The Global Agenda: Operation Lockstep.

[Free]

7335 total deaths?

This is totally false and deceptively misleading.

385,676 in the US alone in 2020

463,267 deaths in the US in 2021


Why the misleading info Free?

How many lives were lost to COVID-19? A look back nearly 5 years later

Millions have died since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020.

www.newsweek.com

View attachment 21237

Now I know for a fact you’re not actually reading the article. Try reading it for once and tell me what you see. Be sure to read all the charts too.

 

[JLB]

Now I know for a fact you’re not actually reading the article. Try reading it for once and tell me what you see. Be sure to read all the charts too.

Here is what you wrote -

let's look at the other numbers provided in the article for the July, 2022 time period:

77% total vaxxed (incl. 52% vaxxed and boosted)
23% unvaxxed

7,335 total deaths
2,883 deaths - unvaxxed (39%)
1,664 deaths - vaxxed and boosted (23%)
2,788 deaths - vaxxed (38%)


As we all know there were hundreds of thousands of deaths in 2020 and in 2021 and even more in 2022.

As of today there are millions of people who died from Covid 19.

Most of which were vaccinated as you pointed out.

Then there are millions of people who received the vaccine and never got Covid, but died from Myocardial issues.


You like many others on the left have “closed your eyes” to the truth.




JLB

 

[Free]

Here is what you wrote -

let's look at the other numbers provided in the article for the July, 2022 time period:

77% total vaxxed (incl. 52% vaxxed and boosted)
23% unvaxxed

7,335 total deaths
2,883 deaths - unvaxxed (39%)
1,664 deaths - vaxxed and boosted (23%)
2,788 deaths - vaxxed (38%)


As we all know there were hundreds of thousands of deaths in 2020 and in 2021 and even more in 2022.

As of today there are millions of people who died from Covid 19.

Most of which were vaccinated as you pointed out.

Then there are millions of people who received the vaccine and never got Covid, but died from Myocardial issues.


You like many others on the left have “closed your eyes” to the truth.

Yes, I am very well aware of what I wrote. I also wrote that you clearly didn't read the article, and even when I pointed that out, you still didn't bother to read the article. When you're clearly in error, don't double down; it isn't a good look. If you actually read the article, particularly the charts like I suggested, you would see this:


Again, here is the link: https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/why-do-vaccinated-people-represent-most-covid-19-deaths-right-now/

First, read the title of Figure 3 and notice that it is "30 Jurisdictions In The U.S.". Second, notice that I selected "JUL 2022," to correspond with Figure 1, which you provided. Third, add up all the numbers and you'll find they sum to 7,355. Fourth, figure out the percentages for each group, as I did, and you'll see that they are exactly what is shown Figure 1, the figure that you provided.

You're the one who first brought up this article and the chart in Figure 1, which you clearly completely divorced from the context of the rest of the article as a proof-text for your position. In so doing, you ignored the rest of the article, both the data on which that chart is based, as well as pretty much everything the article states, including the conclusion. And that despite my posting the conclusion more than once. This is a prime example of have your eyes closed to the truth.

Again, from the article:

"Conclusion

It would be a misrepresentation of the finding to say it is evidence against vaccination. This finding actually underscores the importance of staying up-to-date on boosters."

You are so wrong on what this article is saying that you couldn't be wronger. lol Stop doubling down on your error and instead learn something and grow. Learn to actually read and take the time to understand what you're reading rather than simply pulling information completely out of context.

 

[JLB]

It would be a misrepresentation of the finding to say it is evidence against vaccination. This finding actually underscores the importance of staying up-to-date on boosters."

You are so wrong on what this article is saying that you couldn't be wronger. lol Stop doubling down on your error and instead learn something and grow. Learn to actually read and take the time to understand what you're reading rather than simply pulling information completely out of context.

Taken on the full scale of all the Covid deaths this study shows the percentage of Covid deaths was larger among the vaccinated.

Then when you take the data from all the “sudden deaths” from those who vaccinated by never caught Covid the percentage is much greater.

It’s reckless to persuade people to have such a dangerous vaccine that has killed millions.

 

[Free]

Taken on the full scale of all the Covid deaths this study shows the percentage of Covid deaths was larger among the vaccinated.

Then when you take the data from all the “sudden deaths” from those who vaccinated by never caught Covid the percentage is much greater.

It’s reckless to persuade people to have such a dangerous vaccine that has killed millions.

So, rather than just admit you're wrong, you throw out some red herrings.

 

[Free]

Free, have you seen this?

Interesting and worrying at the same time. It's not the same thing as being dumb; some school districts have done a dismal job of teaching kids to think mathematically. Worth a read.

No, I haven't seen that. It is now on my wish list though, thanks! Knowing how to think mathematically is so important.

 

[Barbarian]

Taken on the full scale of all the Covid deaths this study shows the percentage of Covid deaths was larger among the vaccinated.

Your own data says the opposite. It says that unvaccinated people were twice as likely to die of the disease than vaccinated people.

 

[JLB]

Your own data says the opposite. It says that unvaccinated people were twice as likely to die of the disease than vaccinated people.

Moderna Batch 2 - Defending The Republic

defendingtherepublic.org

Moderna - Defending The Republic

defendingtherepublic.org

Yet this did not stop those running these “studies” from concluding, despite the absence of evidence, that the Moderna vaccine was not related to these deaths. For example, a 56 year-old woman experienced “sudden death” 182 days after receiving the second Moderna dose. The cause of death was unknown, and no autopsy was conducted. It seems they purposely decided not to investigate suspicious deaths in case the Moderna vaccine might be the cause.

There were numerous examples of participants with post-vaccination Bell’s Palsy and Shingles (Herpes Zoster). One 44 year-old female had “left side facial paralysis” just eight days after the second dose. Numerous vaccinated participants saw the onset of Shingles less than 10 daysafter vaccination.

Other key observations during the Moderna “studies” involved serious adverse events for those in the vaccinated groups. A number of participants experienced: myocardial infarction (heart attack); pulmonary embolism; spontaneous abortion/miscarriage; transient ischemic attack (TIA); and lymphoma. Subsequent analyses of reports from the FDA VAERS database, the Department of Defense’s DMED database, and European regulators showed heightened rates of these illnesses following administration of the Moderna vaccine.

And similar to their treatment of deaths post-vaccination, the studies seemed predestined to conclude that these serious adverse events – many of them life-threatening – were not related to the Moderna vaccine. It didn’t matter whether the adverse event occurred within days of vaccination. This creates serious doubt concerning the safety of the Moderna vaccine and the FDA’s standards and approval of the Moderna vaccine.

As part of the FDA’s production, DTR also received the results of a study entitled “A GLP Intramuscular Combined Developmental and Perinatal/Postnatal Reproductive Toxicity Study of mRNA-1273 in Rats.” The objective of this study was to: “assess the potential effects of mRNA-1273, a vaccine development candidate against SARS-CoV-2 infection, when administered intramuscularly on Study Days 1 and 15 (28 and 14 days prior to mating, respectively) and Gestation Days 1 and 13 on fertility and pre and postnatal development in the pregnant and lactating female Sprague Dawley CD (Crl:CD[SD]) rat.”

The findings of this study are troubling: the mRNA vaccine altered the skeletal variations of the rat fetuses and the “female pregnancy index” of the vaccinated rats was significantly lower than the control group. (A summary of this study was previously reported; DTR, via its FOIA lawsuit, is providing the full study.)

Here are the study’s key findings and observations:

• “mRNA-1273-related common skeletal variations consisting of wavy ribs and increase nodules were observed. Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses in 4 litters for a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%. Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses. The fetal and litter incidence of wavy ribs exceeded the range observed historically at the Testing Facility (see Appendix 40, Historical Control Data) and the fetal and litter incidence of rib nodules was within the range.”
• “mRNA-1273-related, non-adverse effects were limited to increase in the number of fetuses with common skeletal variations of 1 or more rib nodules and 1 or more wavy ribs.”
• “The mean number of [reproductive] cycle lengths was statistically-significantly higher in the mRNA-1273 group as compared to the control group.”
• “Mating occurred in 95.5% of the rats in the control group and 88.6% of the rats in the mRNA-1273 group.”
• “The female pregnancy index (number of rats mating/number of rats in the group) was 93.2% and 84.1% in the control and mRNA-1273 groups, respectively.”
• “At scheduled euthanasia, 1 pup in the mRNA-1273 dose group was observed with bilateral, small, minimal renal papilla and another pup from the same litter was observed with left, small, moderate renal papilla. These findings were not considered related to mRNA-1273 because the observations occurred only in 2 pups from a single litter.”

Finally, the FOIA production included a 2017-2018 Moderna study (which was submitted as part of the Spikevax BLA) entitled “A Single Dose Intramuscular Injection Tissue Distribution Study of mRNA-1647 in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats.” (The mRNA-1647 vaccine was developed before Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.) The purpose of this study was to “to determine the tissue distribution of mRNA-1647, when given once by intramuscular injection to rats” and to determine the toxicokinetic characteristics of mRNA-1647.”

Testing revealed that “mRNA-1647 was detected in all of the analyzed tissues except for kidney” with elevated levels of mRNA-1647 found in the spleen and eye. Notably, mRNA-1647 was detected in the brain and heart (see charts below).

I suspect these findings and thousands more like them will be made public very soon.

 

[Barbarian]

Yet this did not stop those running these “studies” from concluding, despite the absence of evidence, that the Moderna vaccine was not related to these deaths. For example, a 56 year-old woman experienced “sudden death” 182 days after receiving the second Moderna dose. The cause of death was unknown, and no autopsy was conducted. It seems they purposely decided not to investigate suspicious deaths in case the Moderna vaccine might be the cause.

It was six months later, and you just assumed the vaccine did it? Do you see why people don't take anti-vaxxers seriously?

Other key observations during the Moderna “studies” involved serious adverse events for those in the vaccinated groups. A number of participants experienced: myocardial infarction (heart attack); pulmonary embolism;

Ironic that such events are much more common in infected people than those who received the vaccination. Avoiding the shot to avoid those things are like drinking a fifth of whiskey before driving because sober people sometimes have auto accidents. Like your data showing that unvaccinated people are twice as likely to die of COVID-19 as vaccinated people, what matters is the numbers.

Testing revealed that “mRNA-1647 was detected in all of the analyzed tissues except for kidney” with elevated levels of mRNA-1647 found in the spleen and eye.

Pretty much what one would expect when injecting into muscle. Blood would carry the vaccine to all parts of the body. The vaccine peaked between 2 and 24 hours after injection. Which is what you'd expect; mRNA is rapidly degraded by cells after linking to a ribosome. From the study they misled you about...

A Single Dose Intramuscular Injection Tissue Distribution Study of mRNA-1647 in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats
In conclusion, the administration of 100 μg mRNA-1647 by a single intramuscular injection to
male rats was clinically well-tolerated. Clinical signs were limited to firm swelling noted at the
injection site and correlated with macroscopic anatomical changes observed at the injection site
(swelling, firmness and/or dark foci) with secondary changes in the draining lymph nodes
(enlargement and/or dark foci). These changes were consistent with a local reaction to the
intramuscular injection of mRNA-1647 and were fully or partially resolved at the end of the
study. Concentrations of mRNA-1647 were quantifiable in the majority of tissues examined and
in plasma 2 hours postdose and peak concentrations were reached between 2 and 24 hours
postdose in tissues with exposures above that of plasma. The highest mRNA-1647 exposure was
observed in muscle (i.e. site of injection), followed by proximal (popliteal) lymph nodes, axillary
distal lymph nodes and spleen, suggesting the mRNA-1647 distribution to the circulation by
lymph flow. All other tissues tested, except for spleen (higher than plasma) and eye (slightly
higher than plasma), have demonstrated exposures comparable or below that measured in
plasma.

 

[hawkman]

Infants and children DO NOT need the co*id vaccine ! In A very , very few a case could be made I suppose but other than that , NO .

Doctor tells Tucker Carlson: CDC still promoting COVID shots for kids after 38,000 jab deaths - LifeSite

Dr. Bowden warned that we don’t know if babies are suffering the symptoms of heart inflammation, which is afflicting especially teenage boys who have received the COVID shot.

www.lifesitenews.com

Clip From the link .

For these reasons and more, the Florida Department of Health has actually recommended against COVID shots for children. “We’re kind of scraping at the bottom of the barrel, particularly with healthy kids, in terms of actually being able to quantify with any accuracy and any confidence the even potential of benefit,” Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, a Harvard University-trained doctor, said in 2022.

In fact, the shots are still under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) status for children under 12, according to Bowden. And yet the CDC has reported that nine million American children have received the latest version of these COVID shots.

Safety concerns for children are compounded by the fact that myocarditis, or heart inflammation, is a well-documented risk for young people who receive the mRNA COVID shots, especially teenage boys.

“That’s why we can’t let this just go away … We don’t know what that risk is for nonverbal babies, because the symptom is chest pain. So, a baby could be getting myocarditis and we have no idea,” Bowden told Carlson. “Myocarditis can leave a scar on the heart.”