- Nov 23, 2012
- 15,017
- 4,990
I need more.The part that really emphasizes our greed is the longer a lottery continues without a winner, the larger the prize becomes and the more tickets are sold. One's odds of winning haven't changed a bit but with the bigger prize people are willing to spend more to have that shot.
Here's the kicker. Most of the larger lotteries begin with a substantial prize in the millions so why is winning even more such a high draw? For example, the Powerball lottery starts out at $40,000,000.00. Even after taxes, the remaining monies would be more than enough for the winner to be financially independent and then some. What difference does it make if the winning prize goes even higher?
A person winning a $40,000,000.00 prize could retire immediately at any age, never use the base amount of their funds, and still confidently have approximately $1,200,000.00 per year salary. Check it out.
The highest federal tax bracket is 39.6%. The highest MN tax bracket is 9.85%. Not accurate but assuming the final taxable income for that winning year is the $40M, the total tax liability would be approximately 49.45% leaving the winner with approximately $20,220,000.00. Even at the least conservative estimate, it should not be much of a problem to invest that money and get an average return of over 6% annually. I would expect 8% to be attainable with reasonably minimal risk.
$20,220,000.00 x .06 = $1,213,200.00 annual return on the investment. Here in MN, a middle class income is considered to be $60,000.00 - $70,000.00 per year. Using the $70,000.00 figure, the $1,213,200.00 is enough to supply 17 middle income salaries.
How much more does one need??
Of course, this is all assuming the winner doesn't spend about half of the money defending against the flood of frivolous lawsuits aimed to get their piece of the pie.
That's my human nature.