Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
A summary should have been provided, but your response is rather silly.The Barbarian said:Don't ask me to see the clip, just summarize.
Sanitarium said:Oh my..... I was hoping it was satire but alas the ending showed it was not.
What a sorry state to be in - knowledge at your fingertips, yet the arrogance to shun it.
That statement was rather odd to me as well.The Barbarian said:God is a force?
If you're a pantheist, I suppose.
John said:.... totopic ...pleeease?
Sorry John. Though, I'm not quite sure what there is to talk about.John said:.... totopic ...pleeease?
The video suggests religion and science are compatible.
I'm not sure we have many NOMA takers here.John said:I just thought there was some people here that subscribed to NOMA (religion and science do not overlap)
John said:I just thought there was some people here that subscribed to NOMA (religion and science do not overlap)
NOMA stands for Non-Overlapping MAgisteria. It is a concept popularized by the late Stephen Jay Gould. He suggested religion and science can co-exist because they answer fundamentally different questions within fundamentally different fields that do not overlap. If I recall correctly religion deals with moral questions and science with questions regarding the natural world.Fembot said:I believe that they can both, peacefully, co-exist.
Are you sure? It has been a while since my reading of "Rock of Ages," but I don't recall him saying they were compatible. Rather, they were simply "not incompatible." And his definition of religion, if I recall correctly, dealt solely with the domain of morality -- at least, ideally. Though, as I noted, it has been sometime since I have read the work.The Barbarian said:Gould's essay on NOMA suggests that he thinks science and religion are perfectly compatible.