Hi Vic,
Oh goodness, we read things so differently.
Yes, we sure do and I don't know about you, but because of my mindset, I guess, it takes me forever and four days to be able to look at it from somebody elses view. Like I have trouble seeing it thru others eyes to understand how they think it is this or that.
I actually 'see' the first resurrection beginning some 2,000 years ago when Jesus dies, the veil of the Temple was torn and saints arose from their 'sleep'. (graves) Matthew 27:51-52.
Matthew 27
51At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook and the rocks split. 52The tombs broke open and the bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. 53They came out of the tombs, and after Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people
WEll we are staying consistant, I disagree again. I don't consider this as a resurrection because they didn't remain 'alive', but died again. As well we see that no resurrection had occurred yet here:
2 Tim 2
who have wandered away from the truth. They say that the resurrection has already taken place, and they destroy the faith of some.
You remember that Paul turns those guys over to Satan for some straightening out.
I also believe the first resurrection concludes with those in 1 Thess 4:16.
16For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
At least here I can see it thru your eyes or your way of thinking. You feel the two resurrections are the resurrection of the wicked and the resurrection of the wicked and this in Christ group is from....yes , I see how you get that.
That is a breakthru for me...
My belief is that Revelation 20 is indentifying those of the first resurrection. I don't see that as a resurrection in itself.
Okay. I do take that as literal and call it the first resurrection. Jesus was the first resurrected, but for whatever reason this is called the first resurrection.
4......................
And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony for Jesus and because of the word of God. They had not worshiped the beast or his image and had not received his mark on their foreheads or their hands.
They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
It says in the bolded above that they did come to life. Those in verse 4 and 6 were dead because they were beheaded,. They were followers because the reason they were dead is because they were killed for their testimony.
This is the first resurrection.
This phrase is tied on to verse 5 which talks about the rest of the dead. Most I have talked to consider this to be referring to the group who are involved with that 1000 year reign with Christ. Any comments? I see the statements of verses 4 and 6 laying out the solid understanding that the 1000 year reign is trhe first resurrection.
6Blessed and holy are those who have part in the first resurrection. The second death has no power over them, but they will be priests of God and of Christ and will reign with him for a thousand years.
Look at those in Revelation 20:4 and compare them to those in Revelation 6:9. I see similarities.
Yes, I think they are the same, but I don't have that absolute connector verse to prove it.
Lets look at the end of Matthew 24 and Matthew 25. This is where I see those of the sheep and goat judgement.
Two in the field... alive.
Two woman grinding at the mill... alive.
Ten virgins... alive.
Servants with talants... alive.
I don't see it as the sheep and goats event because that is at the coming of the son of man.
Matthew 25
31"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory.
As I said here is any area that is cleared up in the determining of the time of the great tribulation. If the son of man comes immediately after the great tribulation as Mathew 24 says it does, this event is taking place in the spiritual realm or else some mortal men would have seen it.
No offense, but the burden of proof lies with you. The Bible teaches two resurrections. Jesus states so in John 5:29; And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.
Yes we touched on this a ways back.
I'll show you what I see as proof.
Daniel 12
There will be a time of distress such as has not happened from the beginning of nations until then. But at that time your peopleâ€â€everyone whose name is found written in the bookâ€â€will be delivered. 2 Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some to everlasting life, others to shame and everlasting contempt
The only time mentioned for this happening is the time of distress, but both the wicked and the righteous are involved. That means one event , esurrectees are resurrected to two places ..heaven or hell.
John 5
28"Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice 29and come outâ€â€those who have done good will rise to live, and those who have done evil will rise to be condemned.
A time is coming when both the righteous and the wicked will hear His voice and come out...........There is no mention of a separate time for the good and the righteous. The only reference to timing is in verse 25 which says:
25I tell you the truth, a time is coming and has
now come when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God and those who hear will live.
The time is now, which brings us to a third hint at the time of the great tribulation. The resurrection has been shown to be at or near the time of the great tribulation and Jesus Himself says the time NOW IS....That was 2000 years ago.
Matthew 25
31"When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
You feel these verses above are of a different event than the Great white throne. However, here again the timing for the event is at the coming of the son of man. That is when the resurrection is as well. In Matthew 25 it is quite clear to me that the good and evil are judged at the same time. You feel this is judging people who are alive, but I think they are the dead brought together in the spiritual realm.
Rev 20
11Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. ........
..... The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books.
If you follow the verses back we see that this is after the 1000 years. I argue that the 1000 years is over at the comong of the son of man time.
13The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what he had done.
Verse 13 is what tells me that both the righteous and the wicked are involved here because I don't see how only wicked could have died at sea.
So there are some 'proofs' I use to show that the resurrection of the damned and the resurrection of the righteous happen at the same time and I see that time as being near the great tribulation/parousia.
You mention 2 Cor 5:10.
Yes that is for us all as I se it . That follows along with Hebrews 9:26.
Heh, my fault for not elaborating. I see these things as well. Except for one thing... Israel first. I believe the Woman to be Israel and her remnant to be exactly what Revelation 12:17 tell us; those who accept Jesus as Messiah.
Well, taken symbolically , Israel produced the Christ, and Israel the people were some of God's favorites for a time and so on. That all becomes difficult because it's hard to keep track of everybodies definition of Israel and church and so on. I can see how you are reading this as Israel anyway.
What!? You're not going to ask me who I believe to be the Restrainer? I believe the Lawless One is one... the verse you provided gives a nice, literal answer to the question at hand. Himself, he, himself, he.
No, who the restrainer is really doesn't matter, it is who is being restrained. Here is our fourth hint of when this all takes place. If the man of lawlessness is a man, he is beingf held back as Paul writes his book. That means the whole thing has to talke place before this mortal man dies which would have been 2000 years ago.
2 Thess 2
6And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time.
They , Paul's audience, knows what IS holding the man of lawlessnes back. Therefore at that time.
noble6