Shilohsfoal
Member
If a little horn came up on the heads of the beast and called itself Israel, would any recognize it as a beast ?Would you understand if it were antichrist or would you believe it is God's chosen people as it claims?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The four heads were Alexanders generals. The little horn that grew in power is the Vatican, and the beast/nation she rides is Italy. The Vatican is the smallest nation in the world. The Romans were Anti Christian. For more than 2000 years Rome has been known as the city of the seven hills. The hills around the Vatican were called gods, and had temples dedicated to them upon those hills.Shilohsfoal said:If a little horn came up on the heads of the beast and called itself Israel, would any recognize it as a beast ?Would you understand if it were antichrist or would you believe it is God's chosen people as it claims?
the little horn is a spirit from the bottomless pit, not a whole nation. beasts in the bible are kingdoms and in the end times the beasts are a spiritual kingdom and a physical governmental kingdom.Shilohsfoal said:If a little horn came up on the heads of the beast and called itself Israel, would any recognize it as a beast ?Would you understand if it were antichrist or would you believe it is God's chosen people as it claims?
The beasts being spoken of are nations. That whore is a single nation/beast that sits among the waters/nations.GodspromisesRyes said:the little horn is a spirit from the bottomless pit, not a whole nation. beasts in the bible are kingdoms and in the end times the beasts are a spiritual kingdom and a physical governmental kingdom.Shilohsfoal said:If a little horn came up on the heads of the beast and called itself Israel, would any recognize it as a beast ?Would you understand if it were antichrist or would you believe it is God's chosen people as it claims?
WE Christians, jew or gentile are Gods chosen people, Everyone who is chosen will come to faith in Christ Jesus and be saved and added to the body of Christ. WE are the Israel of God.- Unbelievers of " israel" are antichrist until they come to faith, they are only israel after the flesh and are united with the rest of the world under antichrist spirits.
I believe this is showing that the whore covers the whole earth, she sits on peoples multitudes nations languages. She is not one nation or beast, she is over all the nations over the whole beast. Personally I believe the beast that she sits on is the NWO government which is the nations of the world united as one government like at babel where they try to have peace and unity without the real God, in their own, and demonic power.mdo757 said:The beasts being spoken of are nations. That whore is a single nation/beast that sits among the waters/nations.
Revelation 17:15
Then the angel said to me, "The waters you saw, where the Whore/prostitute sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and languages.
I see where many people believe that this is the catholic church but i dont agree with that, although i agree that the catholic church is 100% part of the whore, i do not believe that the whore is just an entity like that church. Here is why, The same spirits of wickedness have been at work since the beginning and were hating and killing the saints since able. There was no catholic church then. Jesus and peter and paul said that the jews were responsible for the blood of the saints from able to zacharias who was slain between the porch and the altarmdo757 said:Daniel 7:8
"While I was thinking about the horns, there before me was another horn, a little one, which came up among them; and three of the first horns were uprooted before it. This horn had eyes like the eyes of a man and a mouth that spoke boastfully.
Daniel 7:20
I also wanted to know about the ten horns on its head and about the other horn that came up, before which three of them fell—the horn that looked more imposing than the others and that had eyes and a mouth that spoke boastfully.
Daniel 7:21
As I watched, this horn was waging war against the saints and defeating them,
The Romans and the Roman Catholic Church won the war against the other Christians.
it sounds as if you believe the little horn to be the nation of israel? while i dont agree, simply because i believe the little horn is a spirit king, i would like to hear what you have to say further on this if you will go into detailShilohsfoal said:Sounds like you two dont realize what the little horn that came up is.Would you consider it if it were diverse from the first ten horns that came up?Would you consider it if it defeated three of those first horns?Would you consider it if its look was stouter than its fellows though it be a little horn?
This is where you are in error: There are two dragons, and there are many beast/nations. The Jews get blamed because they did not accept the message of the Kingdom being preached; as a result chaos from the beast resulted.Shilohsfoal said:MDO
If you are going to judge who babylon is by the death of the rightous then lets not forget this death.
Mt 27;24-25
When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing,but that rather a tumult was made,he took water,and washed his hands before the multitude,saying,I am innocent of the blood of this just person;see ye to it.
Then answerd all the people,and said,His blood be on us,and on our children.
Its not hard to overlook Jesus's words in the gospel but you will not have any knowledge if you do.
Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
mdo757 said:This is where you are in error: There are two dragons, and there are many beast/nations. The Jews get blamed because they did not accept the message of the Kingdom being preached; as a result chaos from the beast resulted.Shilohsfoal said:MDO
If you are going to judge who babylon is by the death of the rightous then lets not forget this death.
Mt 27;24-25
When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing,but that rather a tumult was made,he took water,and washed his hands before the multitude,saying,I am innocent of the blood of this just person;see ye to it.
Then answerd all the people,and said,His blood be on us,and on our children.
Its not hard to overlook Jesus's words in the gospel but you will not have any knowledge if you do.
Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the rightous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of rightous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
researcher said:Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the rightous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of rightous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
Babylon the great = Jerusalem? yes.
Destroyed in 70AD? yes
Never to rise again? correct. lol
Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
:yes :P
Shilohsfoal said:Jerusalem was destroyed?LOL
Only a wound.It lived.
researcher said:Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the rightous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of rightous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
Babylon the great = Jerusalem? yes.
Destroyed in 70AD? yes
Never to rise again? correct. lol
Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
:yes :P
When Napoleon removed the Pope from power in 1798, people thought the papacy would never rise to power again. When the Papacy was re-established the news papers read: "The Wound is Healed." And the peoples were astonished that it was re-established. Because of what is written in scripture people believed Israel would rise to power again. If Israel would not have rejected the message, the out come for the world would have been different.researcher said:Rev 18;24
And in her was found the blood of prophets,and of saints,and of all that were slain upon the earth.
Mt 23;35
That upon you may come all the rightous blood shed upon the earth,from the blood of rightous Abel unto the blood of Zechariah son of Barachias,whom ye slew between the temple and the alter.
Please for once take note of the above verses.If you are correct and Rome is Babylon OF REV 18;24,then Jesus would be incorrect in MT 23;35.Now who would you have me believe ,you or Jesus?
Babylon the great = Jerusalem? yes.
Destroyed in 70AD? yes
Never to rise again? correct. lol
Mat 23:35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.
Mat 23:36 Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.
:yes :P
mdo757 said:F. C. Baur (1792–1860), professor of theology at Tübingen in Germany, the first scholar to critique Acts and the Pauline Epistles, and founder of the Tübingen School of theology, argued that Paul, as the "Apostle to the Gentiles", was in violent opposition to the original 12 Apostles. Baur considers the Acts of the Apostles were late and unreliable. This debate has continued ever since, with Adolf Deissmann (1866–1937) and Richard Reitzenstein (1861–1931) emphasising Paul's Greek inheritance and Albert Schweitzer stressing his dependence on Judaism.
Maccoby theorizes that Paul synthesized Judaism, Gnosticism, and mysticism to create Christianity as a cosmic savior religion. According to Maccoby, Paul's Pharisaism was his own invention, though actually he was probably associated with the Sadducees. Maccoby attributes the origins of Christian anti-Semitism to Paul and claims that Paul's view of women, though inconsistent, reflects his Gnosticism in its misogynist aspects.
Professor Robert Eisenman of California State University, Long Beach argues that Paul was a member of the family of Herod the Great. Professor Eisenman makes a connection between Paul and an individual identified by Josephus as "Saulus," a "kinsman of Agrippa." Another oft-cited element of the case for Paul as a member of Herod's family is found in Romans 16:11 where Paul writes, "Greet Herodion, my kinsman." This is a minority view in the academic community.
Perhaps the most speculative argument is made by British author Ralph Ellis, whose recent book King Jesus identifies Saul with Flavius Josephus, the first-century historian. In order to achieve this, Ellis has to make Saul very young (14 yrs) on his first evangelical tour of the Mediterranean.
Among the critics of Paul the Apostle was Thomas Jefferson who wrote that Paul was the "first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus." Howard Brenton's 2005 play Paul takes a skeptical view of his conversion.
Paul of Tarsus, also called Paul the Apostle, the Apostle Paul, or Saint Paul, (Ancient Greek ????? (Saul), ?????? (Saulos), and ?????? (Paulos); Latin: Paulus or Paullus; Hebrew: ???? ?????? Å a?ul HaTarsi (Saul of Tarsus)[2] (c.5 BC - c.67 AD),[1] was a Hellenistic Jew who called himself the "Apostle to the Gentiles" and is considered the Founder of Modern Christianity. Together with Saint Peter and James the Just, he is also the most notable of early Christian missionaries.
F.F. Powell argues that Paul made use of many of the ideas of the Greek philosopher Plato in his epistles, sometimes even using the same metaphors and language. For example, in Phaedrus, Socrates says that the heavenly ideals are perceived as though "through a glass dimly." These words are echoed by Paul in 1 Corinthians 13:12.[/size]