has nothing to do with it it was all Godreformed
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
has nothing to do with it it was all Godreformed
its reformed thinking,but,don't tell the arminists that .has nothing to do with it it was all God
(response to words in bold):pentacostal believe that their defiance of the order to,preach to the lost ,and that God won't work around that to to save whom he will.
its not all but yes I have heard it said .if God knows our lives eons ago ,do you,really,think he just allows our wills to hinder his?
The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone. If a person feels the weight of God's wrath over him, then only the gift of faith in Christ will make Him seek the solution. Most of the world either has no faith or doesn't care about their own eternal welfare. So, when people hear John 3:16 quoted, only the elect will be interested in obeying Christ, but everyone else will reject it as foolishness, and we see this happening all the time.How do Calvinist's view John 3:16 in light of predestination?
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
"Whosoever" indicates than anyone who believes can receive eternal life.
JLB
the reformed do.I quoted my elders on this .I,mentioned the idea that we make plans and God can override our plans .we can't out think or deny God's will .
The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone.
So, when people hear John 3:16 quoted, only the elect will be interested in obeying Christ,
The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone. If a person feels the weight of God's wrath over him, then only the gift of faith in Christ will make Him seek the solution. Most of the world either has no faith or doesn't care about their own eternal welfare. So, when people hear John 3:16 quoted, only the elect will be interested in obeying Christ, but everyone else will reject it as foolishness, and we see this happening all the time.
TD
yet you balk at what the reformed teach ,strange .Make plans?
Out think or deny God’s will?
I certainly didn’t say this.
I simply stated God works through us; through our obedience.
Do you agree or not?
JLB
taking the idea of any doctrine to include predestination ,free will to the point where we the presbyters are the frozen chosen need not witness is to far and never good
yet you balk at what the reformed teach ,strange .
instead of arguing that the reformed are wrong
The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone. If a person feels the weight of God's wrath over him, then only the gift of faith in Christ will make Him seek the solution. Most of the world either has no faith or doesn't care about their own eternal welfare. So, when people hear John 3:16 quoted, only the elect will be interested in obeying Christ, but everyone else will reject it as foolishness, and we see this happening all the time.
TD
Many are invited but few are chosen."The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone."
At first glance, I thought the same thing as JLB, that this was a redundancy, and in some ways it still is. This said, however, I think I do see a legitimate difference, but there are still a lot of unspoken assumptions that must be understood to have it make sense.
This is what I hear you saying: The first clause, must be taken from the human/sinner's perspective, as if saying, "caviar is not for everyone", meaning not everyone will find caviar appealing or desirable. The second clause, comes from God's perspective and reflects his his intent. This alone differentiates the meaning everyone and anyone. Otherwise, the terms are interchangeable.
This understanding, however, is not a Reformed view, but a non-Reformed/Arminian perspective. If you mean something other than this, then I don't see how they, everyone and anyone, can be different in meaning. If this is what you are saying, it is not consistent with Calvinistic thought, in my humble opinion.
Doug
1 Cor. 2:14Can you post the chapter and verse that teaches us this?
JLB
Jesus is speaking to a Jew who believed (and rightly so) that God did not allow Gentiles into the covenant God established with Israel, so when Jesus said "the world," he in that context is talking about the Gentiles being included in the gospel kingdom. Context, context, context.Sounds like Calvinism 3:16 to me.
For God so loved theworldelect that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever is predestined for salvationbelieves in Himshould not perish but have everlasting life.
Calvinism 3:16
The very definition of “another Gospel“.
JLB
Everyone means every person who ever lived and ever will live. And since we know that the Bible clearly teaches that not everyone is saved, the gospel is not for everyone. 1 Cor. 2:14"The gospel is not for everyone (obviously), but it is for anyone."
At first glance, I thought the same thing as JLB, that this was a redundancy, and in some ways it still is. This said, however, I think I do see a legitimate difference, but there are still a lot of unspoken assumptions that must be understood to have it make sense.
This is what I hear you saying: The first clause, must be taken from the human/sinner's perspective, as if saying, "caviar is not for everyone", meaning not everyone will find caviar appealing or desirable. The second clause, comes from God's perspective and reflects his his intent. This alone differentiates the meaning everyone and anyone. Otherwise, the terms are interchangeable.
This understanding, however, is not a Reformed view, but a non-Reformed/Arminian perspective. If you mean something other than this, then I don't see how they, everyone and anyone, can be different in meaning. If this is what you are saying, it is not consistent with Calvinistic thought, in my humble opinion.
Doug
Everyone means every person who ever lived and ever will live. And since we know that the Bible clearly teaches that not everyone is saved, the gospel is not for everyone. 1 Cor. 2:14Sounds like double speak.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Whoever refers to anyone and everyone who believes.
What “believe” means is another discussion altogether.
JLB
1 Cor. 2:14
TD