The Pope as the Antichrist

  • CFN has a new look, using the Eagle as our theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • CFN welcomes a new contributing member!

    Please welcome Beetow to our Christian community.

    Blessings in Christ, and we pray you enjoy being a member here

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

This is a rumor.

Other angels oppose God under the leadership of Satan (Isaiah 14:12-20) whom even Satan is a created spirit of God that is why God could never destroy him because a spirit can not die. (Matthew 25:41; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 1: 6;Ephesians 6:12). We often call these types of angels demons for which an everlasting fire is prepared by God for these angels.

Angels are essentially “ministering spirits,” (Hebrews 1:14) and do not have physical bodies like humans. Jesus declared that “a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have” (Luke 24:37-39).

Angels have no gender (Matthew 22:30) and are innumerable (Hebrews 12:22). They are incarnate in human form at times (Genesis 18:2-8) for the purpose of ministry. Angels also express emotions (Luke 15:10), are wise (2 Samuel 14:20) and powerful (Psalms 103:20).

Other angels oppose God under the leadership of Satan (Isaiah 14:12-20) whom even Satan is a created spirit of God that is why God could never destroy him because a spirit can not die. (Matthew 25:41; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 1: 6;Ephesians 6:12). We often call these types of angels demons for which an everlasting fire is prepared by God for these angels.

It has always been Satan that works through others as the last time will be through the son of perdition/last antichrist.
2Thessalonians 2:1-12
 
The Protestant churches today and even some brethren are backing away from identifying the Antichrist
Did you ever see or play the game where a mole pops up and the goal is to hit the mole back into the hole with a mallet ?
 
Jesus was described as a man
Angels are described as a man
Fallen angels are described as a man
Gabriel his name (man of God)

So it really surprises me that everybody seems to think the antichrist is going to be a man
When in fact, I believe it will be Satan in person

Satan will be supernatural and so will his fallen angels (the Locust Army)

If he was a man, we would be able to spot it as he would slowly, but surely rise to the top similar to what Trump is doing

However, if he is Satan a Cherub he can just show up and imitate Jesus out of the blue. Come down on a white horse. Most people won’t even see it coming.
The whole world would worship him as the Bible clearly states

Logically speaking, I think a man possessed by Satan doesn’t fly.
He is the one behind it, but uses men who do his bidding and they are willing as we see..
 
The Protestant churches today and even some brethren are backing away from identifying the Antichrist power, and yet the Reformers and even those before them saw clearly who the Antichrist was. What is happening to the churches today, are they becoming blind and forgetful of the truth they once saw clearly, as to who was the leader of the Antichrist entity, and gave scriptural proof.

Here is good description of Martin Luther's conviction on this...
"Luther came to think of the pope as the Antichrist because, first, of what the general tradition was about where to find the Antichrist. The Antichrist was someone subverting the Church from within. That was the expectation popularly. And when he saw the papal office and read the histories and saw it subverting the gospel as he understood it, he became convinced that that was the proof that the papal office was the office of the Antichrist, trying to destroy God's church from within.

The pope claimed to be Christ's representative on earth. Luther became convinced that the pope was the devil's representative on earth. And that took graphic form very early in the Reformation ... with one of the most effective pieces of propaganda in the early Reformation: a series of 26 woodcuts that juxtaposed some action in Christ's life with something in the papacy. Christ carrying his cross to be crucified; the pope being carried in his throne on the backs of people ... . Christ washing the feet of the disciples; the pope having his feet kissed. And over and over again, scenes from Christ's life juxtaposed with scenes from the papacy. ... Christ was always humble and serving; the papacy, the pope was always lordly and [lording] over others. Christ is Christ; the pope is Antichrist.

At the end of his life, Martin Luther decided he had to issue his final testament against all the enemies of the gospel. And he published treatises, he encouraged people, but words were not sufficient. He also had to use images. And so he asked his friend, the painter Lucas Cranach, to do a series of woodcuts, and Luther wrote the verses for them. And these woodcuts were designed to show as graphically as possible, to those who could read and those who couldn't, what Luther thought of the papacy. So for example, there's a woodcut which shows the pope on his throne and peasants with their tongues out, their trousers down, farting in the pope's face. Another one shows the pope riding an ass, holding a pile of dung in his hands, saying "The pope is offering a counsel." And another that shows the German emperor lying on the ground with the pope with his foot on the emperor's neck, which shows, once again graphically, Luther's belief that the papacy was trying to control secular authority throughout the world. These were all actions of the Antichrist, and Luther wanted to make it clear what he thought of the pope".... Apocalypticism Explained | Apocalypse! FRONTLINE | PBS


The title of the Pope, 'Pontifex Maximus', can be traced all the way back to ancient Babylon and its system of pagan worship. The Babylon kings served as both king and priest of the pagan Babylonian Mystery religion. As priests, they bore the title "Pontifex Maximus" or "Supreme Pontiff," meaning "supreme pathfinder" or "bridge maker," representing "the path or connection between this life and the next", or they held the keys to the next life. When Medo-Persia conquered Babylon, the Babylonian pagan religion was maintained, but there was a revolt of the priesthood so consequently the priests of Babylon were driven out of Medo-Persia, and established themselves at Pergamum, does the name sound familiar. Well they took with them their titles and vestures and set about to continued their reign there as priest-kings of Babylonian paganism and we find the scripture refers to it:

Revelation 2:12-14 King James Version (KJV)
12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges;
13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan's seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.
14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

The pontiff king of Pergamum Attalus III lived from 170 BC – 133 BC, and in his will he left the kingdom to the emperor of Rome in 133 BC and the kingdom of Pergamum merged with the Roman Empire along with what the Bible calls Satan throne and idol worship and its title "Pontifex Maximus".

The pagan title was taken over by the bishop of Rome, as we see it in In Emperor Theodosius's edict De fide catholica of 380 AD. By this time, the Roman bishops had amassed much political as well as religious power, and so the bishop of Rome was elected 'Pontifex Maximus', becoming the official pagan Babylonian priest seated on Satan's throne in Rome. As such, the bishop introduced the worship of pagan Babylon with its rites and rituals and pagan sacraments, "converted" the pagan temples of Rome into "Christian churches" but at the same time allowed pagan worship to come in.

The Roman bishop Damasus exercised his authority as head of 'Babylonian paganism in Rome', and replaced all the Christian elders with pagan priests and continued the practice of basically the Babylonian Mystery religion and we can see how it spread in Roman Empire from there, and was pointed out by the Reformation and its leaders and nothing has changed.
How did they see clearly? I thought the sola’s require that “sacred scripture is the only infallible authority”???

Now they are seers and visionaries?

Where does scripture say this?
 
How did they see clearly? I thought the sola’s require that “sacred scripture is the only infallible authority”???

Now they are seers and visionaries?

Where does scripture say this?
Even the Catholics admit it..
"Thus the Lutheran Book of Concord states, “[T]he pope is the real Antichrist who has raised himself over and set himself against Christ . . . Accordingly, just as we cannot adore the devil himself as our lord or God, so we cannot suffer his apostle, the pope or Antichrist, to govern us as our head or lord” (Smalcald Articles 2:4:10, 14).

The Presbyterian and Anglican Westminster Confession states, “There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ; nor can the pope of Rome in any sense be the head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and that son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the church against Christ, and all that is called God” (25:6)."
 
If the pope is not 'the' antichrist, then it is something else,
as noted by Martin Luther, Keith Green, Charles Chiniquoy, perhaps a thousand other priests, Watchman Nee, and Jesus Himself.
This "pope = the Antichrist" idea was an essential part of the anti-Cathlotic narrative during the Tudor and the Stuart period, the primary goal of the reformation was to claim independence from Rome and establish the church of England, aka the Anglican church; the alternative of pledging allegiance to the pope was not to Christ, but to the monarch of England. Religion was just a facade of an intense power struggle between the Protestants and the Catholics, started with Henry VIII's divorce and lasted over the entire Stuart period, dragged the entire nation into a series of bloody civil wars. Sardis, the fifth church among the seven churches in Revelation, is known as the "dead church", that's the one associated with the Reformation. It has a big name, but overall it was political in nanture, very similar to the conflict between the Brexiteers and the Remainers during the Brexit movement, or the nationalists and globalists in America.
 
Even the Catholics admit it..
"Thus the Lutheran Book of Concord states, “[T]he pope is the real Antichrist who has raised himself over and set himself against Christ . . . Accordingly, just as we cannot adore the devil himself as our lord or God, so we cannot suffer his apostle, the pope or Antichrist, to govern us as our head or lord” (Smalcald Articles 2:4:10, 14).

The Presbyterian and Anglican Westminster Confession states, “There is no other head of the church but the Lord Jesus Christ; nor can the pope of Rome in any sense be the head thereof; but is that Antichrist, that man of sin, and that son of perdition, that exalteth himself in the church against Christ, and all that is called God” (25:6)."
But scripture says Christ appointed the popes!

Isa 22:21-22
Father
Keys
Matt 16:18-19
Peter is blessed
Has the keys of jurisdictional authority under Christ to administer the kingdom

No king administers his own kingdom
He always appoints a prime minister and cabinet

Peter and the apostles and their successors

God chose Peter acts 15:7

When Attila the hun was conquering Italy and came to Rome only one man dared oppose him, a frail old man named Pope Leo the great and seeing the power of God and the angels of God Attila fled in terror never to be seen again!

Christ and his church are one!
Peter and his successor is the visible head of the church the vicar of Christ as Christ established!

Thks
 
But scripture says Christ appointed the popes!

Isa 22:21-22
Father
Keys
Matt 16:18-19
Peter is blessed
Hey donadams I'm just curious how you come to the conclusion that "Scripture says Christ appointed the popes", from this:
Isa 22:21-22
Father
Keys
Matt 16:18-19
Peter is blessed

The passage in Isaiah says:
I will clothe him with your robe and fasten your sash around him and hand your authority over to him. He will be a father to those who live in Jerusalem and to the people of Judah. I will place on his shoulder the key to the house of David; what he opens no one can shut, and what he shuts no one can open.

How the word 'Father' infers that Jesus appointed the popes, is beyond me. You mention 'popes'. Is it your belief that he is still appointing each pope and also appointed all of the previous popes? Jesus appointed all of those guys? Some who were quite wicked. Much like many kings of Israel. God didn't appoint them either. In fact, He and His Son quite often rebuked the leaders of Israel. Saul didn't follow in the ways of God and God had him removed. Ahab did great wickedness before the Lord, God. Most of the kings merely ascended to the throne from familial patriarchy. Rehoboam was the son of Solomon who was the son of David. Not all, of course. Some were chosen by the people.

I suppose by keys to the kingdom you believe that Jesus was giving authority to the Catholic organization, and that authority came from those keys directly through the apostles to the popes. Which you believe to be supported by the passage of Matthew. Ok. Yes, Peter was blessed to have known and lived and shared with the Lord and to be assured of his salvation. As was Mary.

God bless,
Ted
 
Hey donadams I'm just curious how you come to the conclusion that "Scripture says Christ appointed the popes", from this:
Isa 22:21-22
Father
Keys
Matt 16:18-19
Peter is blessed

The passage in Isaiah says:
I will clothe him with your robe and fasten your sash around him and hand your authority over to him. He will be a father to those who live in Jerusalem and to the people of Judah. I will place on his shoulder the key to the house of David; what he opens no one can shut, and what he shuts no one can open.

How the word 'Father' infers that Jesus appointed the popes, is beyond me. You mention 'popes'. Is it your belief that he is still appointing each pope and also appointed all of the previous popes? Jesus appointed all of those guys? Some who were quite wicked. Much like many kings of Israel. God didn't appoint them either. In fact, He and His Son quite often rebuked the leaders of Israel. Saul didn't follow in the ways of God and God had him removed. Ahab did great wickedness before the Lord, God. Most of the kings merely ascended to the throne from familial patriarchy. Rehoboam was the son of Solomon who was the son of David. Not all, of course. Some were chosen by the people.

I suppose by keys to the kingdom you believe that Jesus was giving authority to the Catholic organization, and that authority came from those keys directly through the apostles to the popes. Which you believe to be supported by the passage of Matthew. Ok. Yes, Peter was blessed to have known and lived and shared with the Lord and to be assured of his salvation. As was Mary.

God bless,
Ted
Pope papa father!
Key and Jesus gave Peter’s person the keys of jurisdictional authority

Personal sin does not negate the office of apostle
They are still apostles no matter how regrettable their sun may be, Judas for example acts 1:17

They are apostles and called to be saints of God but like all men they are not impeccable

Before the apostles had this kingdom authority it was in the possession of successors of Moses in Matt 23 and Christ said they must be obeyed even though he had much to say about their behavior.

Christ is king
And no king administers his own kingdom but appoints a prime minister (Peter) and ministers (apostles) all verified by many other scriptures

Thanks
 
This "pope = the Antichrist" idea was an essential part of the anti-Cathlotic narrative during the Tudor and the Stuart period, the primary goal of the reformation was to claim independence from Rome and establish the church of England, aka the Anglican church; the alternative of pledging allegiance to the pope was not to Christ, but to the monarch of England. Religion was just a facade of an intense power struggle between the Protestants and the Catholics, started with Henry VIII's divorce and lasted over the entire Stuart period, dragged the entire nation into a series of bloody civil wars. Sardis, the fifth church among the seven churches in Revelation, is known as the "dead church", that's the one associated with the Reformation. It has a big name, but overall it was political in nanture, very similar to the conflict between the Brexiteers and the Remainers during the Brexit movement, or the nationalists and globalists in America.
I don't think Luther or Calvin were trying to establish the Church of England in any way...
 
You also have a false prophet who acts on behalf of the beast. A man.

The beast is identified as the angel of the abyss. A fallen angel as God does not imprison those who remain faithful to Him. Satan is given the keys to the abyss and releases the angel who is currently bound in the abyss in the days of the sounding of the 5th trumpet. Satan gives this beast his authority. This beast is behind the successful attack and murder of God's two witnesses as testified in Rev 11:7 when no one else could overpower them. This adds to the powerful delusion and lie that enters the world at that time. The world will state who can make war with the beast and stand against it. Those who love evil and refuse to repent of their evil ways and refuse to believe Gods testimony will fall to the lie of the beast so as to be condemned.

But after the 42 months of reign the beasts reign will come to a sudden end as God cut short those days of great tribulation.

But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur.
 
I think it's possible a future Pope be the Antichrist, but unlikely.

The "Man of Sin, Son of Perdition" Antichrist must fulfill prophecy no pope in history has.

His name will be Adonikam.
He will be from the tribe of Dan.
He will be from the ancient city of Nineveh, near Mosul in modern Iraq, an Assyrian Jewish Christian whose family tree includes the Greek Antiochus.
He will work miracles.
He will claim to be Christ.
He will rise up from obscurity near the ancient city of Antioch.


A future pope might fulfill all these things, but none have so far.


A lot of speculation. I don’t think it’s clear that there is to be some age-ending person biblically defined as The Antichrist. It’s a term in John’s letters, but whether of a truth which John believed in, or an idea his audience had merely heard about, I’m unsure. John alerted us that numerous antichrists could trouble the church. But I feel for Dan. Now Irenaeus was a very good C2 bishop with a name for peace, who introduced the idea that there would rise a supreme antichrist from the tribe of Dan (Haer. 5.30.2), and he found various OT texts that gave Dan a bad name. Let’s look at these.

An attack would be from the northern land of Dan (Jr.8:16). But that was not from the then long exiled people of Dan—so why blame the people for the land? Babylon would attack from the north—so what? Yahweh even called Babylonia his army against his people (Jl.2:1,11), so it had his blessing.

Dan had refused to help Israel fight against the Canaanites and Sisera (Jg.5:17). But so had Reuben (15-6).

Without apparent opposition, Jeroboam set up one of his golden calf-idols at Dan. But he also set up one at Bethel in Ephraim (1 Kg.12:29). So why single out Dan?

Amos used the town of Dan in the far north as a geographic point of idolatry. But he also used the town of Beersheba in the far south as a geographic point. Indeed like a sandwich the couplet could express the whole people in-between (eg Jg.20:1; 2 Sam.3:10; 17:11; 1 Kg.4:25).

Gen.49:17 seems negative, but was Dan biting an invader’s horse any worse than Gad attacking an invader’s heel (19)? And before we jump at any hiss from the Snake of v17, let us see how the exalted Snake of Nb.21 was redemptive at that time, and a prophetic pattern for the greater uplift of Jhn.3:14. The Snake motif cannot be determinative.

All the tribes had bad bits. Simply bad-mouthing Dan is unfair. As to claims of rabbinic negativity, “the tradition is not found in any [ethnic] Jewish sources and cannot therefore be confidently thought to be pre-Christian” (David Aune’s Word Biblical Commentary: Revelation 6–16, 1998:463). According to George Ladd, the argument of Irenaeus “founders on the fact that Dan was included in the salvation of the eschatological people in Ezk.48” (Revelation, 1972:115). So why was Dan’s name dropped in Revelation? Well, we simply do not know. Maybe John dropped it for some symbolism. Maybe he did not drop it, but from the word Go his text was miscopied from Dan to Man, a typo uncorrected because later scribes assumed that he meant the abbreviated form of Manasseh. Copyists do make errors.
 

[The Pope as the Antichrist]

The term antichrist (only in John’s letters) seems limited by John to a denial that Jesus is God’s son’s incarnate mode, the one who under the father is the eschatological messiah. Such denials began long before any popes raised their heads. I don’t doubt that some grotty popes have been antichrist, and I was on the pope=antichrist bandwagon, but I’d say that we have had some good Christian popes too. In John’s days such denials were surfacing through the likes of an early, perhaps proto, Gnosticism. Many act as antichrist in our day and age. Perhaps someone will arise as an antichrist above all antichrists - I know not.
 
The beast is identified as the angel of the abyss. A fallen angel as God does not imprison those who remain faithful to Him. Satan is given the keys to the abyss and releases the angel who is currently bound in the abyss in the days of the sounding of the 5th trumpet. Satan gives this beast his authority.
Where exactly is this found in scripture?

Rev 9:1-12 is about the release of locust. The star John saw that fell from heaven was an angel as angels are sometimes called stars in scripture. This angel having the key to open the bottomless pit could be the same angel we read about in Revelation 20:1-3 that God gives the key to that opens the bottomless pit where Satan is bound. When the bottomless pit was opened locust came up out of it. In reference to a smoke these locust would be to numerous to number, Judges 7:12, and look like dark smoke as they rise and swarm if you saw them from a distance. Once they became closer to your vision you would see that it wasn’t smoke, but a hoard of locust. Their attributes of what God is purposing them for is what gives them their power to sting as in tormenting those who have not the seal of God on them. They are compared as scorpions that literally sting using the power of their tails as they raise them above their head.

 
Last edited:
A lot of speculation. I don’t think it’s clear that there is to be some age-ending person biblically defined as The Antichrist. It’s a term in John’s letters, but whether of a truth which John believed in, or an idea his audience had merely heard about, I’m unsure. John alerted us that numerous antichrists could trouble the church. But I feel for Dan. Now Irenaeus was a very good C2 bishop with a name for peace, who introduced the idea that there would rise a supreme antichrist from the tribe of Dan (Haer. 5.30.2), and he found various OT texts that gave Dan a bad name. Let’s look at these.

An attack would be from the northern land of Dan (Jr.8:16). But that was not from the then long exiled people of Dan—so why blame the people for the land? Babylon would attack from the north—so what? Yahweh even called Babylonia his army against his people (Jl.2:1,11), so it had his blessing.

Dan had refused to help Israel fight against the Canaanites and Sisera (Jg.5:17). But so had Reuben (15-6).

Without apparent opposition, Jeroboam set up one of his golden calf-idols at Dan. But he also set up one at Bethel in Ephraim (1 Kg.12:29). So why single out Dan?

Amos used the town of Dan in the far north as a geographic point of idolatry. But he also used the town of Beersheba in the far south as a geographic point. Indeed like a sandwich the couplet could express the whole people in-between (eg Jg.20:1; 2 Sam.3:10; 17:11; 1 Kg.4:25).

Gen.49:17 seems negative, but was Dan biting an invader’s horse any worse than Gad attacking an invader’s heel (19)? And before we jump at any hiss from the Snake of v17, let us see how the exalted Snake of Nb.21 was redemptive at that time, and a prophetic pattern for the greater uplift of Jhn.3:14. The Snake motif cannot be determinative.

All the tribes had bad bits. Simply bad-mouthing Dan is unfair. As to claims of rabbinic negativity, “the tradition is not found in any [ethnic] Jewish sources and cannot therefore be confidently thought to be pre-Christian” (David Aune’s Word Biblical Commentary: Revelation 6–16, 1998:463). According to George Ladd, the argument of Irenaeus “founders on the fact that Dan was included in the salvation of the eschatological people in Ezk.48” (Revelation, 1972:115). So why was Dan’s name dropped in Revelation? Well, we simply do not know. Maybe John dropped it for some symbolism. Maybe he did not drop it, but from the word Go his text was miscopied from Dan to Man, a typo uncorrected because later scribes assumed that he meant the abbreviated form of Manasseh. Copyists do make errors.
I reject that. John is emphatic, "THE Antichrist is coming":

Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. (1 Jn. 2:18 NKJ)

That is a clear reference to the "abomination of desolation" Daniel says "stands up" in the fallen away church, the Temple of God:

So when you see the`abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not " (let the reader understand), "then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. (Mk. 13:14 NKJ)

The apostasy of the Church took away the daily Sacrifice of Christ, taking up His cross daily, when it accepts the "man of sin" who comes in Jesus' name, as "the Christ". He is the antichrist who sets up his image to be worshiped, 1290 days after he appears, or 30 days after he reveals he is the "seed of Satan" (Gen. 3:15) "son of Perdition" (Satan)

11 "And from the time that the daily sacrifice is taken away, and the abomination of desolation is set up, there shall be one thousand two hundred and ninety days. (Dan. 12:11 NKJ)

3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,
4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. (2 Thess. 2:3-4 NKJ)


The Antichrist has both Grecian and Jewish blood, he will be from Nineveh (Mosol) and his name "Adonikam" (the 666 Janus parallelism pointing to Ezra 2:13; Neh. 7:18), of the Tribe of Dan.

That is what Abraham meant when he prophesied the people will wait on Yahweh the Son Jesus Christ after Dan like Judas betrays all connection to Christianity, and declares himself God:


17 Dan shall be a serpent by the way, A viper by the path, That bites the horse's heels So that its rider shall fall backward.
18 I have waited for your salvation, O LORD! (Gen. 49:17-18 NKJ)


Prophecy is sealed to those whose eyes don't connect the end time events that unseal the words:

8 Although I heard, I did not understand. Then I said, "My lord, what shall be the end of these things?"
9 And he said, "Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
10 "Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand. (Dan. 12:8-10 NKJ)

 
Where exactly is this found in scripture?

Rev 9:1-12 is about the release of locust. The star John saw that fell from heaven was an angel as angels are sometimes called stars in scripture. This angel having the key to open the bottomless pit could be the same angel we read about in Revelation 20:1-3 that God gives the key to that opens the bottomless pit where Satan is bound. When the bottomless pit was opened locust came up out of it. In reference to a smoke these locust would be to numerous to number, Judges 7:12, and look like dark smoke as they rise and swarm if you saw them from a distance. Once they became closer to your vision you would see that it wasn’t smoke, but a hoard of locust. Their attributes of what God is purposing them for is what gives them their power to sting as in tormenting those who have not the seal of God on them. They are compared as scorpions that literally sting using the power of their tails as they raise them above their head.

Rev 11 Now when they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up from the Abyss will attack them, and overpower and kill them.

It's clear to me the beast that comes out of the sea is the angel of the abyss whose name means destroyer. And the beast that comes out of the earth is his false prophet, a man of lawlessness, who sets up an image of the beast and forces the whole world to bow down and worship the beast all those whose names are not written in the book of life.

And this is certainly not any Pope I have heard of. Not that you state so.
The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months. 6 It opened its mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven
And Saints are still in the world.

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.

9 Whoever has ears, let them hear.

10 “If anyone is to go into captivity,
into captivity they will go.
If anyone is to be killed[c] with the sword,
with the sword they will be killed.”[d]
This calls for patient endurance and faithfulness on the part of God’s people.
 
You also have a false prophet who acts on behalf of the beast. A man.

The beast is identified as the angel of the abyss. A fallen angel as God does not imprison those who remain faithful to Him. Satan is given the keys to the abyss and releases the angel who is currently bound in the abyss in the days of the sounding of the 5th trumpet. Satan gives this beast his authority. This beast is behind the successful attack and murder of God's two witnesses as testified in Rev 11:7 when no one else could overpower them. This adds to the powerful delusion and lie that enters the world at that time. The world will state who can make war with the beast and stand against it. Those who love evil and refuse to repent of their evil ways and refuse to believe Gods testimony will fall to the lie of the beast so as to be condemned.

But after the 42 months of reign the beasts reign will come to a sudden end as God cut short those days of great tribulation.

But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur.
You are a bit off, it is a angel of God, not the beast in any way...

Revelation 20 King James Version​

1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
 
I reject that. John is emphatic, "THE Antichrist is coming":

Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. (1 Jn. 2:18 NKJ)

That is a clear reference to the "abomination of desolation" Daniel says "stands up" in the fallen away church, the Temple of God:

So when you see the`abomination of desolation,' spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not " (let the reader understand), "then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. (Mk. 13:14 NKJ)

The apostasy of the Church took away the daily Sacrifice of Christ, taking up His cross daily, when it accepts the "man of sin" who comes in Jesus' name, as "the Christ". He is the antichrist who sets up his image to be worshiped, 1290 days after he appears, or 30 days after he reveals he is the "seed of Satan" (Gen. 3:15) "son of Perdition" (Satan)

11 "And from the time that the daily sacrifice is taken away, and the abomination of desolation is set up, there shall be one thousand two hundred and ninety days. (Dan. 12:11 NKJ)

3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,
4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. (2 Thess. 2:3-4 NKJ)


The Antichrist has both Grecian and Jewish blood, he will be from Nineveh (Mosol) and his name "Adonikam" (the 666 Janus parallelism pointing to Ezra 2:13; Neh. 7:18), of the Tribe of Dan.

That is what Abraham meant when he prophesied the people will wait on Yahweh the Son Jesus Christ after Dan like Judas betrays all connection to Christianity, and declares himself God:


17 Dan shall be a serpent by the way, A viper by the path, That bites the horse's heels So that its rider shall fall backward.
18 I have waited for your salvation, O LORD! (Gen. 49:17-18 NKJ)


Prophecy is sealed to those whose eyes don't connect the end time events that unseal the words:

8 Although I heard, I did not understand. Then I said, "My lord, what shall be the end of these things?"
9 And he said, "Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
10 "Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand. (Dan. 12:8-10 NKJ)


I’ll reply only on a few points. The range of Greek manuscripts, plus of English Bible versions, seems to undercut the idea of ‘emphatic’ for 1 Jhn.2:18: “that antichrist” (KJV); “that the antichrist” (NABRE); “that an antichrist” (ISV). Even if ‘the’ is the authentic text, translation and interpretation is moot. Eg in John’s days, some, perhaps genuine Christians, might have come up with an idea of one future antichrist, THE antichrist, to which John said to this church, Okay, you’ve heard about this idea (whether it’s true or not), but be aware that various false teachers, antichrists, are already doing the rounds, and be aware of what they are denying. Ie, perhaps John was existential, not eschatological, here.

As to the abomination, arguably it happened around AD 68, when many ethno-Jewish Christians fled Jerusalem (D A Carson’ Matthew (EBC), 2010:1102).

Picking up a name because of their listed descendants listed as 666 (Ezr.2:13) or 667 (Neh.7:18), seems far-fetched to me, like pulling rabbits out a hat and saying hey presto. If hidden code, why did Nehemiah botch it? Hey, the lists were simply for the purpose of recording the exiles who returned to Jerusalem, not for an Aha moment as we predict a future name. Moreover, arguably in the symbolism of Revelation, 666 is like saying in triplicate that humanity (the symbolic number 6) always falls short of perfection (the number 7).

You again throw in a bit about Dan without justifying such use. That idea began with Irenaeus. I gave the reasons why he came up with that idea, which is still trotted out. If I can nail you down to this particular, granting for sake of argument that there is to come and age-ending antichrist who may rightly be called THE antichrist, why do you believe that such will come from the tribe of Dan?

PS: by [That is what Abraham meant when he prophesied] I guess you meant Jacob?
 
You are a bit off, it is a angel of God, not the beast in any way...

Revelation 20 King James Version​

1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
I'm not speaking of Satan being bound for a 1000 years by God but the release of the Angel of the abyss in the days of the sounding of the 5th trump of God. The destroyer. The one noted who kills God's two witnesses in Rev 11 and is captured by God after his 42 months of reign come to end and is thrown alive into the lake of fire with his false prophet. Satan is bound at that time for a 1000 years which Rev 20 you noted states.
 
Rev 11 Now when they have finished their testimony, the beast that comes up from the Abyss will attack them, and overpower and kill them.

It's clear to me the beast that comes out of the sea is the angel of the abyss whose name means destroyer. And the beast that comes out of the earth is his false prophet, a man of lawlessness, who sets up an image of the beast and forces the whole world to bow down and worship the beast all those whose names are not written in the book of life.

And this is certainly not any Pope I have heard of. Not that you state so.
The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies and to exercise its authority for forty-two months. 6 It opened its mouth to blaspheme God, and to slander his name and his dwelling place and those who live in heaven
And Saints are still in the world.

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.

9 Whoever has ears, let them hear.

10 “If anyone is to go into captivity,
into captivity they will go.
If anyone is to be killed[c] with the sword,
with the sword they will be killed.”[d]
This calls for patient endurance and faithfulness on the part of God’s people.
What I am questioning is back in your post #11 you said "Satan is given the keys to the abyss and releases the angel who is currently bound in the abyss in the days of the sounding of the 5th trumpet."

First this doesn't happen until the sixth trumpet has sounded as the fifth trumpet is about the locust in Rev 9:1-21 and Apollyon (meaning destroyer) is the angel out of the bottomless pit, but not of Satan. The name Apollyon is only found once by name in Rev 9:11. If you notice in Rev 9:1 John is given the vision of a star that has fallen from heaven unto the earth and was given the key to the bottomless pit. Angels in scripture are often called stars in heaven, Job 38:7; Rev 1:16, 20; 2:1; 3:1; 12:1.

Apollyon/Abaddon is a Hebrew and Greek word which means destruction/destroyer as we see God used this angel for His purpose in Exodus 12:23; 1 Chronicles 21:15-18; 1 Corinthians 10:10; Hebrews 11:28; Rev 9:11.

The angel who is called Apollyon/Abaddon in Rev 9:11 was sent by God for His purpose to have this angel open the pit and rule over these locust as they were commanded not to kill any man, but to only torment them to where they would want to die, but could not. This angel according to Rev 9:11 was never previously bound/imprisoned in the pit, but was the angel of the bottomless pit. Many think that since the name means destroyer in the Hebrew that this is an evil angel that Satan uses in Rev 9 at the 5th trumpet. If this was an evil angel why would Satan use him to torment those who are already his own who refuse to repent and turn back to God?