Bick said:
MY COMMENTS: I'm not sure exactly, but it sounds as if you are equating "resurrection" with "putting in incorruption".
I assume you can read, so what is our Lord Jesus showing with the story about Lazarus and the rich man? Did He not show that both of them died with their flesh buried, yet their souls were taken to one of two places in the heavenly dimension? (I'm not Catholic, so I'm not pushing their various doctrines on Purgatory.) But either you accept what our Lord Jesus showed there, or you don't. I choose to accept the objects and that order He showed there, regardless that Lazarus and the rich man may have been figurative individuals. The order our Lord Jesus revealed with that just so happens to align with what Paul taught in 2 Cor.5, and also with Eccl.12:5-7 of what happens at flesh death.
Paul's Message in 1 Cor.15 is teaching the same thing, and even declares there's two different types of bodies, one that is natural or of the flesh, and one that is the "spiritual body". Paul even said that as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly (1 Cor.15:49). Have only Christ's servants borne the image of the earthy? No, the unjust have too.
That's 4 Bible witnesses showing the difference between two dimensions of existence, the earthy and the heavenly. A body of incorruption is of the heavenly order, the "image of the heavenly", also what Paul called "a spiritual body". It is necessary first in order for "this mortal" to put on "immortality". That's what Paul taught when he showed for death to be swallowed up in victory through Christ, we must go through both changes, not just one.
Bick said:
The word for "resurrection" in the Greek is "anastasis" meaning "a standing or rising up" (Young's Concordance). There are recorded in the Bible a number of resurrections, but, except for Christ, they died again.
There's a major difference between our Lord Jesus doing miracles on earth with raising certain ones from the dead to show God's Power, and the actual resurrection. You do realize the difference don't you, since Christ was the firstfruit of the resurrection? In all NT cases, when the "resurrection" is being spoken of, it's either about Christ's resurrection from the dead, or the resurrection to come. How then were the dead raised through Christ and His Apostles, and even through Elijah then? That should be enough to show you how those 4 Scripture witnesses above show that difference too. To be specific, it's pointing to the body of incorruption already existing, but not one's soul putting on immortality which is required for the resurrection. None that have died have put on immortality yet, though they already have the "image of the heavenly" like Christ showed with Lazarus and the rich man in Luke 16.
Bick said:
So, when the wicked are resurrected to be judged, they would still be corruptible.
In Rev. 20:15, we are told that the wicked, whose names are not in the book of life, were cast into the lake of fire, which is the second death for them.
This, to me, is the "the resurrection of damnation (judgment)" the Lord spoke about.
What of Scripture like Rev.3:9, where our Lord Jesus says He will make those of the synagogue of Satan to come worship before the feet of His elect? What of those of the nations that Satan leads upon the "camp of the saints" just prior to the great white throne judgment? Where did they come from all of sudden? Zechariah 14 answers that, with the nations that are left after the day of Christ's coming. What of those put in the "outer darkness"? What of John 5:29 where Jesus declares at the sound of His voice ALL in the graves will be raised at the same time, both the just and the unjust? If you cover enough Scripture, and actually heed it, you'll find there's plenty of Biblical evidence for the wicked being raised also at Christ's coming.
Bick said:
I don't understand why you say we (alive) must go through two changes. Those who have died in Christ are the "corruptible", and we which are alive at the catching away, are the "mortals", the way Paul defines it.
Paul is pulling from Isaiah 25 in the 1 Corinthians 15 chapter about death being swallowed up in victory. So just WHEN, truly, is
all death swallowed up in victory? Didn't our Lord Jesus show there's such a thing as a "second death"? He sure did, and that "second death" is the destruction into the "lake of fire" at the end of His thousand years reign with His elect. Can you not see that's about TWO required changes, for Paul is covering that too in 1 Cor.15?
1 Cor 15:53
53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption,
and this mortal must put on immortality.
(KJV)
Those are 4 separate Greeks words in the manuscript. There's a division between the word "and".
After flesh death, is there still a part that can be killed? YES! For that's what our Lord Jesus warned us about in Luke 12:4-5 and Matt.10:28, to not fear those who can kill the body (flesh), and not our soul, but to fear Him Who can destroy both our body and soul in 'gehenna' ("hell"- put for the lake of fire event). It's the body of incorruption, a spiritual body with soul that goes into the lake of fire, for that's what Satan and his angels have; they've never been born in the flesh, and it's not written they ever will be. After Christ's coming and the resurrection, we all will have a body of incorruption and a soul. It's the soul that is the "this mortal" part Paul was speaking of. Only those who overcome in Christ will put on immortality of their soul. And that's the operation of BOTH deaths being swallowed up in victory through Christ Jesus.
Bick said:
In a sense, being "corruptible" and "mortal" are the same thing. We are "corruptible" and we are "mortal". But, for us alive at the calling of the Lord, there is only one change: putting on immortality.
That's probably the way many, many preachers have chosen to interpret 1 Cor.15:53. But Apostle Paul separated those four terms in the Greek. Your last statement would mean denial of what Paul said in that verse with those 4 different Greek words. In the previous part of that chapter, Paul was not specific of what "this mortal" putting on "immortality" is about, not until verse 53 does he mention it. Up to that point, he was only speaking of the idea of a 'body', corruption and incorruption, earthy vs. heavenly.
Bick said:
It may be also enlightening to know that in 1 Cor. 15:44-46, the word "natural" should be correctly rendered "soulish."
The Greek for "natural" is 'psuchikos', which means 'animate, sensuous, belonging to the breath'. It is distinct from the concept of a rational soul, because it's something animals have too. Also, Paul is making several clear distinctions between earthy bodies vs. heavenly bodies, and that's ample reason to know he was speaking of our animate flesh with that word "natural". He even compared God breathing into Adam's flesh when Adam became "a living soul", flesh becoming animate.
The simpliest way I can explain the depth of what Paul is teaching, is how he's describing two differnt realms (earthy vs. heavenly) and two different types of bodies (natural vs. spiritual). In 2 Cor.5, he declared that if our earthy tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavenly. Even there he's talking about the difference between a flesh earthy body and a heavenly spiritual body. He also says
'we' groan in our earthy body, earnestly desiring to be clothed with our house which is from heaven.
The big question is, what's the "we" that groans? What's the 'it' that seeks to be clothed with our house which is from heaven? And what part is that house or tabernacle, for both of those objects are something provided for 'what' to dwell in?
The we, or it part, is our soul, the real part of us, our person. That's the part which makes each one of us unique, and individually accountable to our Heavenly Father. The natural body is our earthy tabernacle our house now. And the spiritual body Paul taught is that house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. But BOTH are only a 'house', a body for something to dwell within. That something is our soul.
In this earthly realm, our soul dwells in a flesh natural body. It is corruptible, dies and decays, and goes back to the earthly elements where it came from. That body is temporal. But in the heavenly, our house is a spiritual body, a body of incorruption, one that can only be destroyed by God at the "second death" with perishing in the "lake of fire". If the body of incorruption perishes in the lake of fire, the soul dwelling within it perishes too. That is the "mortal" state Paul was talking about with "this mortal". To continue to live eternally, that mortal part (soul) MUST ALSO put on immortality through Christ Jesus.
This is why a mortal soul being resurrected to a body of incorruption (heavenly "spiritual body") does NOT mean automatic Salvation through Christ Jesus, because a 'mortal' soul MUST ALSO put on immortality to have eternal Life.
When the resurrection happens at Christ's coming, both the just AND the unjust will be resurrected (or changed) to bodies of incorruption (John 5:29; Acts 15:24). But those of the "resurrection of damnation" will STILL have mortal souls that will be subject to the "second death" in the "lake of fire". Those dead souls are still going to be with us throughout Christ's thousand years reign. And it's those dead souls of the still existing nations which Satan will deceive later at the end of that thousand years, and lead upon the "camp of the saints" on earth, per Rev.20.