The Number of the Beast Finally Revealed!

[BCHYH]

This shows through scripture what the Number of the Beast actually is:

 

[for_his_glory]

BTW, I am going to move this over to the End Times forum for further discussion.

 

[for_his_glory]

This Jesuit stuff is just complete anti-Catholic garbage and has no place on a discussion forum like this.
Jesuits do not control the world
There is no Jesuit Blood Oath. That's fiction.

I'm really amazed (though perhaps I shouldn't be) that this sort of rubbish is allowed on a site like this.

From the Terms of Service
Christianforums.net aspires to provide a place where Christians can fellowship for encouragement, inspiration, and strength to help build each other up and grow in our walk of faith through honest and open discussion, study, reflection, and prayer.

Our aim is to speak freely about theology and biblical concepts and the understanding of scripture but in an atmosphere of mutual respect and love for our brothers and sisters in Christ.; Our forum is open to all those who would desire to have discussions that would follow our aspirations.

And A MODERATOR posted it!!!!!!!!

I deleted my comments as people refuse to believe that which has already been written in the scriptures, history and future events. This is always a sticky subject and it's a shame we can not discuss such things with others thinking we are bashing Catholics.

This has nothing to do with bashing Catholics or the Catholic Church in general as many Catholics enjoy the structure and discipline of the church service and are Spiritually born again from above Christians. This is a study of Daniel chapter 2, 7 and 9 and about the ten nations Daniel describes that will rule all nations in the end of days that Christ will come back and destroy.

It's always those who have no understanding as they do not dig the deeper things of the word of God that will be caught off guard when all this comes to fruition in the end of days.

 

[Mungo]

I deleted my comments as people refuse to believe that which has already been written in the scriptures, history and future events. This is always a sticky subject and it's a shame we can not discuss such things with others thinking we are bashing Catholics.

This has nothing to do with bashing Catholics or the Catholic Church in general as many Catholics enjoy the structure and discipline of the church service and are Spiritually born again from above Christians. This is a study of Daniel chapter 2, 7 and 9 and about the ten nations Daniel describes that will rule all nations in the end of days that Christ will come back and destroy.

It's always those who have no understanding as they do not dig the deeper things of the word of God that will be caught off guard when all this comes to fruition in the end of days.

Thank you. Please delete my response as it contains your post.
I would however like to make a point about the "Jesuit Oath" and it's inclusion in the Congressional Record
The “Jesuit Oath” is a fabrication with no factual basis. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia this oath was the product of the imagination of the forger Robert Ware (mid to late 1600’s).

Here’s an excerpt from the Catholic Encyclopedia article “Impostors”:
"Robert Ware the forger, the author of "Foxes and Firebrands", who has of late years been so thoroughly exposed by Father Bridgett, traded upon the same prejudices. His more public career began contemporaneously with that of Oates in 1678, and by sheltering himself behind the high reputation of his dead father, Sir James Ware, amongst whose manuscripts he pretended to discover all kinds of compromising papers, he obtained currency for his forgeries, remaining almost undetected until modern times. Many foul aspersions upon the character of individual popes, Jesuits, and other Catholics, and also upon some Puritans, which have found their way into the pages of respectable historians, are due to the fabrications of "this literary skunk", as Fr. Bridgett not unjustifiably calls him (see Bridgett, "Blunders and Forgeries", pp. 209-296).

As to its insertion into the Library of Congress, anyone can put any junk into library on completion of Form TX and a $30 fee.

Form FL 109 explains:
COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION OF BOOKS, MANUSCRIPTS, AND SPEECHES
A published or unpublished book or manuscript may be submitted for registration in the Copyright Office. Form TX should be used to apply for copyright registration for textual works, with or without illustrations. Form TX is appropriate for registration of nondramatic literary works including: fiction, nonfiction, poetry, contributions to collective works, compilations, directories, catalogs, dissertations, theses, reports, speeches, bound or looseleaf volumes, pamphlets, brochures, and single pages containing text. There is no specific requirement as to the printing, binding, format, or paper size and quality of unpublished manuscript material. Typewritten, photocopied, and legibly handwritten manuscripts, preferably in ink, are all acceptable for deposit.

(my emboldening in both quotes)

I think Form TX is being phased out and the registration fee has gone up since the web site I got this information from published it but the point is any fictional junk can be registered. It says nothing about its authenticity.

 

[for_his_glory]

I deleted your reply, but will leave you with this below. I will not discuss this anymore with you as when one has no understanding one will only see it as Catholic bashing, which it is not. It takes the combination of history, archeology and what is clearly written in the scriptures to understand the end time events.

Anyone can looked up the journals online as you can read the full oath: The JESUIT Extreme Oath of Induction recorded in the Journals of the 62D Congress, 3d Session of the U.S. (House Calendar No. 397. Report No. 1523) Congressional Record House, 15 Feb. 1913, pp3215-3216:

 

[gaviria.christian]

This shows through scripture what the Number of the Beast actually is:

All symbols in the book of Revelation are based on the Tanakh. If you know the Tanakh you know everything. Therefore 666 relates to this passage in the Tanakh,

Now the weight of gold that came to Solomon in one year was 666 talents of gold,
1 Kings 10:14

Why gold you might ask? Well, my diagram will explain it, and what the true mark of the beast is. After looking at my diagram, then Google the following exact phrase to read the bible study regarding this topic "identity mark of the beast 666 wisdomofgod".

 

[for_his_glory]

If people only knew the truth of this old world order that received a deadly wound that has been healed and risen to become the revived New World Order Luciferian system of political, economic, military, educational and false religious power they would understand who the beast out of the sea is who gives power to the beast out of the earth in Rev 13. It's the same system that crucified Christ.

Unfortunately it comes against the ToS, but yet thoroughly found in the scriptures. To each their own studies.

 

[Mungo]

I deleted your reply, but will leave you with this below. I will not discuss this anymore with you as when one has no understanding one will only see it as Catholic bashing, which it is not. It takes the combination of history, archeology and what is clearly written in the scriptures to understand the end time events.

Anyone can looked up the journals online as you can read the full oath: The JESUIT Extreme Oath of Induction recorded in the Journals of the 62D Congress, 3d Session of the U.S. (House Calendar No. 397. Report No. 1523) Congressional Record House, 15 Feb. 1913, pp3215-3216:

I have been doing more research on this and the Oath is a fabrication.
I quote from http://www.evangelizationstation.com/htm_html/Anti-Catholicism/jesuit_oath_debunked.htm

The oath in question in the Bonniwell vs Butler case was another (similar) fabrication called “Knights of Columbus Oath”. The Jesuits were not mentioned.

It was in the Congressional record because it was part of the documents submitted during the hearing. It was in a document circulated anonymously during a heated election campaign.

Both sides repudiated its authenticity. It was included in a House Report summarizing an investigation of that election, because it was attached to a document submitted by one of the candidates.

The following statement was made by Thomas Butler on behalf of whose campaign someone circulated it.
I have no knowledge of “any man, set of men, political organization, or its representative, employing or procuring messengers to traverse this congressional district and to circulate on my account or on any account the publication which you characterize as a blasphemous and infamous libel, known as Knights of Columbus oath.” That this paper was circulated through this congressional district during this campaign I both admit and regret. I deny that I had anything whatever to do, directly or indirectly, with either its publication or its circulation. It came into this district though the mails, I am informed, and as fast as it appeared those who took my advice destroyed it. I am advised by those who know, that the same article was circulated and distributed in other parts of Pennsylvania than this congressional district during the last campaign, and I am further informed that this same article has been circulated not only in Pennsylvania, but in other States during political campaigns for many years. I had no knowledge whatever of it until it appeared here during the last campaign, and from a source I know nothing about. Two or three of my political advocates showed me copies of this paper, which they had received through the mails. I requested them to ascertain where other copies of it had been received and to have all of them destroyed. I apprehended with alarm the use of such a document in a political campaign, or at any other time.

I do not believe in its truthfulness, and so stated my judgment concerning it on November 4, 1912 (as soon as complaint was made to me of its general circulation), through the columns of the West Chester Daily Local News . . .

No sane person could conclude that this constitutes any sort of "authentication" of this document by Congress.

I think that this, without a doubt shows that neither Oath is credible, and allow me to point out that even Congress believes this to be so, because in the Congressional Record, the Committee on Elections states the following:

This committee cannot condemn too strongly the publication of the false and libelous article referred to in the paper of Mr. Bonniwell, and which was the spurious Knights of Columbus oath, a copy of which is appended to the paper. (H.R. Rep. No. 62-1523 (1913), reprinted in the Congressional Record for February 15, 1913, at p. 3221)

All of which leaves me with only one last thing to say:

You shall not utter a false report. (Exodus 23:1 [RSV])

 

[for_his_glory]

I have been doing more research on this and the Oath is a fabrication.
I quote from http://www.evangelizationstation.com/htm_html/Anti-Catholicism/jesuit_oath_debunked.htm

The oath in question in the Bonniwell vs Butler case was another (similar) fabrication called “Knights of Columbus Oath”. The Jesuits were not mentioned.

It was in the Congressional record because it was part of the documents submitted during the hearing. It was in a document circulated anonymously during a heated election campaign.

Both sides repudiated its authenticity. It was included in a House Report summarizing an investigation of that election, because it was attached to a document submitted by one of the candidates.

The following statement was made by Thomas Butler on behalf of whose campaign someone circulated it.
I have no knowledge of “any man, set of men, political organization, or its representative, employing or procuring messengers to traverse this congressional district and to circulate on my account or on any account the publication which you characterize as a blasphemous and infamous libel, known as Knights of Columbus oath.” That this paper was circulated through this congressional district during this campaign I both admit and regret. I deny that I had anything whatever to do, directly or indirectly, with either its publication or its circulation. It came into this district though the mails, I am informed, and as fast as it appeared those who took my advice destroyed it. I am advised by those who know, that the same article was circulated and distributed in other parts of Pennsylvania than this congressional district during the last campaign, and I am further informed that this same article has been circulated not only in Pennsylvania, but in other States during political campaigns for many years. I had no knowledge whatever of it until it appeared here during the last campaign, and from a source I know nothing about. Two or three of my political advocates showed me copies of this paper, which they had received through the mails. I requested them to ascertain where other copies of it had been received and to have all of them destroyed. I apprehended with alarm the use of such a document in a political campaign, or at any other time.

I do not believe in its truthfulness, and so stated my judgment concerning it on November 4, 1912 (as soon as complaint was made to me of its general circulation), through the columns of the West Chester Daily Local News . . .

No sane person could conclude that this constitutes any sort of "authentication" of this document by Congress.

I think that this, without a doubt shows that neither Oath is credible, and allow me to point out that even Congress believes this to be so, because in the Congressional Record, the Committee on Elections states the following:

This committee cannot condemn too strongly the publication of the false and libelous article referred to in the paper of Mr. Bonniwell, and which was the spurious Knights of Columbus oath, a copy of which is appended to the paper. (H.R. Rep. No. 62-1523 (1913), reprinted in the Congressional Record for February 15, 1913, at p. 3221)

All of which leaves me with only one last thing to say:

You shall not utter a false report. (Exodus 23:1 [RSV])

You can believe what you want, but I got this and many things first hand from a friend of mine many years ago that was inducted into the Jesuit Priesthood as he explained the whole ceremony to me in a letter. After seeing the Satanic things that were performed and carried out he left the priesthood and became a whistle blower to all their deception. So no, it is not a false report, but hidden from the eyes of the public that have no knowledge of these things.