tim-from-pa
Member
- Aug 4, 2005
- 4,716
- 435
Say Vic, this thread is filling up fast again. We won't even miss those posts that accidentally got dumped. :-D
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
samuel said:Ok, if you know anything about me, it is that I am hardheaded. I did some research, and came up with an article, where the man has done his homework. It explains all the days sounding the crucifixion, and pretty well leaves no argument for a Thursday crucifixion. And a few other interesting ideas thrown in also. Read it carefully, so you understand all that it says. Its long so you might! want to bring your lunch.
His body [His flesh] was laid in the tomb just before sunset, when the "High Sabbath" of the Feast of Unleavened Bread began. His body laid in the tomb for the first three days of this feast, from the 15th through the 17th of Nisan.
I see! Maybe "we" need some lessons in math. 8-)tim_from_pa said:Say Vic, this thread is filling up fast again. We won't even miss those posts that accidentally got dumped. :-D
Now, I lost all my research and links to all this when the original posts disappeared. Bummer... I'm not about to look it all up again, but for the sake of discovering the truth, it's worth it for the skeptic to do some research. Simply though, a day can be a portion of a day; a night can be a portion of a night, but when combined, day and night, it becomes more descriptive, more literal. Three days and three nights is a prophecy, if it isn't true, then it's a false prophecy.In the Bible, parts of time units were frequently counted as wholes. Thus a king might be said to have reigned for two years, even if he reigned for only fourteen months. In the same way, a day and a night does not mean a period of twenty-four hours. It can refer to any portion of a day coupled with any portion of a night. The expression "three days and three nights" could be used as simply a slightly hyperbolic way of referring to "three days."
We can all agree that Palm Sunday is the correct day for His entry into Jerusalem.
vic C. said:.....a day can be a portion of a day; a night can be a portion of a night, but when combined, day and night, it becomes more descriptive, more literal.In the Bible, parts of time units were frequently counted as wholes. Thus a king might be said to have reigned for two years, even if he reigned for only fourteen months. In the same way, a day and a night does not mean a period of twenty-four hours. It can refer to any portion of a day coupled with any portion of a night. The expression "three days and three nights" could be used as simply a slightly hyperbolic way of referring to "three days."
vic C. said:Three days and three nights is a prophecy, if it isn't true, then it's a false prophecy.
I wouldn't want to be the one suggesting Jesus is a false prophet. :-?
Tim, help me do some research here. The Hebrews were commanded to take their lamb home for four days. According to above, we have them doing this on a Sabbath. Can they do this without breaking Sabbath laws? Or were they allowed to get their lamb a day earlier? :smt017Actually Vic, I don't agree with that one either. I believe he entered the 10th day of the month. Actually, what took place as "palm Sunday" was probably late Friday afternoon the 9th as Mark was saying it was getting dark after he looked around the temple area. This would assure us that the Lamb of God was there in time for the entire 10th day of the month (a weekly Sabbath) by sundown.
vic C. said:Tim, help me do some research here. The Hebrews were commanded to take their lamb home for four days. According to above, we have them doing this on a Sabbath. Can they do this without breaking Sabbath laws? Or were they allowed to get their lamb a day earlier? :smt017Actually Vic, I don't agree with that one either. I believe he entered the 10th day of the month. Actually, what took place as "palm Sunday" was probably late Friday afternoon the 9th as Mark was saying it was getting dark after he looked around the temple area. This would assure us that the Lamb of God was there in time for the entire 10th day of the month (a weekly Sabbath) by sundown.
I'm reading this right now.
http://philologos.org/bpr/files/jewish_feasts/js010.htm
vic C. said:I don't know why you keep bringing up Friday, Tim. I never mentioned Friday. Friday is out of the question.
All I'm trying to figure out is, if Nissan 10 fell on a Sabbath, when were the Jews allowed to get their Passover lamb? Is there a provision to procure it a day earlier? Nissan 10 usually falls on our Mon., Wed., or Sat. if I remember correctly, so a Sat. Nissan 10 was quite common.
vic C. said:
Yes, the "original" Nissan 10th. did fall on a weekly Sabbath. Just as you were posting this, I got the answer I was looking for.tim_from_pa said:...The answer is yes. As a matter of fact, this is a Sabbath in itself (like the other feast days)
http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Holida ... gadol.htmlOrigins of Shabbat HaGadol
According to the Talmud, the Exodus from Egypt occurred on Thursday, Nisan 15th, thus making the 10th of that month a Shabbat. It was on this great Shabbat that the LORD commanded the families of Israel to obtain a lamb for sacrifice and to bring it to their homes. This was to be Korban Pesach - the Passover lamb - to be sacrificed on Nisan 14th.