Razeontherock
Member
- Feb 15, 2018
- 5,210
- 2,019
I have no agenda. Just trying to understand it. So went to the concordance (blb) and it was surprising to me that it said it is solid.
That's what we're supposed to do, right? Go back into the original language of the text to gain insight. And, yes, I agree, let's stick to the text of the scriptures.
So where is it saying that the waters above are clouds?
And why wouldn't it be solid as stated in the text?
Concordances (especially Strong's, which is primitive in terms of scholarship) lexicons and other study aids are helpful, but only bring us so far. It is no substitute for speaking the language. To see what I mean, just read the Amplified version. It spells out all the meanings of the words, only eliminating those that are grammatically impossible.
The resultant understanding is that we can't latch onto one possible meaning out of many, in this case "solid," and tell ourselves "that's the one!" There is no reason to think that one is what was intended, to the exclusion of all others. Hebrew just doesn't work that way. There is especially no reason to think that what was intended was a literal, one English word meaning; ancient Hebrew was figurative and symbolic.
There is every reason to take the intent of the text as pointing to God's supremacy, filling us with wonder, and encouraging us to learn. And learn we have! Ancient peoples did, too; but God didn't use Scripture to spell out scientific details for us. What kind of a parent spells out all the answers for their child? He gave us a brain, and encourages us to use it. Passages like this are part of that process. Most pioneers of science specifically credited God for their inspiration, while the discoveries were gained through experimentation and hard work.
I can envision God as puzzled that we haven't figured out gravity and how to manipulate it yet, sad that we still struggle with energy, and horrified at our misuse of atomic energy when we have so many ways of using it safely.