[_ Old Earth _] trojan horse of creationism

[JohnR7]

“Those who cavalierly reject the Theory of Evolution, as not adequately supported by facts, seem quite to forget that their own theory is supported by no facts at all.â€Â
â€â€Herbert Spencer, 1820-1903

There is no conflict between creationism and the facts. By fact I assume you mean what science currently believes. There is no conflict between true science and the Bible.

 

[Asimov]

“Those who cavalierly reject the Theory of Evolution, as not adequately supported by facts, seem quite to forget that their own theory is supported by no facts at all.â€Â
â€â€Herbert Spencer, 1820-1903

There is no conflict between creationism and the facts. By fact I assume you mean what science currently believes. There is no conflict between true science and the Bible.

So...what is true science, John?

 

[element80]

There's evidence that supports creation.

 

[keebs]

Like what?

 

[element80]

Like what?

try "scientific creationism" for starters

 

[keebs]

I was asking you, not google. You said there's proof, you have to supply it. Otherwise, hush up and don't bother posting. Oh, and I feel it's my duty to let you know that "scientific creationism" is a load of crud. Heck, they can't even come up with a name that isn't an oxymoron.

 

[Asimov]

There's evidence that supports creation.

There's also evidence that bigfoot exists, and we never landed on the moon. That doesn't mean it's correct evidence.