Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I'm sorry, I didn't realize. So let's not have a discussion about universal salvation.Just a reminder that any discussion of universal salvation is a violation of the TOS.
Scripture says eternal torment so that's how I voted.
God is life, without God there is no life. Even Jesus called the living unsaved the dead. Being in Hell is perishing and dead because of the separation from God.
Tim said:What scriptures support your belief?
Two main problems with such a position are:I wanted to post this, because sometimes people will say things to me such as "You don't believe in the final punishment of the unsaved because you don't believe they are eternally tormented!" I certainly do believe the unsaved face final and permanent punishment, (Eternal Punishment, Matt 25:46), and this Final, Permanent, and Eternal Punishment is Death, just as the Bible says.
Two main problems with such a position are:
1. It undermines most of what Jesus says about hell, and
2. Non-existence is not punishment, it's simply non-existence.
Physical death is not the destruction we're talking about though, is it? We're talking about the final punishment of the wicked. The only way your argument can make sense is if you don't believe in a non-material soul that exists after physical death, in which case you then have other problems.I disagree. Being destroyed is a punishment. Ask anyone who has been destroyed! Or if the death penalty is not a punishment, why are mass murderers put to death as punishment?
Jesus said far more about hell than just that. You must take all into account, everything Jesus says, everything the rest of Scripture says. You cannot build a proper understanding of something based on one verse.Actually, it agrees with what Jesus said about hell. Read Matthew 10:28. Does it say we should fear the one who will torment both body and soul in Gehenna or does it say "destroy both body and soul in Gehenna".
It doesn't disagree with your interpretation of Scripture. Whether or not it doesn't actually disagree with Scripture remains to be seen.I like this statement of faith specifically because it doesn't disagree with any scripture at all.
Two main problems with such a position are:
1. It undermines most of what Jesus says about hell, and
2. Non-existence is not punishment, it's simply non-existence.
Jesus said far more about hell than just that. You must take all into account, everything Jesus says, everything the rest of Scripture says. You cannot build a proper understanding of something based on one verse.
What do you think Jesus meant by "destroy both soul and body in Hell"?It doesn't disagree with your interpretation of Scripture. Whether or not it doesn't actually disagree with Scripture remains to be seen.
And herein lies one of the main problems in discussions of biblical interpretation. People want to just pick a verse or two, or more, and pit them against other verses. But that simply is not how proper biblical interpretation is done. A proper understanding on any biblical subject must take into account all that Scripture states on that matter, and then provide a coherent understanding. Having said that, I believe there are problems with every position on hell that I know of.Why not pick your top two (or more) Scriptures that are Jesus teaching about lost people's final punishment (after their resurrection and judgment) that teach anything different than Matt 10:28 or Rev 21:8 does. Then we'll discuss (here in the A&T section) what Scriptures you speak of that are so counter to these.
Not me, not this "people". I was just lighting the request a little for you to back up your statement about Jesus' words concerning Hell and the "fate of the unsaved" with one or two Scriptures that have Jesus speaking about the fate of the un-saved in Hell in anyway other than He does in Matt 10:28 and Rev 21:8 (death of both the body and soul) concerning the "Fate of the un-saved".And herein lies one of the main problems. People want to just pick a verse or two, or more, and pit them against other verses.
I've pretty much read and studied all of what Jesus says about Hell. I was just wondering if I've missed one or two, because you sure sounded like you knew of some ("most", in fact) that would give an alternate or more "proper understanding of any biblical subject" and/or "coherent understanding" other than a "2nd death" awaits the un-saved in Hell.1. It undermines most of what Jesus says about hell,
No problem.I am not going to post anything on the matter as people need to do proper study. I am not going to do it for them.
As you say, that remains to be seen. Does Romans 6:23 say "Physical" Death, "Spiritual" Death, or just "Death"? It says "the wages of sin is death" so I believe that the wages of sin is death. If it meant eternal torment, it would have said eternal torment.Physical death is not the destruction we're talking about though, is it?
Absolutely!We're talking about the final punishment of the wicked.
Actually, "my" argument is that the Bible means what it says. If the soul survives death, then a contradiction arises within Scripture, because Ezekiel 18:4 says that the soul who sins shall die. If a soul can't die, then the scriptures are false. If the soul can die, then there is no problem with what I believe. Also if the soul is not destroyed in Gehenna, if it can't be, then Jesus wasn't telling us the truth when he said that we should fear the one who CAN destroy both body and soul in Gehenna.The only way your argument can make sense is if you don't believe in a non-material soul that exists after physical death, in which case you then have other problems.
This is not based on just one verse. I do take everything Jesus says into account. If Jesus ever said that the lost will be sent to Hell where they will be tormented alive forever, please let me know the chapter and verse. I don't believe He ever said that.Jesus said far more about hell than just that. You must take all into account, everything Jesus says, everything the rest of Scripture says. You cannot build a proper understanding of something based on one verse.
I know. It doesn't disagree with Scripture either. But if you wish to share your interpretation of scripture that you think disagrees with my SOF, let me know, we can talk.It doesn't disagree with your interpretation of Scripture.
Well, I've studied this thoroughly and it doesn't disagree with scripture. Whether or not you are able to come up with scripture that disagrees remains to be seen.Whether or not it doesn't actually disagree with Scripture remains to be seen.
I can post a lot more proof of my position than I have. For brevity's sake, I haven't posted all the research I have done. I have found that people don't read it anyway.And herein lies one of the main problems in discussions of biblical interpretation. People want to just pick a verse or two, or more, and pit them against other verses. But that simply is not how proper biblical interpretation is done. A proper understanding on any biblical subject must take into account all that Scripture states on that matter, and then provide a coherent understanding. Having said that, I believe there are problems with every position on hell that I know of.
I am not going to post anything on the matter as people need to do proper study. I am not going to do it for them.