Re: Jesus worshipped the Father as King of the Universe.So did disciples.so should we
Please let me clarify that I was talking about a Jewish or a Christian trinity. I'm sure the disciples knew about the pagan trinities.
I knew what you were talking about which is why I gave the answer I did.
But did Jesus ever teach them that a trinity three in one God ruled the universe? No He never did. He always taught that a single individual being that He claimed was His Father was the single supreme ruler of the universe.
Remember the Lord's Prayer? The Father's will be done in heaven and earth.
Remember Jesus parables where He talks about the King and His Son. The Universe is a monarchy and God the Father is the King.
And yet Jesus claimed equality with the Father, he implicitly claimed to be God.
Trinitarians teaching that there is a three in one commity named the trinity that have equal authority is total contrary to Jesus teaching.
We'll get to that. There are some things that need to be clarified, which I will do in the post that follows.
Jesus preexisted the creation of time because Jesus created time along with everything else that was created.
If Jesus created time, then he himself was not created, as several passages show. As soon as something is created, time begins.
I asked you in my last reply to you to make a simple comparison between the Apostle Paul's statement of faith 1st Corinthians 8:6 But for us there is One God, the Father and One Lord Jesus Christ vs a trinitarians statement of faith I believe in One God the Father,Son, and Holyspirit.
Your Trinity God and Pauls God in 1st Corin 8:6 are totally oppisite from eachother but you keep ignoring this fact and skipping over this Bible verse altogether. In your next reply please respond that you have read 1st Corin 8:6 and please comment on this verse.
I will comment and note that this ends up being the problem with this discussion--it ends up being a fruitless exercise in proof-texting which generally leads nowhere. Now, certainly Scripture must back up what is said, but
the sum of the parts must be in agreement with the whole. And I maintain, that the doctrine of the Trinity is the
only doctrine of God where this is the case. Your case has already fallen apart because the parts, the proof-texts you have given, do not make sense of the whole, there is no agreement there. I will show this to be the case as we progress.
Let's look at 1 Cor 8:6:
1Co 8:6 yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist. (ESV)
Firstly, if we understand this to say that only the Father is God, then it follows that the Father cannot be Lord. Secondly, if we understand that "from whom are all things" speaks of the eternal preexistence of God, then it follows that "through whom are all things" speaks of the eternal preexistence of Jesus. Thirdly, in context, Paul is speaking of the many "so-called gods" and lords:
1Co 8:5 For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many "gods" and many "lords"— (ESV)
I believe this is Paul expanding on the Jewish Shema in Deut 6:4:
Deu 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. (ESV)
The Shema is a call to the monotheism of Judaism--a central doctrine of Christianity as well which contradicts your position--and here in 1 Cor 8:6 Paul is also making a claim to monotheism, that the one true God is the only God.
Because you keep making the statement that the trinity is biblical so when someone shows you some verses that don't agree with your statement please just don't ignore these verses.
Paul said faith comes by hearing the word of God. He didn't say that faith comes by ignoring it.
I'm not ignoring anything. I simply didn't have the time to address them. However, none of them disagree with the Trinity. If you think they do, then you really don't understand the doctrine of the Trinity, which is perhaps why you disagree with it.
You quoted me making a biblical statement that God the Father is the One God of all and that all that He is God over includes Jesus Christ and your response.
I never said that there is only one God. One God gave birth to a Divine Son. That makes two Gods. One God can't be seen because He dwells behind the light no man can approach unto. But the other God was seen by Abraham wresteled with Jacob and was seen by Moses and walked and talked to Adam and Eve after they sinned. One God only hath immortality but the other one emptied Himself from His immortality so that He could be incarnated as a mortal man and actually die ceasing to be consious for three days. One God can't be tempted but the other one emptied himself of His divine powers so that He could be tempted in all points just like we are so that He could help us and be our Comforter.
Please listen carefully. I didn't say that there was only One God. I said that there is only One God of all.
And there you have it. You have denied a fundamental and central doctrine of both Judaism and Christianity, monotheism. You are a polytheist and that goes against Scripture (all from the ESV):
Isa 43:10-11, 10 "You are my witnesses," declares the LORD, "and my servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he.
Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me. 11 I, I am the LORD, and besides me there is no savior.
Isa 44:6-8, 6 Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: "
I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god. 7 Who is like me? Let him proclaim it. Let him declare and set it before me, since I appointed an ancient people. Let them declare what is to come, and what will happen. 8 Fear not, nor be afraid; have I not told you from of old and declared it? And you are my witnesses!
Is there a God besides me? There is no Rock; I know not any."
Isa 45:18 For thus says the LORD, who created the heavens (he is God!), who formed the earth and made it (he established it; he did not create it empty, he formed it to be inhabited!): "I am the LORD, and
there is no other.
Isa 45:21 Declare and present your case; let them take counsel together! Who told this long ago? Who declared it of old? Was it not I, the LORD? And
there is no other god besides me, a righteous God and a Savior;
there is none besides me.
Isaiah 46:9 remember the former things of old; for
I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me,
You say there are two Gods but the Bible says there is only one.
The Divine Son of the Father might be God of all created beings. But He is not His own God.
Of course not. The Father isn't is own God either.
God the Father is the One God of all.
"one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all.""Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ..."Ephesians 4:6 and Ephesians 1:3
Saying that the Father is alone as the One God of all including God of Jesus Christ is completely biblical as I have just proven with these 2 verses in Ephesians.
But you divorcing these passages from the rest of Scripture, hence the main problem with proof-texting.
You asked an interesting question. Why is God the Father called God the Father?
It's because He is the Originator of everything. He gave birth to a Son. His Son created everything that is created.
But for us, "There is only one God, the Father. Everything came from him, and we live for him. There is only one Lord, Jesus Christ. Everything came into being through him, and we live because of him."1st Corinthians 8:6 God's word translation 1995
Well you seem to have shot yourself in the foot. You bolded and underlined "
Everything came from him," as proof that the Father is "the Originator of everything," but for to do the same for the Son, "
Everything came into being through him." You even go so far as to state "His Son created everything that is created."
This is the dilemma for your position: If the Son created everything that is created, which you and I are both in agreement on, then it logically follows that the Son himself
cannot be created or that statement is false.
You quoted me saying that God the Father gave birth to an equally Divine Son and your response
I never said that Jesus was created. I said that He was born from the Father. He inherited His Father's Divine and uncreated nature so He is as much Divine and the Father is Divine and equal to Him just like you are as much human as your parents are human.
If the Father "gave birth" to the Son, the Son is created. "Uncreated nature" cannot be inherited, that is nonsense. How can something that did not exist at one point inherit a nature which has always existed? Something that has an uncreated nature has, by definition, always existed.
And here we have another contradiction in your position. You previously stated: "Trinitarians teaching that there is a three in one commity named the trinity
that have equal authority is total contrary to Jesus teaching." But you just stated above: "He is as much Divine and the Father is Divine and
equal to Him."
Is the Son equal to the Father or not?
It is impossible for God to lie but trinitarians make God a liar with their doctrine.
Be careful with such accusations. It could very well be your position that is the false one.
He said He has a Son and Son means child of a parent. Meaning the Father is older than the Son and that they are related and that God is the one who gave birth to His Son.
But trinitarians say that Son is only a title and they say that he was never born from the Father and that they are not different ages and they are not related but they always existed with eachother and they were just playing a role.
I'd rather believe God the Father's statement that Jesus is His actual Son than believe your man made trinitarian doctrine that says that the preincarnate Christ was never born from His Father.
Where in the Bible does it say that the Father "decided to give birth to a Son and it was done"? You need to provide proof or it may be your doctrine that is man-made.