- Dec 29, 2017
- 18,527
- 7,286
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Lee Greenwood has a very good song about this...
But yeah...Taps is important.
My family has dodged that bullet though. Haven't lost anyone close to me in Service. Many have served...but no one even caught a bullet. One did get poisoned...but he was military intelligence.
The Uncle who got poisoned recovered...and he quit flirting with the local girls as a result.I'm really sorry to hear that. I was going to save that song for Independence Day but I will do it for you and America after I finish unloading the dishwasher and before I get in the shower.
The Uncle who got poisoned recovered...and he quit flirting with the local girls as a result.
Instead he waited until he got back to the USA to make eyes at a nice woman. Their kids are grown and got kids of their own.
1. Were all the veterans that fought in wars drafted or did some willingly enlist?
Many volunteered. There has not been a draft since June 1973. All of today's soldiers are volunteers.
2. As much as I love Sam Elliot why didn't the surviving soldiers just tell their own stories?
Many volunteered. There has not been a draft since June 1973. All of today's soldiers are volunteers.
It would only be crooked if people did not volunteer then a free nation fighting so you could be free would not make sense.
If a government forces it's people to do something then it's not a free country. It can say you cannot do something, but it cannot tell people they must do something.
In a true free country the government does not have anything compulsory on it's citizens as that is forcing people to do something against there will.
True but even in a free country there has to be rules set in place in order for the government to run smoothly.
Why should government have any right over the will of another person in any situation. That is why they push to extremes there views to get people to willingly accept something without force against there will.
For example the governemnt cannot force people to take vaccines as that is a huge violation, yet they can push to the extremes everywhere how great and how much people really really should have it.
Sorry, I don't think I really understand what you're saying but if the government didn't make laws then people would do whatever they wanted to and having too much freedom isn't good at all.
And giving a handful of humans the power and control over everyone elses lives is not good either.
There is nothing wrong with rules as long as they don't contradict. Your not allowed to touch another person against there will as that is by law assault, so the government cannot force people to take a vaccine jab and have a piece of metal stabbed in there arm and insert fluid, or random compulsory body searches by authorities where they pat you down.
You are not allowed to harm another person in any way as according to the law that is assault or murder, so the governemnt cannot force people to go to war.
The law is not above the law, if it was then there would be no point of even having a law. What's the point in having a law if it has double standards and only a select few are allowed to violate it.
I am a law abiding citizen, clean record, and I have no problem with authorities like the police, I think they do a great job, I just don't like double standards and hypocracy in general.
I sort of see what you're saying now but it still doesn't make a hundred percent sense to me. :/
All im saying is if a governemnt forces you to do something against your choice then it's not a free country. There is a difference between telling someone they cannot do something and telling someone they must do something even if both are rules. And like I said the law should never contradict itself or have double standards.
If murder is illegal by law for example then the death penalty is a double standard. You cannot murder but the government authorities can.
Actually wrong. Killing somebody without reason is murder but killing out of defense or self-defense is a whole different story.
So if someone is restrained by authorities, and is standing before a judge, what reason in self defence does a judge have in that situation where that person should get a death sentence?.
The person is fully restrained and fully guarded, and cannot do anything, is not a threat, and in the name of self defense gets sentenced to death?.
Maybe because of the fact that they're protecting other people that might possibly wind up getting killed by them?