Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Timing of the Rapture of the Church

Quasar

Member
Hi friends,

The following has been picked up from another thread in a discussion between Vic and me, for greater expansion.



Quote: [By Quasar]

Then Paul reveals WHEN THE RAPTURE WILL TAKE PLACE, in 2 Thes.2:3-8, just prior to when the Antichrist is revealed, who will then kick off the 7 years of tribulation prophecied by Daniel in 9:27. Paul said the Day of the Lord [The tribulation] will not come until the departure [Of the Church], and the man of lawlessness is revealed in 2 Thes.2:3 [The Antichrist], and in vs 7-8, when the restrainer is taken out of the way [The Church] the lawless one [The Antichrist] will be revealed.

Vis's reply:

>>>Sorry, Scripture says no such thing. Daniel, Jesus, Paul and John all place the revealing of antichrist midway in this 70th. Week. The Day of the Lord and the Tribulation are two separate events, not one in the same. Revelation 12 and other passages allude to that. Paul states that the revealing of antichrist can’t take place until the falling away (apostasy) of the church, then the revealing and persecutions, then God’s Wrath.

We can hash this out in another Thread. This is where I see Pre Tribulation misinterpreting and distorting prophetic timelines to support the theory.<<<


To determine exactly what the Scripture teaches us about the timing of the rapture of the church, we need to begin in Daniel 9:24-27, where God has decreed "70 Weeks upon Israel. Each of these 'weeks consist of 7 years each, which consist of a total of 490 years [70 X 7]. After the Messiah/Prince has been 'cut off,' in vs 26, which comes after completing 7 plus 62 of the 70 weeks, or 69 weeks, it totals 483 years, God's timeline stops. Because Israel is driven into a diaspora, scattered throughout the world, and no longer occupy their homeland [Until May14,1948, 1,878 years until returning].



Quote: [By Quasar]

From the first indication in the Scriptures that Israel would go through the tribulation, first mentioned in Jer.30:7, where it is referred to as Jacob's Trouble. And greatly amplified in Dan.9:24-27, where God decreed 70 Weeks of years upon the remaining destiny of Israel for this entire age. 69 Weeks of years have already been fulfilled with the 70th and final Week [7 years] still to be fulfilled, which is also known as the 7 years of tribulation.

Vic's reply:

>>>Glad you see the Gap also, which is the basis of this Thread… to show a gap in Daniel as well as other prophecies. I do not, form a Scriptural point of view, see the entire 70th. Week as Tribulation, in light of the belief some sort of covenant or treaty. I just don’t see Tribulation in the first half of the “weekâ€Â. Persecution AND peace at the same time? It’s got to be one or the other.<<<


According to the Scriptures, the 'he' who 'confirms a covenant with many for one week,' is the same 'he' who brings on the 'abomination of desolation' in the middle of the week, that Jesus refers to in Mt.24:15 - is the Antichrist, who triggers the 'week,' or the seven years of tribulation.

The Antichrist gains power through flattery and deceit and peace throughout the world in the first three and a half years. Then he reveals his true colors in the middle of the week, in what is known as the Great Tribulation [Seen also in Dan.8:23-25 and 11:3639].

The above Scriptures confirm the fact that Israel must go through the seven years of tribulation, 'Jacob's Trouble' [And has nothing to do with the church], as in Jer.30:7.

The Scriptures above have confirmed that the Antichrist enters the scene at the very beginning, and triggers the seven years of tribulation, as seen in Dan.9:27.

In 2 Thes.2:1-8, the KJV is guilty of two mistranslations. The first one is in vs 2, where they translate the text as follows: "That ye be not soon shaken, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us , as the day of 'CHRIST' is present." Virtually every ancient ms reads, "...as the Day of the Lord is present." The Day of the Lord, seen in many places in the Bible, refers to the seven years of tribulation.

The second mistranslation is in vs 3, where they translate the Greek term 'APOSTASIA' as 'FALLING AWAY.' There are different meanings for apostasia, including, falling away.' But it is determined from the contents of the text, as to which of them should be used. The original ms use the term DEPARTURE, because the context of 2 Thes. is about a rapture, and nowhere is there a single word inferring any falling away of the church.

When Jerome translated the Greek Septuagint into the Latin Vulgate in the 4th century, he used the Latin term 'discessio,' meaning departure. Later on, before the KJV was published, there were seven other English translations of the Bible who also used the term, DEPARTURE, instead of falling away, the KJV translators used in in 1611, without any explanation. Therefore 2 Thes.2:3 should read as follows from the original ms:

"Let no man deceive you by any means; for that day [The Day of the Lord] shall not come , except there come the departure [Of the Church] first, and that man of sin [The Antichrist] be revealed, the son of perdition." [Parenthetics mine].

And repeated in vs 7 and 8:

"For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hindereth/restrains [The ONE BODY, the Church of Jesus Christ, through ONE SPIRIT, as in 1 Cor.12:12-13] will continue to hinder/restrain UNTIL HE BE TAKEN OUT OF THE WAY." [Vs 7, where the 'he, is the INDWELLING HOLY SPIRIT of the ONE BODY of Christ, HIS CHURCH]. [Parenthetics mine].

"And then shall that wicked one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming" [Vs 8].

As the Scriptures reveal, the rapture of the Church takes place prior to the revealing of the Antichrist, whom the Scriptures record, triggers the 70th and final 'week' [7 years] of God's decree upon Israel.


The subject about the rapture of the Church will be covered in another thread.


Blessings,

Quasar
 
Quasar said:
Hi friends,

The Day of the Lord, seen in many places in the Bible, refers to the seven years of tribulation.

Hi Quasar
I really dont know where to start. The tribulation is not the Day of the LORD.

MATTHEW 24 [29] IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIBULATION of those days shall THE SUN BE DARKENED, and THE MOON SHALL NOT GIVE HER LIGHT, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: [30] And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. [31] And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

Right AFTER the tribulation period the sun shall be darkened and the moon wont be shining.

ISAIAH 13 [6] Howl ye; for THE DAY OF THE LORD IS AT HAND; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty. [7] Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's heart shall melt: [8] And they shall be afraid: pangs and sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at another; their faces shall be as flames. [9] BEHOLD, THE DAY OF THE LORD COMETH, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it. [10] For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: THE SUN SHALL BE DARKENED IN HIS GOING FORTH, AND THE MOON SHALL NOT CAUSE HER LIGHT TO SHINE. [11] And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible.

After the tribulation. The sun darkened and the moon shall not give light. The Day of the Lord. Its the day of Gods wrath. There are a lot more scriptures i can post to prove the trib period is not the Day of the Lord. Is it needed?
 
Quasar said:
… From the first indication in the Scriptures that Israel would go through the tribulation, first mentioned in Jer.30:7, where it is referred to as Jacob's Trouble. And greatly amplified in Dan.9:24-27, where God decreed 70 Weeks of years upon the remaining destiny of Israel for this entire age. 69 Weeks of years have already been fulfilled with the 70th and final Week [7 years] still to be fulfilled, which is also known as the 7 years of tribulation.

Vic's reply:

>>>Glad you see the Gap also, which is the basis of this Thread… to show a gap in Daniel as well as other prophecies. I do not, form a Scriptural point of view, see the entire 70th. Week as Tribulation, in light of the belief some sort of covenant or treaty. I just don’t see Tribulation in the first half of the “weekâ€Â. Persecution AND peace at the same time? It’s got to be one or the other.<<<
I agree with most of what was said, but can’t reconcile from Scripture that the week begins in Tribulation.

1 Th 5:3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

Here we have Paul alluding to a time of peace and safety, then The Day of the Lord. You even say this much in your following statement.

According to the Scriptures, the 'he' who 'confirms a covenant with many for one week,' is the same 'he' who brings on the 'abomination of desolation' in the middle of the week, that Jesus refers to in Mt.24:15 - is the Antichrist, who triggers the 'week,' or the seven years of tribulation.

The Antichrist gains power through flattery and deceit and peace throughout the world in the first three and a half years. Then he reveals his true colors in the middle of the week, in what is known as the Great Tribulation [Seen also in Dan.8:23-25 and 11:3639].
I agree so far.

The above Scriptures confirm the fact that Israel must go through the seven years of tribulation, 'Jacob's Trouble' [And has nothing to do with the church], as in Jer.30:7.

The Scriptures above have confirmed that the Antichrist enters the scene at the very beginning, and triggers the seven years of tribulation, as seen in Dan.9:27.
Sorry, I’m just not seeing any Tribulation for anyone during the 3 ½ year time of peace.

In 2 Thes.2:1-8, the KJV is guilty of two mistranslations. The first one is in vs 2, where they translate the text as follows: "That ye be not soon shaken, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us , as the day of 'CHRIST' is present." Virtually every ancient ms reads, "...as the Day of the Lord is present." The Day of the Lord, seen in many places in the Bible, refers to the seven years of tribulation.

The second mistranslation is in vs 3, where they translate the Greek term 'APOSTASIA' as 'FALLING AWAY.' There are different meanings for apostasia, including, falling away.' But it is determined from the contents of the text, as to which of them should be used. The original ms use the term DEPARTURE, because the context of 2 Thes. is about a rapture, and nowhere is there a single word inferring any falling away of the church.

When Jerome translated the Greek Septuagint into the Latin Vulgate in the 4th century, he used the Latin term 'discessio,' meaning departure. Later on, before the KJV was published, there were seven other English translations of the Bible who also used the term, DEPARTURE, instead of falling away, the KJV translators used in in 1611, without any explanation. Therefore 2 Thes.2:3 should read as follows from the original ms:

"Let no man deceive you by any means; for that day [The Day of the Lord] shall not come , except there come the departure [Of the Church] first, and that man of sin [The Antichrist] be revealed, the son of perdition." [Parenthetics mine].
So you know, I am of the Textus Receptus camp. I understand and accept some translation “errors†in the KJ, which is why I fall back on two nice Literal translations of the TR: Young’s Literal Translation and Green’s Literal translation of the TR. (YLT and LITV respectively)

Here is their interpretation:

2 Thessalonians 2
1And we ask you, brethren, in regard to the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto him,
2that ye be not quickly shaken in mind, nor be troubled, neither through spirit, neither through word, neither through letters as through us, as that the day of Christ hath arrived;
3let not any one deceive you in any manner, because -- if the falling away may not come first, and the man of sin be revealed -- the son of the destruction, (YLT)
2 Thessalonians 2
1 And, brothers, we entreat you, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together to Him,
2 for you not to be quickly shaken in the mind, nor to be disturbed, neither through a spirit, nor through speech, nor through letter, as through us, as if the Day of Christ has come.
3 Do not let anyone deceive you in any way, because that Day will not come unless first comes the falling away, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,

I can easily use the word departure and say it means departure “From the Faithâ€Â. Paul is talking to us about events prior to His gathering of His ekklesia. The emphasis here shouldn't be on The Day of the Lord, but on The Day of Christ's return for His ekklesia.

And repeated in vs 7 and 8:

"For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hindereth/restrains [The ONE BODY, the Church of Jesus Christ, through ONE SPIRIT, as in 1 Cor.12:12-13] will continue to hinder/restrain UNTIL HE BE TAKEN OUT OF THE WAY." [Vs 7, where the 'he, is the INDWELLING HOLY SPIRIT of the ONE BODY of Christ, HIS CHURCH]. [Parenthetics mine].
I believe the Restrainer to be Michael, not the Holy Spirit. A careful reading of Daniel 12 and Revelation 12 alludes to this. (there’s a Bible beauty, they are both the 12th. Chapter) Also, it has been brought to my attention that when Daniel says Michael will stand up in ch. 12, the readers of that time would take that to mean, “stand stillâ€Â. Michael had an unique relationship with Israel. He was the guardian and defender… up until the time of the Great Trib, the time in Revelation 12 when he warred with Satan and cast him down to Earth. This is when Satan begins his persecution against the Woman in Revelation 12, then goes after “the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.â€Â

That would be any of the ekklesia alive at the time.. a.k.a., us!

Take some time to research Michael and his relationship with Israel of the OT. Jewish resources are an excellent place to start.

The subject about the rapture of the Church will be covered in another thread.


Blessings,

Quasar
We will be here. I also look forward to discussing 1 Corinthians 15:52. The Pre Wrath “doctrine†is hard to swallow for some people, but if you believe in some sort of progressive revelation and believe we are in this age:

Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

There is Biblical merit to the Pre Wrath view.

Peace,
Vic
 
Matthew 24:36-37
But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. [37] But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

The "that day" spoken of in the above scripture is "The Day of the Lord". Easily proven. So if you guys that claim theres a rapture, then a 7 year trib period, well then do the math. According to you guys you will know the day and the hour. Immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun, the moon. The "Day of the Lord". So as you can now easily see, you cant put a time limit on the tribulation period or you will have to claim to know when "that day" is to come.
 
Vic
Could you give me a short timeline of your beliefs. No explaination need for them. Im not quite sure where you stand. Heres mine

A tribulation period (no timeframe)
twinkling of an eye (but not to heaven) The gathering of Gods people
Day of the Lord (Gods wrath)
1000yr period of rest

I should say that the twinkling of an eye might happen during the wrath or after, or before, not quite sure. I should look into it. But i am sure its after the trib period.
 
A seven year time period plus 30 and 45 day (Daniel 12:11-12 when you do the math)

Within the seven years are:

some sort of treaty or covenant with the Jews.

I see the first four seals as part of the fist half of the week. This to me is antichrist setting up his control over the people during this so-called time of peace.

I see the fifth seal as coinciding with Revelation 12 and Daniel 12. This is where I place the Great Tribulation.

I see where Revelation tells us:

Revelation 6:17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?

I seperate The GT and The Day of the Lord (God's Wrath) because this is how scriptue was revealed to me.

The remainding seals, trumpments and bowls are in the second half of the week and spill over into the additional time I mentioned above. (the 30 and 45 extra days in Daniel)

Seal six is where I see the beginning of the harpazio. We are well into the second half. This where I see the gathering of those in Christ happening. I can't calculate when, nobody can, even given this tight timeframe. The reason is I see this having a lot to do with Rosh Hashanah, when God blows His final Trump. The catch? Rosh Hashanah is a two day event. Who could "guess" on which day the Trump is blown?

At the end of the 70th. week, I see the sheep and goat Judgement, then Jusus returns to claim His place and rein on Earth and to gather Israel.

Then Armageddon and the binding of Satan for 1,000 years.

After the 1,000 years, Satan is destroyed, the White throne Judgement takes place, etc.

Phew! Sorry. :oops:
 
I Reckon Sow said:
Quasar said:
Hi friends,

The Day of the Lord, seen in many places in the Bible, refers to the seven years of tribulation.

Hi Quasar
I really dont know where to start. The tribulation is not the Day of the LORD.

MATTHEW 24 [29] IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIBULATION of those days shall THE SUN BE DARKENED, and THE MOON SHALL NOT GIVE HER LIGHT, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: [30] And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. [31] And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

Right AFTER the tribulation period the sun shall be darkened and the moon wont be shining.

ISAIAH 13 [6] Howl ye; for THE DAY OF THE LORD IS AT HAND; it shall come as a destruction from the Almighty. [7] Therefore shall all hands be faint, and every man's heart shall melt: [8] And they shall be afraid: pangs and sorrows shall take hold of them; they shall be in pain as a woman that travaileth: they shall be amazed one at another; their faces shall be as flames. [9] BEHOLD, THE DAY OF THE LORD COMETH, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate: and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it. [10] For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: THE SUN SHALL BE DARKENED IN HIS GOING FORTH, AND THE MOON SHALL NOT CAUSE HER LIGHT TO SHINE. [11] And I will punish the world for their evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; and I will cause the arrogancy of the proud to cease, and will lay low the haughtiness of the terrible.

After the tribulation. The sun darkened and the moon shall not give light. The Day of the Lord. Its the day of Gods wrath. There are a lot more scriptures i can post to prove the trib period is not the Day of the Lord. Is it needed?



Let's review the Scriptures involved to determine if what you have posted squares with it or not. The first point is found in the 70th and final week [Of 7 years] in Dan.9:27 which reads as follows:

"And he will make a firm covenant with the many for ONE WEEK, but in the middle of the week he [The same he as the first one] will put a stop to the sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abomination will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate." NASB

The Scriptures reveal, the 'he' in that verse is the Antichrist, who is revealed, bringing in world peace which will last for only three and a half years, before he brings in world conflict and destruction.


Paul confirms the above scenario, but adds the Church into it, which is not in view in the OT, in 2 Thes.2:1-4, as follows:

"Now we request you brethren, with regard to the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering unto Him [As Paul had taught them in 1 Thes.4:14-18], that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the DAY OF THE LORD has come. Let no one in any way deceive3 you, for it will not come unless the DEPARTURE [Taken from the original mss, OF THE CHURCH] comes first, and the man of lawlessness [The 'he' of Dan.9:27, the Antichrist] IS REVEALED, the son of destruction." {Parenthetics mine].

The same scene is repeated in vss 7 and 8, and is what Jesus referred to in Mt.24:15. Those two passages of Scripture clearly document that the Antichrist will be revealed, after the Church has departed, and then the DAY OF THE LORD, the 70th and final week [7 years] of tribulation begins, consisting of all of that week, not just part of it.

Jesus ministry was to the lost sheep of Israel only, while He was on earth, as He said in Mt.10:5-6 and 15:24, and in all of Mt.24:29-30, where He refers to His elect, meaning Israel, in that passage. [The Church is also His elect, but we do not go through the tribulation. The two elects, as in the two sheep folds of Jn.10:16, will become one, after Israel recognizes their Messiah, at the end of the tribulation, in Zech.12:10 and 14:4-5.

Jesus return to the earth in His second coming, as revealed in Mt.24, Mk.13 and Lk.21 has nothing whatever to do with His appearing in the clouds of the sky to catch up all of us who are still alive and belong to Him. As written in Jn.14:1-4 and 28 along with 1 Thes.4:14:18.

Does it not seem strange to you that when those of us whose bodies die, our spirit/souls go to be with the Lord instantly as is written in 2 Cor.5:6-8 and Phil.1:21-23, confirming Ecc.12:7; when you believe He is going to let all those who are left here alive when the tribulation begins go through the wrath, Paul wrote He saves us from, in 1 Thes.1:10? I hardly think so.

As for the Day of the Lord as Paul used it in 2 Thes.2:2, he clearly meant as the beginning of the tribulation, the Thessalonican church feared they were in, by a forged letter as from Paul telling them Jesus had already come, and they were still left on the earth. Which Paul taught them in 1 Thes.4:4-18 they would not be. It is used in a different time frame in other passages of Scripture, meaning the wrath of God.

Blessings,

Quasar
 
After the tribulation. The sun darkened and the moon shall not give light. The Day of the Lord. Its the day of Gods wrath. There are a lot more scriptures i can post to prove the trib period is not the Day of the Lord. Is it needed?
Agree with you Sow. Add these to your list of Scriptures:

Joel 2:1 Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble: for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand;
Joel 2:2 A day of darkness and of gloominess, a day of clouds and of thick darkness, as the morning spread upon the mountains: a great people and a strong; there hath not been ever the like, neither shall be any more after it, even to the years of many generations.

Joel 2:31 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and the terrible day of the LORD come.

Joel 3:14 Multitudes, multitudes in the valley of decision: for the day of the LORD is near in the valley of decision.
Joel 3:15 The sun and the moon shall be darkened, and the stars shall withdraw their shining.

Amos 5:18 Woe unto you that desire the day of the LORD! to what end is it for you? the day of the LORD is darkness, and not light.
Amos 5:19 As if a man did flee from a lion, and a bear met him; or went into the house, and leaned his hand on the wall, and a serpent bit him.
Amos 5:20 Shall not the day of the LORD be darkness, and not light? even very dark, and no brightness in it?

Zephaniah 1:14 The great day of the LORD is near, it is near, and hasteth greatly, even the voice of the day of the LORD: the mighty man shall cry there bitterly.
Zephaniah 1:15 That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness,

Yes, the OT prophets have a LOT to say concerning the timing of The Day of the Lord. All of it Gods' Wrath; none of it pertains to Antichrist persecution against Israel OR Her remnant.
 
The timing of the rapture of the church

Hi guys,

Please accept my apology for clicking on the wrong button. I had no intentions of literally 'ignoring' you Vic. Your site is somewhat different than others I frequent and due to my being new on yours, it will take time for me to learn how to get all the right bells to ring and the lights to light up

Blessings,

Quasar
 
The timing of the rapture of the church

Quote by Vic:

>>>Quote: [By Quasar]

The above Scriptures confirm the fact that Israel must go through the seven years of tribulation, 'Jacob's Trouble' [And has nothing to do with the church], as in Jer.30:7.

The Scriptures above have confirmed that the Antichrist enters the scene at the very beginning, and triggers the seven years of tribulation, as seen in Dan.9:27.

Sorry, I’m just not seeing any Tribulation for anyone during the 3 ½ year time of peace.<<<


Forget about calling it the tribulation and call it the 70th and final WEEK of God's decree upon the disposition of Israel, if you like. Or call it Jacob's Trouble if you prefer, but any way you look at it, the Scriptures clearly reveal it is a seven year time frame.


Quote by Vic:

>>>So you know, I am of the Textus Receptus camp. I understand and accept some translation “errors†in the KJ, which is why I fall back on two nice Literal translations of the TR: Young’s Literal Translation and Green’s Literal translation of the TR. (YLT and LITV respectively)

Here is their interpretation:

2 Thessalonians 2
1And we ask you, brethren, in regard to the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together unto him,
2that ye be not quickly shaken in mind, nor be troubled, neither through spirit, neither through word, neither through letters as through us, as that the day of Christ hath arrived;
3let not any one deceive you in any manner, because -- if the falling away may not come first, and the man of sin be revealed -- the son of the destruction, (YLT)
2 Thessalonians 2
1 And, brothers, we entreat you, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together to Him,
2 for you not to be quickly shaken in the mind, nor to be disturbed, neither through a spirit, nor through speech, nor through letter, as through us, as if the Day of Christ has come.
3 Do not let anyone deceive you in any way, because that Day will not come unless first comes the falling away, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,

I can easily use the word departure and say it means departure “From the Faithâ€Â. Paul is talking to us about events prior to His gathering of His ekklesia. The emphasis here shouldn't be on The Day of the Lord, but on The Day of Christ's return for His ekklesia.<<<


As I have written previously, the term APOSTASIA has several interpretations, of which which one is used, depends entirely upon the text. In the case of 2 Thes., you will not find a single word that has any reference to a 'falling away,' or a 'departure of the faith' of the church


The following is a brief window as to what the Textus Receptus is and when it was written:

"Textus Receptus (Latin: "received text") is the name given to the first Greek-language text of the New Testament to be printed on a printing press. It was compiled by Dutch-Catholic scholar and humanist Desiderius Erasmus in 1516 for his translation of the Bible into Latin, and later used as the basis for the translation of the New Testament by William Tyndale, for the original Luther Bible, and for most other Reformation-era translations throughout Western and Central Europe. The Textus Receptus is classified by scholars as a late Byzantine text."


The following is the historical background of the term APOSTASIA, from the time of the 4th century translation of the Greek Septuagint into the Latin Vulgate, by Jerome.


This is another area within the Scripures that needs serious thought and prayer as to how it should be interpreted from the original.

A translation of the Greek word - 'Apostasia' -

In 2 Thes.2:3 is also - 'departure.'

Most of the English Bible translations use either the word 'apostasy', or 'the rebellion.'

Yet, neither of the latter really fit the text. For example:

"Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come, until the 'departure' occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction."

See how much better that rendering fits the following scripture following, in verse 7.

"For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so until he is taken out of the way."

That's a departure - not an apostasy or a rebellion!

Verse 3 clearly ties in with verse 7 as to the contextual meaning of that entire passage of scripture, when the proper English word for the original Greek is substituted for what most Bibles presently translated it as.

The text of the apostle Paul in 2 Thes.2:3-8 is not about 'falling away,' or an 'apostasy' of the Church, but rather a DEPARTURE. To DEPART and to be with the Lord forever. 1 Thes.4:14-18. To be 'taken out of the way' [vs 7] of the antichrist, the tribulation and the wrath of God.

Consider the following:

The translators of the King James Version were the first to introduce the new rendering of 'apostasia,' as 'falling away' [apostasy]. [2 Thes.2:3]. Unfortunately, most English translators have followed the KJV and Beza Bible in departing from translating 'apostasia' as 'departure.' No good reason was ever given.

"Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the 'apostasy' comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition." 2 Thes.2:3.

The very text of Paul's message in 2 Thes.2:3 is speaking about the rapture. Because the Greek noun 'apostasia,' usually translated 'apostasy,' is a reference to the rapture and should be translated 'departure.'

The word is a Greek compound of 'apo,' or 'from' and 'istemi,' or 'stand.' Thus it has the core meaning of 'away from' or 'departure,' 'disappearance.'

Gordon Lewis explains how the verb from which the noun 'apostasia' is derived supports the basic meaning of 'departure' in the following:

"The verb may mean to remove spatially. There is little reason then to deny that the noun can mean such a spatial removal or departure. Since the noun is used only one other time in the New Testament, of the apostasy from Moses [Acts 21:21], we can hardly conclude that its Biblical meaning is necessarily determined. The verb is used fifteen times in the New Testament. Of these fifteen, only three have to do with a departure from the faith [Lk.8:13; 1 Tim.4:1; Heb.3:12]. The word is used for departing from iniquity [2 Tim.2:19], from ungodly men [1 Tim.6:5], from the temple [Lk.2:27], from the body [2 Cor.12:8], and from persons [Acts 12:10; Lk.4:13]."

"It is with full assurance of proper exegetical study and with complete confidence in the original languages, that the word meaning of 'apostasia' is defined as 'departure.'" Concludes Daniel Davey.

Paul Lee Tan adds the following:

"What precisely does Paul mean when he says that the 'falling away' must come before the tribulation? The definite article 'the' denotes that this will be a definite event, an event distinct from the appearance of the man of sin. The Greek word for 'falling away,' taken by itself, does not mean religious apostasy or defection. Neither does the word mean 'to fall,' as the Greeks have another word for that ['pipto,' I fall; TDI]. The best translation of the word is 'to depart.' The Apostle Paul refers here to a definite event which he calls 'the departure,' and which will occur just before the start of the tribulation. This is the Rapture of the Church."

So the word has core meaning of 'departure' and it depends upon the context to determine whether it is used to mean physical departure or an abstract departure such as a departure from the faith.

The first seven English Bible translations of 'apostasia' all rendered the noun as either 'departure' or 'departing.' They are as follows: Wycliff in AD 1384; Tyndale in AD 1526; Coverdale in AD 1535; Cranmer in AD 1539; Breeches in AD 1576; Beza in AD 1583; and the Geneva in AD 1608.

This supports the notion that the word truly means 'departure.' In fact, Jerome's Latin translation known as the Vulgate in the 4th century renders 'apostasia' with the word 'discessio,' meaning 'departure.' So why did the King James Version depart from the established translation of 'departure?' KJV in AD 1611.

Therefore Beza, the Swiss reformer was the first to transliterate 'apostasia' and create a new word rather than translate it as others had done. The translators of the King James Version were the first to introduce the new rendering of 'apostasia' as 'falling away.' Most English translators have followed the KJV and Beza in departing from translating 'apostasia' as 'departure.' No good reason was ever given.

Therefore, if 2 Thes.2:3 were properly translated per the original text, it should read as follows:

"Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the 'departure' comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition." [vs 3].

With that having been stated, the following passages of Scripture are in perfect harmony with the original text in vs 3, using the proper term, 'departure,' instead of 'falling away' or 'apostasy:'

"For the mystery of iniquity does already work; only he who now restrains will continue to restrain until he is taken out of the way." [vs 7].

"And then shall that wicked one be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brilliance of His coming." [vs 8].

From the above, we have a much clearer view of the above text referring to the Rapture of the Church, when the antichrist will be revealed and when the tribulation will begin.


Quote by Vic:

>>>I believe the Restrainer to be Michael, not the Holy Spirit. A careful reading of Daniel 12 and Revelation 12 alludes to this. (there’s a Bible beauty, they are both the 12th. Chapter) Also, it has been brought to my attention that when Daniel says Michael will stand up in ch. 12, the readers of that time would take that to mean, “stand stillâ€Â. Michael had an unique relationship with Israel. He was the guardian and defender… up until the time of the Great Trib, the time in Revelation 12 when he warred with Satan and cast him down to Earth. This is when Satan begins his persecution against the Woman in Revelation 12, then goes after “the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.â€Â

That would be any of the ekklesia alive at the time.. a.k.a., us!

Take some time to research Michael and his relationship with Israel of the OT. Jewish resources are an excellent place to start.<<<


References made to Michael, the archangel, has to do with his responsibility as the prince of his people, Israel, in Dan.12. The church is not involved in any of the prophecies in Daniel, nor is Michael. Michael is seen again in 1 Thes.4:16, when his voice is heard, with the loud command of Jesus and the trumpet call of God. what kind of a restrainer do you think Michael would be, when 'he is taken out of the way,' in 2 Thes.2:7? That would render him a pretty powerless restrainer in my opinion.

Reference to Michael in Rev.12, is the prophecy that he will throw Satan and his angels out of heaven, vss 7-9, which proves my point, that Michael could not be the restrainer, who will be taken out of the way. That is the Church, consisting of all of us with the indwelling Holy Spirit, who had been the HUMAN restrainer against the wicked and the godless.

In connection with Rev.12:17, written as follows: "Then the dragon was enraged at the woman and went of to war against the rest of HER OFFSPRING - those who obey God's commandments and hold to the testimony of Jesus..." This opens an entirely different subject, involving those who will be saved during the tribulation, beginning with the 144,000 and the parenthetic view of the great multitude in Rev.7. None of whom belong to the Church, or they would have been raptured before the Antichrist was revealed.


Blessings,

Quasar
 
Re: The timing of the rapture of the church

Quasar said:
Hi guys,

Please accept my apology for clicking on the wrong button. I had no intentions of literally 'ignoring' you Vic. Your site is somewhat different than others I frequent and due to my being new on yours, it will take time for me to learn how to get all the right bells to ring and the lights to light up

Blessings,

Quasar
No need to apologize. Plus, I'm used to being ignored. LOL (though know it wasn't your intentions at all. I got your PMs. :) )

As long as you don't hit the "self-destruct" button. :lol:
 
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.
 
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.


Is that not what discussion boards are for? To find the common denomintors of the Scriptures as best as we can?

2 Tim.3:16-17.

Blessings,

Quasar
 
Quasar said:
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.


Is that not what discussion boards are for? To find the common denomintors of the Scriptures as best as we can?

2 Tim.3:16-17.

Blessings,

Quasar
I agree. Besides it's fun and enlightening. It has "exposed" me to Scripture I may have not studied in a serious way.
 
Quasar said:
Is that not what discussion boards are for? To find the common denomintors of the Scriptures as best as we can?
Quasar

Ideally, yes.

But there is much band-width being sucked up by people who promote an agenda.
 
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.

Can you give an example of what you find in the pre-wrath view that doesn't hold water???
 
Judy said:
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.

Can you give an example of what you find in the pre-wrath view that doesn't hold water???


Hi Judy,

Good to find another pre-trib believer like me, as it is the only time frame the Scriptures clearly reveal to us.

Blessings,

Quasar
 
Quasar said:
Judy said:
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.

Can you give an example of what you find in the pre-wrath view that doesn't hold water???


Hi Judy,

Good to find another pre-trib believer like me, as it is the only time frame the Scriptures clearly reveal to us.

Blessings,

Quasar

I am sorry if I gave you that impression, because I am pre-wrath not pre-trib.
And scripture does not clearly teach pre-trib.
 
Judy said:
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.

Can you give an example of what you find in the pre-wrath view that doesn't hold water???

I don't agree with their arguement that all God's warth is confined to the last half-week of Daniel.
 
MrKris said:
Judy said:
MrKris said:
The timing of the Rapture should not be a source of contention among Christians.

Personally, I have some problems with a pre-trib Rapture, but it certainly holds more water than the the "pre-wrath" view.

Can you give an example of what you find in the pre-wrath view that doesn't hold water???

I don't agree with their arguement that all God's warth is confined to the last half-week of Daniel.

Do you have any scripture to back up your disagreement?
 
Back
Top