OP The intermediate state - what can be reasonably inferred from scripture?
Between our physical death and the resurrection lies what is called the 'intermediate state.' I believe that there is sufficient evidence in scripture to support this.
The raising of Lazarus John 11:
11After he had said this, he went on to tell them, "Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep; but I am going there to wake him up."
12His disciples replied, "Lord, if he sleeps, he will get better." 13Jesus had been speaking of his death, but his disciples thought he meant natural sleep.
14So then he told them plainly, "Lazarus is dead, 15and for your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him."
The expressions ' Lazarus has fallen asleep' and 'Lazarus is dead' convey the same reality. 'Death' is decribed as being like 'natural sleep' and from the point of view of the living it is easy to imagine 'time' losing its significance. To us time keeps ticking away. Now what transpires from the 'moment of death' to the 'moment of resurrection' is what I call the intermediate state. I'm sure there are more formal definitions but this at least is a start.
Those who don't hold to the intermediate state are invited to bring there objections to this discussion.
blessings
Between our physical death and the resurrection lies what is called the 'intermediate state.' I believe that there is sufficient evidence in scripture to support this.
The raising of Lazarus John 11:
11After he had said this, he went on to tell them, "Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep; but I am going there to wake him up."
12His disciples replied, "Lord, if he sleeps, he will get better." 13Jesus had been speaking of his death, but his disciples thought he meant natural sleep.
14So then he told them plainly, "Lazarus is dead, 15and for your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him."
The expressions ' Lazarus has fallen asleep' and 'Lazarus is dead' convey the same reality. 'Death' is decribed as being like 'natural sleep' and from the point of view of the living it is easy to imagine 'time' losing its significance. To us time keeps ticking away. Now what transpires from the 'moment of death' to the 'moment of resurrection' is what I call the intermediate state. I'm sure there are more formal definitions but this at least is a start.
Those who don't hold to the intermediate state are invited to bring there objections to this discussion.
blessings