raindog308
Member
In my travels, I've encountered several views of the role of the Holy Spirit as it applies to the current (i.e., year 2015) church.
In some denominations, the role of the Holy Spirit is almost symbolic. You're baptized, and perhaps later confirmed in some traditions, or you accept Jesus as a young adult, and the Holy Spirit perhaps symbolically indwells but it's certainly nothing dramatic. The gifts of the Spirit (such as speaking in tongues) are viewed as 1st century phenomenon, or at least very rare today. In other words, if you are "Baptized in the Spirit" there is no outward sign to others.
In other denominations (e.g., some Pentecostals), the Holy Spirit is a big deal and they believe the gifts of the Spirit (typically speaking in tongues) to be very common. "Baptism in the Spirit" is very important. These denominations believe that if you are baptized in the Spirit, everyone will certainly know about it.
I grew up in a denomination like the first. I admit being somewhat jealous of the second, as in my tradition we had confirmation (in which Pentecost from Acts was discussed) but the actual sacrament was a pretty staid affair. I mean, who wouldn't want a dramatic Spirit-filling moment?
In reading Scripture, it seems that the baptism of water is often followed by a second baptism in the Spirit (in Acts, for example) and it seems that others present know whether it's happened or not. But I'm not sure if that's supposed to apply to 2015 or is exclusively an apostolic event.
Maybe I'm wading into a controversial area but I wonder how to sort out what role the Holy Spirit should play in a Christian's life.
In some denominations, the role of the Holy Spirit is almost symbolic. You're baptized, and perhaps later confirmed in some traditions, or you accept Jesus as a young adult, and the Holy Spirit perhaps symbolically indwells but it's certainly nothing dramatic. The gifts of the Spirit (such as speaking in tongues) are viewed as 1st century phenomenon, or at least very rare today. In other words, if you are "Baptized in the Spirit" there is no outward sign to others.
In other denominations (e.g., some Pentecostals), the Holy Spirit is a big deal and they believe the gifts of the Spirit (typically speaking in tongues) to be very common. "Baptism in the Spirit" is very important. These denominations believe that if you are baptized in the Spirit, everyone will certainly know about it.
I grew up in a denomination like the first. I admit being somewhat jealous of the second, as in my tradition we had confirmation (in which Pentecost from Acts was discussed) but the actual sacrament was a pretty staid affair. I mean, who wouldn't want a dramatic Spirit-filling moment?
In reading Scripture, it seems that the baptism of water is often followed by a second baptism in the Spirit (in Acts, for example) and it seems that others present know whether it's happened or not. But I'm not sure if that's supposed to apply to 2015 or is exclusively an apostolic event.
Maybe I'm wading into a controversial area but I wonder how to sort out what role the Holy Spirit should play in a Christian's life.