bible's i have never read them or examined them. And i dont mind a conversation about them. I have read before that there major problems with them, so that is why the KJV had to come along, the KJV was a very professional translation and took 7 years. The KJV Scholars were grateful for the work done by previous scholars in there work on the Bible.
Assuming you like the KJV for more than just your belief that it is the only word of God, or something, I think you should look at the Geneva. It's a very well done and I personally think it flows better than the KJV.
And they were all (well Geneva and KJV, the Bishop was a rip of the Geneva) based off of Tyndale's work from the early 1500s. The major difference between the two, besides the fact that the Geneva was the Bible protestants used and the KJV was the one that Catholics/CoEs used, is that the Geneva holds that the Old Testament is still very much alive and important (the idea that Jesus didn't abolish but fulfill). The KJV holds more to the case that Jesus abolished.
And the other thing is the Geneva is packed with notes from the translators, allowing for more incite into their decision making and also allowing for some decision making of your own.
Sorry if it sounds like I am stumping for the Geneva, my translation of choice is actually a few translations taken in equal parts, Geneva being one of them, but I did a project for school. It was on the history of a book and I picked the Geneva Bible.